Scientists Finally Find a New Way to Travel Much Faster Than Light!

What if I told you that WARP propulsion, once just a fantasy, is now on the verge of becoming a reality? Can you imagine spaceships flying faster than the speed of light? Scientists have discovered a way to make it happen, traveling ten times faster than light itself. It's incredible! Just think of the doors this will open for exploring the universe and uncovering its mysteries. This breakthrough isn't just about speed; it's about reshaping our understanding of space and what's possible in it. Get ready for a future where the stars are within our reach like never before!

[davidharvey]

I love how many of us watched this video knowing that it was B.S. Unfortunately, too many could be deceived.

[adriansdev]

Imagine if science found a way to clickbait 10 times faster than normal clickbait. You'd be able to clickbait around the videoverse faster than people can watch videos, potentially being able to publish the first real life implementation of self sustaining nuclear fusion plants (No harm intended, but I could not help myself to poke fun at this)

[benahaus]

10 seconds in and had to stop the flow of garbage.

[AD-kvkj]

It is not on the verge of becoming reality. It's 100% theoretical maths, and even the most super generous estimates for the amount of energy you would need to generate, harness, store and use (safely too...) would be the equivalent energy to an entire dwarf star... It is nonsense when it comes to practical reality. Even if you could generate the equivalent energy of a STAR (just think for a second about that, this is real life, not cartoon sci fi...), then harness it through something to warp space-time itself in a highly controlled and relatively safe fashion, then even one tiny mistake, ever, and you would destroy not only our entire solar system, but neighbouring solar systems also with the destructive force unleashed.

[Darkwolfe.]

I made the same assertion a decade ago: the only feasible method for space travel is to manipulate time and space. This would provide the necessary velocity to journey from one planet to another. However, it's not something that will be unraveled in the near future. There are more complexities to bending time and space than one might realize, and they extend beyond mathematical equations. How many dimensions will you traverse? What will you do upon arrival? Where is your destination? How will it affect the cells in your body? How will it alter your reality? These are questions that require careful consideration and planning.. You think I'm crazy, but you'll find out that I'm not. How will you harness electromagnetism in space? Electromagnetism is considered a means to travel faster than light. How will you replenish this energy? Many spacecraft obtain it from the sun, which serves as their refueling station.. ⛽I forgot that information is kept from the public.🙊 I shouldn't have mentioned the other ships in space. Say goodbye to your loved ones. The consequence of traveling for one hour at the speed of light and then returning another hour, is a demonstration of Einstein's theory, which he established as fact..👽👾

[RichardRhodes-rq]

We are expanding in this universe at 1.5 million miles an hr. 30 million miles a day. Further and further away from yesterday.
Around our star at 450, 000 miles an hr. Spinning at a thousand miles an hr.
And we don't even feel it until we drink too much booze

[MrLandolph]

The expansion of space itself already exceeds the speed of light, so whatever void the universe is expanding inside of proves the possibility of accelerating beyond the speed of light. Whether humans will ever develop the technology to manipulate the fabric of the universe is debatable/doubtful but theoretically, it is possible.

[Myrslokstok]

Lets start with traveling around our solarsystem 1% of lightspeed would be enormus!

[Snailmailtrucker]

At the 33:18 mark you state that the US Challenger Disaster occurred during Re-Entry...
*Wrong it exploded during Liftoff !*
I was watching it !

[progressivefrog]

Just a thought: The first actual evidence that light propagates in waves was discovered around 1800. The first real, manipulated use of light in the form of lasers was invented around 160 years later, around 1960.
The first actual evidence of gravity waves was discovered in 2016. The alubari type drive depends upon warping space around an object in much the same way that gravity does. I note below that there's a lot of skepticism around that possibility, and as a scientist, I agree that skepticism is, indeed, very reasonable. But what could happen if we can actually concentrate and control gravitational waves in much the same way as a laser does light waves? If it takes 160 years for that to happen, none of us will find out the answer. But, skeptics, please consider that possibility. At one time, I recall reading that someone calculated that humans couldn't travel faster than 25 MPH.

[WilliamKeiser-dd]

There is always a way around everything even physics and just because we don't know something doesn't mean it isn't there or is not possible all things are possible all you got to do is figure it out and how many times you got to wait for something to be invented to have something else that needed that something for it to be invented so we're usually one invention or two inventions away of having something really big always just like time travel is not possible if you have enough energy it is possible and just because we don't know how to make that much energy and compacted down to where we can use it doesn't mean somebody else Mike or some other civilization Mike that's been around for a couple million years longer than us and has managed not to kill itself off like we probably will as we are always trying to kill each other here instead of working together for a common good cuz we don't know how to be selfless and know that we're all brothers and sisters on this planet but unfortunately most of us are too damn sick headed to even know what side is up or just too damn ignorant to know it

[mattholden]

If you're going to have an AI narrate your plagiarized content, you should at least fact-check its accuracy.

[petergibson]

Every single second our own sun generates the energy output of about 2 BILLION Tsar Bombs (The most powerful Soviet Hydrogen-Bomb explosion.)
Humanity has a LOT of work to do before we can hope to harness the energy of 2 billion hydrogen bombs exploding every second.

[kaavyasri]

As per mass-speed relationship from Einstein general relativity, as speed increases, mass must increase. This means, mass opposing increase in speed. From where this increased mass coming from? Does energy change into mass? If so, whose energy? Energy of object or surroundings? If E of object decreases to increase its mass, (E/m) must decrease thus square of C (speed of light) must decrease. So, if we make light to travel with speed less than C by some means, we can compete with light.

[muntee]

Energy mass equivalence is just a means to reinterpret the EM phenomenon in a manner which can be represented in various other ways with particle physics. Otherwise the energy contained in the atoms nucleus would make them to orders of magnitude more massive. Think how much energy must be imparted on matter to give it kinetic energy, now compare that with the energy released when the nucleus is forced to undergo fission.

[Helgardt]

Humanly impossible…will not happen any time soon.

[leightapex]

Aside from the obvious problems with faster than light travel (which are enormous) there’s still one bugger that wont go away. Eventually, you’re going to run into something and wreck your ship. And the faster you go, the less time you’ll have to steer to avoid it. And, the faster you go, the smaller that object needs to be in order to do severe damage. At even a decent fraction of the speed of light if you hit a little pebble, the kinetic energy involved would equal the detonation of a nuclear weapon. If you’re up close to the speed of light, it’s probably like a star exploding. Not fun. And yeah yeah, then it just moves on to “well, there would need to be some sort of field or shield to deflect stuff and on and on and on. You go down that road of having to posit some real big “if”’s.

What’s better than worrying about trying to break physics by moving something faster than the speed of light let’s just consider how nice it would be to figure out how to travel at say, hundreds of thousands of miles per hour instead of just tens of thousands like we do with today’s chemical rockets. The ion drive is a proven system that can probably get up there in speed, but it takes a dang lifetime to get there. So, not a great solution.

A quick, easy way to get up to like 250k mph would change everything. We could zip to the moon in an hour and be back before lunch. Crazy! Fire off to Mars and maybe a jog around Jupiter in a couple of weeks. Amazing.

I’d like the start there.

[GeorgeNoX]

I have been doing it for years in Elite Dangerous, do it like they do there and you got me convinced

[steve]

They redefined the meter slightly to make the speed of light EXACTLY 300, 000 kilometers per second. That's now the definition of the meter. :-)

[steve]

They redefined the meter slightly so that the speed of light is EXACTY 300 thousand kilometers per second. This defines the meter in terms of the second. :-)