Lecture 12 - King Arthur - a Knights Templar story

Who was King Arthur? Ralph has researched all of Arthurian history, and come to some logical but very radical conclusions. Could this ancient story have been brought to northern Europe by the Knights Templar? Are you prepared to have your view of Arthurian Legend changed forever?

These videos have been extracted from The King Jesus Trilogy….

Ralph Ellis Website:

Ralph Ellis Facebook:

Donate to Ralph Ellis on:

Ralph

[funkycatholic]

As a Christian, even though I view a lot of Ralph's ideas as somewhat eccentric and I am not convinced by them, I still find it fascinating to see what could be maybe a real alternative history. Keep it up Ralph.

[filipepiedade]

I absolutely devour your wisdom. Found you recently and can’t stop watching videos of you. Bought two of your books and I am start to scratch the surface. I come from a religious Christian background (cult) and always found the bible rely hard to understand. The links that you provide make so much sense!! Thank you for your research and thank you for sharing it!

[georgialenny]

Everytime I listen to your lectures I have a "my whole life has been a lie" moment.

[MitchellBjerke]

Thankyou dear Ellis. Much love pours from you in your work blessing our own souls, if I may speak for myself anyway.

Hail warrior king Issa Manu Arthur!

[songohan]

Thank you for giving us the true history back. Enjoyed every one of your books. Stay safe. Cheers from Mexico City. 👍

[Samulisami]

Wow did this blow my mind! Thank you for the lecture. Very interesting stuff.

[craft-o-matic]

What can I say @Ralph Ellis You surely must be the most fascinating man on Earth. Another excellent presentation and, as always, I am looking forward to the next.
Take care, Lisa

[alexjames]

Another splendid lecture, Ralph. I don't know when I will be able to read the Grail Cypher, but this lecture got me to thinking about Peter and the Galileans, and how the term peter came to be associated with peckers; now I know there's just got to be a connection to the eunuchs with this.

[fairlylocal]

You're the only other person besides Ammon Hillman that I've heard mention the young naked boy with Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane...it would be interesting to get both you guys on a podcast...

[debeholland]

Lately with all the Stolen History & Rewritten History, its refreshing that someone researches outside the box to search for the truth! thank you

[twohundredyearstogetherale]

I would say this is one of the best presentations published on this channel so far. By the way, Mr. Ellis, I first came across your research a couple of years ago, when I was searching for information on ancient Egypt, the Exodus and the Hyksos. Since then, I have listened my way through just about every single interview with you available here on YT, and I have also read most of the Kindle edition of Jesus: Last of the Pharaohs.

Having a "somewhat academic" background, and a fairly relevant education, the details of which I prefer not to disclose here, I am probably in a better position to evaluate your claims than many, and I think you could be, and likely are, onto something of immense significance, and with momentous implications -- as you yourself already know very well, of course.

I suppose one of the problems facing anyone desiring to communicate this to others is that the historical reality that is now emerging, that you have enabled your readers to see the contours of, is so outrageous, so fantastically bizarre, compared to what we have been taught, and to what we have been and to some extent still are taking for granted, that it will be extremely difficult for many people to make the mental leap in terms of worldview that is required to comprehend it.

I have a few questions for you, though. One of the more pressing ones is that the picture you paint of the Hyksos, which was probably developed several decades ago, is in some respects a little difficult to reconcile with the results of the Austrian archaeological excavations in Avaris, presented in Manfred Bietak's detailed 1995 report Avaris: Capital of the Hyksos. The findings published in that report, available online, appear to make it very clear, for example, that the Hyksos were not native Egyptians, but Semitic-speaking foreigners from Palestine and the Levant (then viewed as part of "Asia", as you know). Furthermore, it seems that they were actually worshipers of Seth, who may have been represented by the donkey. So I am curious to know how you have, or would, integrate the discoveries made in Avaris into your thesis.

I would also like to see an even more thorough and even better corroborated presentation of your claim that Titus Flavius Josephus and St. Paul/Saul are in fact the same person. The similarities between the two, such as that of the shipwreck, are intriguing, but I am not yet convinced. As someone once said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and the claim that a single Israelite, Josephus, may have forged -- in both a literal and a metaphorical sense -- the religion and the worldview of the next two thousand years in the West, is so incredible that it has to be even better substantiated.

Thank you!

[dockarlita]

I had to pause the video to laugh when you said tossers"! I appreciate the all new information too. Thank you for your work.

[ralph.wahldren]

This talk is superb, packed with facts and hard data awesome, thanks Superralph!

[annbouchard]

Amazing Ralph, you never seize to amaze me.

[felicededuyo]

Clear voice. Clear explanation. Very logical. From the clear mind of Sir Ralph. Thank you for illuminating my mind.

[rebeljesus]

Great Stuff, had to check the Great Bear fact; Arcturian - close enough :D Loving it

[christinepreston]

I keep coming back to your videos Ralph. When You mention Constantine the 3rd, I did wonder if you have heard of George Jowett and his work 'The Drama of the Lost Disciples'. It's online on videos as well.

Constantine the Great's [not the 3rd] he says - was 'posted' in Britain. His name was Constantius the Great and Jowett has identified his concubine Helena as British. Constantine would not have had a dream about a cross because his father knew the symbol. He was in a Roman cult that used it [?].

He explains the situation from Claudius up to the Diocletian persecutions [up to 300 or so] when the British Institutions were wiped out and that's probably why nothing is known about the Druids.

The records from ancient authors indicate there were 'universities' and about 60, 000 students - he says. And they had the capital at York if I remember well. Constantius Chrlorus defended the Britons against the Roman invasion although he was posted there [at the time there were 4 Augustus Caesars - but I read this in the 1980s]

Then Constantine, who became the Great, gathered an army from Britain [after Constantius died, and having inherited a title], crossed the channel, and fought against the Romans and took Rome. Then he became Emperor and it was one a few years before the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. And Jowett basically argued that Constantine inherited his Christianity from his mother Helena who was a Christian - not of Roman Christianity that appears later or arrives in Britain with Augustine - but the New Covenant that was taught from Avalon and already existed in 42 AD because it was the reason that Claudius decreed to have all people descendant from King David murdered. Jowett says there was a teaching coming from Avalon - a new Covenant - the teachings of Christ - and that there existed an Old Covenant, due to the fact that the Tribe of Ephraim and perhaps Manasseh had come to Britain - and Joseph of Arimathea had mines in Cornwall, Devon, and Somerset. There is the record in the Domesday book that a piece of land was given to him and he was exempt of taxes [the entry is for 63 AD]. In 156 AD a King Lucius founded a British National Church, and it developed later as the Celtic Church or Celtic Christianity which is different in its beliefs from the Christianity of Paul or constantine with the doctrine of sacrifice and changes made later by the Council, and all their anathema such as against Origen of Alexandria. They made calls to Archangel Michael just as the community did to this archangel and Melchizedek as recorded in the Dead Sea Scrolls which don't mention a sacrifice on the cross.

The Celtic Church seems to have some characteristics similar to the free masons [or what we superficially hear about them from the subject of the American Constitution of 1776], and you know a lot about Freemasonry, so I wonder whether that heterodox Church's theology or concepts were preserved in Freemasonry, or distorted with time. And I wonder whether its concepts were similar to those of the Eastern Church which separated from the Western Church. Theologically, the Council of Nicaea was the start of Christianity as we know it, with Constantine forcing the doctrine of sacrifice upon the bishops who were Gnostic... although it's traced to Paul /Saul [Flavius Josephus?]. There is worse with the 'fallen angel' theory. I have identified an error of interpretation and have a solution to solve a dilemma relating to the term 'angel' being used in the Septuagint for the term which the Masoretic text translates as 'bene haelohim'. And I say 'translate' because the masoretic text which is referred to as the 'Hebrew Original' can only be dated to the 9th century AD after Christ. They took 1000 years to codify it after the Septuagint and the original proto-masoretic text is lost. I have uncovered some falsifications carried out by the Jews following their return from captivity in Babylonia, and I think truth has been suppressed re King Solomon.

And this story about Constantius Chlorus sounds like what you have stated about Constantine the 3rd. So has Jowet got it wrong? Or is the idea that this event of conquest was in relation to Constantine the 3rd wrong? He disagrees with scholars' identification of Helena as well. I looked into some records for my video 'The Crushing of the Druids' but it might be one of those that the 'uploader' has removed. We have it on a disc [channel ascension] so will re-upload it.

[dezzab]

Thank you so much!! I can’t get enough of this. Reading the vulgate cycle now along with your books!

[charlesroyal]

This was amazing. I love your lectures. Cant wait for more.
Do you have a chronology of the life of the historic Jesus and Mary?


I have bought your book Solomon and its very thought provoking!

[BRTaylor]

I agree with this analysis. Excellent work.