Am I Racist? REVIEW - Matt Walsh's New Film(?)

Spoilers: yes.

✔ SUPPORT ✔

✔ OTHER PLATFORMS ✔

✔ SOCIAL MEDIA ✔

✔ SHOP ✔

✔ OTHER PROJECTS ✔

✔ CONTACT ✔
▶Mail: Jessie Earl
PO BOX 85787
Seattle, WA 98145

[kellyloganme]

Mirror universe Mat(hilda) Walsh released their latest film "What is a Racist?", following on the heels of the underground sensation, "Am I a Woman?"

[BradDavis_vr]

minor nit... Kazakhstan (where Borat is supposedly from) is not "middle eastern".

[Iolas-rein]

Matt Walsh: everyone's afraid to review my documentary
Also Matt Walsh: copyright strikes anyone who reviews his documentary

[Tareltonlives]

"Review my movie! No, not like that! I meant uncritical praise!"

[mulukh]

"sounds like cope"

Yes, yes it does.

"but this time it's true"

That just sounds even more like cope!

[mikearchibald]

Um, doesn't anybody think its odd that he's 'going undercover' and yet with somebody standing there filming the thing. Don't people realize you can hire actors to pretend they aren't acting?

[NotaUserIam]

One of the most hilarious scenes I’ve ever seen in a movie when he tricked her into giving him money. I couldn’t stop laughing

[KBparsi]

Borat is a character based in Kazakhstani, that is a central Asian country, it's racist to assume his character as middle eastern because of his physical attributes. Shame on you.

[elgranespejo]

Small point but relevant to discussions on race: Kazakhstan is actually the most northern central Asian republic, just south of Russia. It’s a former Soviet republic with a history that’s more Eurasian than middle eastern, except for the influence of Islam

[danniruthvan]

"What is a woman?"
"Am I a racist?"
What's the rhetorical question going to be for the title of his next film?

[FinntasticMrFox]

I'm so baffled by the fact that TDW has millions and millions of dollars, but they won't buy Matthew a second wig.

[ckwordly]

"I'm going to review the film separate from how i personally feel about Matt Walsh"
Spends the entire video talking about personal feelings about Matt Walsh and his viewerbase....

[csurname]

I'm a long-haired guy who's more progressive than Matt could understand (not a difficult bar to clear), but from my experience, I don't get how his wig makes for a liberal stereotype. They did the same in Mr. Birchum, I think it's something about "hipsters" from 15 years ago?

[laurenalexander]

Maybe it's the dyslexia, or maybe it's cause I know Walsh too well, but I can't not read the title as "I Am Racist"

[_.oOo._]

One of the things that irritates me the most about this movie is that he really thought just putting on a wig the same color as his actual hair but long and tied back would make him into some kind of iconic sjw liberal Borat character but like he just looks like Matt Walsh with long hair

[bradigan]

The newest installment in Matt Walsh's neverending quest for a gender affirming haircut.

[Tejroe]

Truth is, Jeremy Jahns gave what is in my opinion a real unbiased review of the film. It’s hard to imagine this review as unbiased when you say, in response to Walsh manipulating a race grifter to give $30 to a black person as reparations, that it’s ignoring the wider context of how reparations is a step toward building solutions to racism in this country. It’s not trying to build a context for this, it’s trying to make fun of a race grifter. Borat didn’t meet with a bunch of Trump supporters to try mend the divisiveness of the country through ideals, or even set the tone or basis for that, he just wanted to mock their idiocy.
Another commenter said it best; is your criticism that Walsh didn’t take these race grifters seriously enough? Imagine a conservative reviewing Borat and saying “Borat was insincere when he spoke with the Trump supporters, and didn’t address the key issues that Trump supporters have; rather he just found the stupidest ones and mocked them by giving them an open mic.” That conservative would be correct, but woefully ignorant to the idea of what constitutes a satirical comedy. A stark difference between the two is that the Trump supporters Borat made fun of were in positions of low-information ideologues, while the race grifters Walsh made fun of were in positions of power.

[ignisproductions]

You missed the point entirely, min 8:57 the point is that DEI instructors are grifters by charging “30k” for a presentation and sit around on chairs or 5K for a dinner to be told that there is no fix. That is the point of the movie another DEI instructor was charging 10k+ and it was a whiteboard presentation. Then he went online and got certified. The point of that is that he went through the training and proves that anyone can be a DEI expert as he mentions in the movie.

Then about the Borat of the right, I think that only applies to the last scene were he pushes to see how far it can go.

[TrentRyanKatzenberger]

I've been seeing commercials for the Sylvester Stallone vehicle - Tulsa King. And, maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but I could swear to God that they have hired Matt Walsh to play a character in season 2.

[JoshLand-xlle]

It's never meant to be about racism. It's about hiring people who deserve the job