How to Edit Out ChatGPT-isms With This Tool

In this video we're talking about how to edit out ChatGPT-isms or AI-isms, meaning the common issues that AI has, using a program like Autocrit, which will automatically highlight poor word choices and other things that you might want to fix.

My Top AI Tools:

Find me!

[velladay]

Just signed up using your link. It's an amazing product. Thanks!

[AntoineBandele]

This was a really good video in terms of craft.

[biancastephanie]

Ahhh thank you!!! I use a mix of pro writing aid and Auto crit!

[Lichslave]

Would you recommend this or pro writing aid more?

[philipashane]

Really interesting. Could this be used with blog writing? Does it happen to have that as a genre (I’m guessing not) and/or can you upload text for it to use as a reference to compare against your own writing? (Like I could upload blog entries by a blogger whose writing I like?)

[milestrombley]

It has a free plan, which is essential for authors. But how much can you use with the free plan?

[TheUberSchattenjager]

Could this be tool be useful for historical, reference, or other non-fiction works?

[tke-nationupsilonpi]

Does it have an option to change it for you or suggest word changes or do you have to change the words yourself ? Thx

[GenderPunkJezebelle]

Just reading the samples on the screen, I can see a lot of really stiff, stilted sentence structures that autocrit doesn't seem to be flagging.

You might want to compare against a vampire fiction author instead of an author who writes primarily epic fantasy if you're writing a Dracula sequel .

Epic fantasy tends to be more formal and use somewhat more sophisticated vocabulary, whereas vampire fiction tends to either be more atmospheric, more contemporary, or both.

I read a lot of vampire fiction, and if I picked this up and read a sample, I would put it down pretty quick

[Paikoun]

Does it give suggestions to fix the issue it showed?

[tavaroevanis]

Can you train Autocrit using samples of your own writing?

[JimSmith-opvu]

I followed your link to AutoCrit and was surprised by the cost—nearly $350 cost. I understand that the program wouldn't be free, but it would have been helpful if you had mentioned the price upfront. I enjoy your videos and have learned a lot from them, but this felt a bit off. It might have been better to present the information more transparently. Just a thought.

[guybernadet]

Very interesting tool. It's sad it doesn't seem to support other languages than English.

[dimitryanyanwu]

Does this replace the use of a novel editor?

[marcotronic]

Thanks! Too bad this only works for the English language (I just asked their support).

[GeologyDude]

AI is terribly flawed for technical information. I find it mostly correct for general science information, but ridiculously and laughably incorrect regarding the more detailed information

[michaelarturo]

Autocrit is usable for those writing in genres. Otherwise useless, besides expensive.

[toreon]

That is incorrect. The numbers in the Report are normalized!

[kylewilzon]

Hey whats up. I was wondering if you plan on testing Grok for writing?