The Tudor Ranger - Is This The Best Watch Yet?

preview_player
Показать описание
Tudor Ranger hands on video. Was really excited about this minimalist expedition watch and it did not disappoint.

Watch Straps by HIRSCH

Enjoy!

Get a discount on watches from Chronext - Code: NIKOLAUS

Check out my other social channels:

DailyNi Season 1 Ep. 127

#tudor #tudorranger #tudorwatch

Chapters:
0:00 Intro
1:13 Tudor Ranger
2:10 Overal Look and Style
3:20 Tudor Ranger on different Straps
5:00 Outro
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I bought it and love it, agree about being a strap monster, especially blues, greens, and beige . They all seem to pick up the dial color. Some hate the pistachio tone, but I think this is contributing to its flexibility.

jmw
Автор

I bought it and loved it. I bought the ranger at almost the same month that I bought the IWC mark XX. Turn out, I wear the ranger more often than my IWC mark xx.

yiny
Автор

I think the Ranger at 39mm and the way it looks is a great watch. But I would have preferred it slightly smaller at 37.5mm, a rose over the “Tudor” on the dial and slightly thinner plus a domed crystal either plexiglass or sapphire option. I like that in Speedmasters that you can choose which crystal you want. Plexi is a great option as it’s easy to polish up and cheap to replace if needed. Also a more vintage looking crown would have made it better. Anyway I got one at a very good price and will keep it at least for a while….!

truxton
Автор

Hello 👋 totally agree, great watch, great price and a strap monster 😉

konstantinosargyropoulos
Автор

I think Tudor hit the right size on this watch. If this watch were 36-37mm it would be too small for my wrist which is 19mm or 7 1/2". At 39mm it appears to be a small watch to me but just big enough for me to wear. I'm enjoying mine and it's a watch that needs to be put on the wrist to make a good judgement on.

roamy
Автор

It’s a well divided watch. But I personally love it. Unfortunately all the places I know have a waiting list… ridiculous. 😅

HoneyString
Автор

I have one. I have three small scratches on the crystal. It must have an anti glare coating. Bad choice for a tool watch. Love the watch hate the scratches

shannonkruse
Автор

It's a solid option but I prefer applied markers. Still appropriate for the price.

sebastien
Автор

Mir gefällt die Ranger der gut, leider zu klein für mich. Cooles Video

harryliebling
Автор

I have this watch and I love it, however - The Monta Triumph is 2mm thinner and has 50m more WR and a sapphire case back. Also better case finishing and half the price! They just need to tweak the dial layout…

Motibreva
Автор

Only boring people with boring taste will call this boring. They can't see beyond simplicity and know nothing a model's heritage.
Well...haters will always hate...

russellseah
Автор

I agree with Valera Scotland…slightly smaller and thinner would be a winner…little too much empty dial but I like the watch anyway 🤷‍♂

steves
Автор

Just nabbed a brand new Ranger on a Black Friday deal for $2, 052!!!!

Kam-Bogey
Автор

This is very personal. I tried it on and for me, its far too big and thick for a field watch. This in 36-37mm, 10mm thick would be great (with a more interesting dial).
But yes . Each to their own

Valera_Scotland
Автор

Great looking watch, a shame it's not 43mm ;)

MisterKnightly
Автор

37 to 38 mm would make the whole package even better and the dial more coherent. Thickness isn't great for a simple 3 hand watch.

ronpower
Автор

crap design, crap brand, crap name. you left just with performance. then I can say Tissot even better!

likeris