'I Think, Therefore God Exists' | The Ontological Argument (AFG #5)

preview_player
Показать описание
The Ontological Argument, as presented by thinkers such as Anselm, Descartes, Malcolm and Lane Craig, attempts to prove the existence of God using reason alone. It's a rare example of a deductive argument in favour of God that references no empiricism, but does it hold up?

@CosmicSkeptic

-----------------------------------------LINKS/SOURCES-----------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LINKS:

Snapchat: cosmicskeptic
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Can a Muslim god create a bacon cheeseburger so baconey that he can't eat it?

HolyKoolaid
Автор

Two Cosmic Skeptic videos in 24 hours? The gods have smiled upon us all! er...you know what I mean.

GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic
Автор

Apologist: God is beyond comprehension.

Also Apologist: I understand God.

kendehl
Автор

Philosophy of religion should be a requirement for all students. Logical arguments and their construction train the mind to be spectacular.

thehound
Автор

The ontological argument. More like the onto-not-so-logical argument, am I right?

Anyone?

CosmicSkeptic
Автор

"To Christopher hitchens losing a debate" hahaha classic

SNIPERSHOT
Автор

It's more like "If God could possibly exist, then he must certainly exist."

russmoose
Автор

"...to Christopher Hitchens losing a debate is theoretically possible though logically incoherent..."
Precious.

bruceshand
Автор

a married bachelor can exist if bachelor is the family name.

laughinghaunter
Автор

This poorly reasoned and childish argument simply attempts to "wish" god into being. Hitch's razor applies... "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence".

Constantstate
Автор

You just covered 20% if my alevel philosophy exam lol you’re better than my teacher

timiadefolu
Автор

Quick solution if presented with the argument:
"I can imagine a universe where there is no god, all events occur from natural events and random chance. If god is omnipotent and must therefor exist in all possible universes then by the fact of one universe not containing god, that must mean none do."

Simple, just use their own circular logic against them. That is the eternal flaw of arguments based in circular logic.

syd
Автор

"I can imagine something, therefore it is real."

Brickerbrack
Автор

I still can't wrap my head around how the ontological argument persuades anyone who has graduated high school.

MarkPalmerISP
Автор

You can imagine a world where I have all perfections. Existence is a perfection. A being with all perfections is god. Therefore, I am god.

SpaveFrostKing
Автор

It would be so fucking scary if ostriches could fly

Andrea-ysgv
Автор

Can Jesus microwave a burrito so hot, that he himself could not eat it?

kresimirbozic
Автор

0:29 an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent being that helps starving children is greater than God, but isn't God. Ontological argument refuted.

mariochartouni
Автор

Did you really say "If God exists, then there would be an objective moral standard"?

That's bunk. There would be God's subjective moral standard, and he would definitely have the power to enforce it, but that's about it.

Wveth
Автор

You are one of the most amazing YouTuber i have come across, really love the way you present your argument so simply, precisely and accurately!

zchowdhury