Supreme Court Upholds EPA Rule Amidst Project 2025's Challenge

preview_player
Показать описание
Project 2025 aims to stop enforcing specific laws by placing employees in agencies that will block or avoid implementing existing rules. Recently, they challenged an EPA rule, asking the Supreme Court to halt it while the case moved through the courts. Despite the lengthy legal process, the Supreme Court decided not to block the rule, allowing it to stand for now, with future decisions pending.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

if the Republican enablers get their way there will be no enforcement of any laws that impede them from making money.

goosegoose
Автор

Write down every one of those involved with Project 2025 and let the citizens know who they are and what they wanted to do to the American people.

CSmith-ozwp
Автор

Water, Air act Local. Be involved...because you're AFFECTED. Toxic Speculators Not Welcome

HoneyBadger
Автор

Good post. Thx. What I want to know… who is “Big Oil” who are donating to maga/gop? Which specific companies? Please name them. I wish to know which oil companies are working solely for their own benefit and against the people.
I want to know which Oil companies to not purchase fuel from ever again!! I’m tired of the bs.

dbird
Автор

Dina, you should’ve mentioned what the rule was that was being disputed in the short.

soaringeagle
Автор

Very well observed.

And it may only be coincidence, but I can't help but notice a slow popular trend toward denying services on religious grounds, the sovereign citizen movement, various kinds of acting out on a naive sense of entitlement.

Protest is great when there are thoughtful grounds for it, sound matters of principle. But this other thing, the automatic oppositional reflex, the incuriousity, that's concerning to me.

starfishsystems
Автор

You need to post more context. I have no idea what rule she's talking about.

GvInit
Автор

I plugged my nose, sent heritage found. (Intended sic) my own $36, purchased monstrosity, as soon as released. Though appears dense—the chapters on every sector of public life/law, are written in middle school text. Assume all citation sources, authors are to be involved—again, oddly, each chp. has different author + gaggle of living sources. All miss schooler’s, in simple text, are able to lay-out the facts, add a bit of terrifying ‘color’ to essays. Someone suggests keeping track of all facts, pertaining to these allegedy, population-calming, legal & rhetorical rulings and statements. Taking names, in my opinion, is an excellent idea.

Are they truly so detached to believe the MAJORITY will just melt into their abyss so easily? IDTS! I’m not going anywhere without a fight! 🇺🇸❤️⚖️📖❤️🗳️‼️‼️💙‼️🥊

Such an ancient Play Book—one that at very best, gave Franco, what 62 (?) years… certainly NOT resistance free! Such a stupid, tired idea (12th-13th centuries, Italy). Never has, nor will, be a viable way to “govern.” Especially in such a lg country… “One Religious Government Will Not Hold, ” nor will isolationism. Oh, and the fact that by next generation, white men will no longer be a majority demographic. It’s currently white women who are. If Obama ever needed to scold any demographic; it is them. Imo.
Thx for keeping current legal movement connected for us! 💪🏽🇺🇸❤️⚖️📖‼️🗳️‼️💙‼️

annkat
Автор

Tar and feathers to give them a taste of living in fuel poisoned environments.

eonoe
Автор

Useless video unless she states what is the rule she is referring to!

lindaj
Автор

Time for Biden immunity and martial law.

joemalonski