HAD ENOUGH! Puma Punku 80,000 years old! MANY later modifications!

Glaring Anomalies no-one mentions:
* There was a 40m x 7m x ?m deep block, obviously geopolymer, as not cut from rocks at the site. Can't lift the thing!
* Conquistadors/Archaeologists made a 'repair' by using clamps or something to 'hold the blocks together?' which is so useless the original builders would not have bothered. Everyone erroneously thinks this is original?
* The enormous block could never have been dragged there, and was broken apart in a tremendous Earth Upheaval as has been separated, yet is too heavy for anyone to have done it. There must have been a terrified catastrophe or bombardment which history does not record, hence the site is at least 80,000 years of age, perhaps pre-Toba supervolcano when Earth was One language.
* The door of Tiwanaku nearby looks like the rest of Puma Punku with the exception that the carving is pretty sloppy and was done by a later people, (much later).
* The Tiwanaku sun gate also contains side slots which are found on the Infamous Seventh Door at Padaswamy Temple in India which I have also suggested is a kind of research facility or temple.
* There are tiny steps leading out of a foot bath, which may have been used for decontamination purposes, so were these people actually four foot tall?
* Skyscrapers are depicted on the reliefs which look like the Petronas Tower.
* Puma Punku looks nothing like half the stuff at Tiwanaku, ergo Tiwanaku was built from the RUINS of Puma Punku and goodness knows what else!
* Puma Punku also looks NOTHING like ANYTHING else in Peru. Peru seems to have been a mountain world fortress in ancient times. Even all the other stuff in Peru which is high technology was from tens of thousands of years after Puma Punku was built!
* Who built the metal clamps and where are they? Could this have been used as a church by conquistadors who were worried about further earthquakes affecting the structure? What is going on here?! This makes absolutely no sense!
* Could go on and on endlessly! It was a research facility, built from geopolymer!
* This is sure as heck not "536AD and later" as is claimed. If it was it would match everything else in Peru. It does not! That's total fakery! The world was in a HUGE catastrophe in that time!? No-one built NOTHING!
* Taking everything into consideration, dating this to the Vimana period of 80,000 BC at least.

Links:

"Music by Garnett Leary

[TechnologyHive]

Where did you get 80, 000 years from? What scientific method are you using to come up with this age?

[MojoPreacher]

Theese joints are seen all over on megaliths. I believe they were originally filled with bronze. Not for keeping the stones together, maybe for creating an electrical conductor between the stones ??

[Budsport_TV]

What the reasoning for the 80, 000 year old date?

[michaeldublg]

at 6:15 he points out a decontamination pool.... I mean, what possible evidence presented in that picture indicates a "decontamination pool"?

[gitmoholliday]

Did they ever found stones with the metal joints still in it ?

[thepeacemaker]

Love your videos, and still..i wonder how the heck these polygonal walls get made!! I have an idea. Someone mentioned these stones look like they have an almost 'textured' surface, like they were sacks of some alchemy stacked. I was thinking that with all the flooding here recently, maybe these people just stacked bags of concrete or sand to keep flood waters out, and over time and being under water perhaps, the sacks erroded and left behind these fitted some shapes?? Many not high tech but just sandbags? What's your thought on this? Thanks for your time charles.

[UnkyjoesPlayhouse]

Your content gets better and better, nice intro, keep up the passion, I love the way you think out of the box, and your ability to see through the puzzle of time, even if your wrong it awakens my mind, so thanks :)

[michaeldublg]

at 55 seconds this guy says "it's obvious this was some sort of research facility".
OK, what?!
obvious? .... this is the fifth video I've watched of this guy and it's clear he does not have the Instinct for what I'm referring to as "armchair video archaeology" ...

[hjagernauth]

Maybe millions of years ago. Who knows?

[ARD-lkpr]

Sorry if I missed it but where did the figure of 80, 000 years come from?

[larrychaffin]

Yes, a little peeved sounding; however, you're observations are very keen. I'm glad I found your channel.

[anglictechnique]

I concur regarding the metal joiners ... it makes sense that this large slab has split and was repaired with the metal keys .... clearly this is a functional piece molded stone, perhaps a foundation for a structure .... perhaps in the time frame when these key type repairs were made, there was a lot of earth quake and seismic activity and, as you stated, in later times after construction, repairs were made ... Have you found any examples of these metal keys on the inside of stone structures, or are they only found on the visible surface? If this was a repair you would expect the cracks and holes to also be filled in and repaired, which does not seem evident in this picture ... Has this site been excavated at some time?

[nancyd]

Dr. Cos, every day I look for your videos, I learn so much from you, thank you. Please pardon my naivety but, two of the slabs look as though they might have been verticle and adjacent to the far left slab; what am I not seeing that would tell me other wise? Thank you!

[garyaubin]

Hi Charles. Where are you located in Oz? Do you travel to Egypt much?

[charlesnunno]

Charles, what is the other site where those "vents" are found?

[keenaussie]

Please tell me why 80, 000 years old. Is there evidence you can share with us. Thanks.

[jonathanryals]

Hey Charles. Love your channel!

Here is an idea: the stone was joined with metal so electric current could flow over the entire structure freely.

[stephentoons]

How are you dating these to 80, 000 years. Agreed, though, the slab at the beginning looks poured, and at some point developed cracks. then the poured metal joints were added to hold it together.

[StanJan]

It was a wall. Not a slab. Very nice to see Chaz is back ! Love your mind. Getting closer ! The original builders did not ornament their work ! Your right.

[amfinc]

Something new I just thought about Charles: So, you mentioned the small scale of the steps in the "pool" rock and how they would be impractical. After watching a few Phenomenal Travel Videos with Praveen Mohan, I've learned that in India some of the ancient temples have small, scaled-down diagrams of the temple... IN the temple! Perhaps the small scale things we see could be part of a diagram of the larger site...

Also the lintel in the center of the screen at 5:39, I just know I've seen that motif before, and it wasn't South America... I cannot place where I saw it, but you'll be the first to know when I do.