Who was the real Ashoka, the Great? ;#Sattology, Dr Raja Ram Mohan Roy

preview_player
Показать описание
Please watch this video to learn interesting insights on 'Who was the real Ashoka, the Great? ;#Sattology, Dr Raja Ram Mohan Roy'.

#Ashoka #History #Real #Debunking #Mythology

Disclaimer: All discussions are purely Academic & Educational from the viewpoint of Vedas. Free Speech is guaranteed in US Constitution. All discussions are intended to promote and protect the Human Rights & History of natives. We take extreme precautions in discussing different view points of scholars/analysts.

Urgent Appeal: Subscribe to Sattology & Don't forget to press THE BELL ICON to never miss any updates.

Support us to help spread the knowledge of Sanatana Dharma.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sattology means science of truth. Sattology is an antonym of Mythology.

Follow us on Social Media:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Dr. Roy presents a fascinating alternative. Some 30 years ago, I came across something similar in the work of a south Indian scholar Kota Venkat Chelam.

kanchhediachamaar
Автор

This one was enlightening. The excitement is on the increase.☺️☺️
When are we going to get the episode on Raja Vikramaditya? Thank you.

shobhagujjar
Автор

Sir it means that chandragupta empire was had area like Kalinga and south Indian states

photoloveshayari
Автор

I would be grateful if Dr. Roy would let me know how his research has been received by the mainstream and whether he has been able to persuade the mainstream historians to revise their chronology.

kanchhediachamaar
Автор

According to Wikipedia entry on Ashoka, Christopher Beckwith, a philologist at Indiana University, does not think that Devanampiya of rock edicts is Ashoka. I would be grateful if Dr. Roy would comment on that.

kanchhediachamaar
Автор

Pls bring and discuss this with Dr Sanjeev Sanyal as he has also done some studies in Ashoka 🙏🏻

How reliable/validated are the interpretations of Hultzsch & the Chinese writers including those converted Buddhism?

pitlaman
Автор

Thats a real set of match the following type of analysis approach to demystifying.

ksrinivasaithal
Автор

Maybe devanampiya piyadasi is a kalashoka or devrakshit king.. But i think, the problem in greek chronology.. Also.. Because reference point Cristian era (year 0) is not trustable.. I think we must forget the Christian era completely...then we have reliable chronology..we need to find concrete reference point like comet visit to earth, earthquakes, or any natural activities who recorded in many parts of ancient civilizations...

rakeshthinks
Автор

It might be fascinating to invite mainstream historians for a debate with Dr. Roy. I would be grateful if Dr. Roy would let me know whether an account of his interactions with mainstream historians is available online.

kanchhediachamaar
Автор

this stories are totally wrong.samrat Ashok was great ruler of world

PB-uwdo