Kant Vs the Ontological Argument

preview_player
Показать описание
Go look at Malcom’s Ontological Argument to see if Kant survives
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

LMAOO the dad jokes are awesome! I've been watching videos on this all day and this is the only video that has helped me.

angelailievaa
Автор

I don't even know how I got here from googling House af Munsö

rullvardi
Автор

0:02 The English (not 'Merkin) abbreviation for _versus_ is _v_, not _vs_ .

frogandspanner
Автор

Honestly the only video I have seen that has helped me understand Kant and his waffle

ellenjonesbedward
Автор

1:03 The triangle is true only within the domain of discourse of the Euclidean axioms of geometry - it is not true in all of Riemannian Space. I deny that all the angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees as I operate in Riemann Space. All non-redundant axioms restrict the domain of discourse, and the ontological argument restricts the domain to the infinitesimal.

Of course, all of the language used in philosophy is cant, and god-botherers are especially stupid cants.

frogandspanner