The Peer Review Process

A tutorial describing the peer review process.

The Peer Review Process by Western Libraries is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License:

[Ryezen]

@David S: The peer review process isn't meant to be a twitter-fast release of information. If you disagree with a "certain journal", you can do you own research that challenges the ideas presented and, if you include proper support, references, and data, you may have your article published. If you just want to voice personal opinion in protest, you should probably contact the article's author or editor of the journal.

[mitchqqqqqq]

It would be nice if the UWO online library was a bit easier to navigate to find peer reviewed material.

[Lisili]

You should specify the title, this is a very specific and narrow perspective on peer reviews (publishing in the scientific world). It might be confusing to viewers, who want to know what peer review is and how it works, cause this is just one possibility to use peer reviews.

[davidstrudwick]

What happens when you do not agree with a certain journal?based on theory?maybe you have your own theory which should be considered? surely this process is not 21st century and should be reviewed and more open minded or we could be starting the next dark age....thanx

[sdfjsd]

Librarian: "Ahh. Isn't it so nice that in this brutal digital world, the children still find interest in books."
Children play video games on the library's computers instead 🤣

I heard that joke from an old friend