Double Your Money The Smart Way - Upgraded Martingale Betting System

Unlock the secrets of the Martingale Betting System.

Learn how this roulette strategy can potentially yield profits, while also understanding the casino's countermeasures that make it a risky proposition. Discover an upgraded approach that puts you back in control and reduces the chance of wiping out your bank balance.

By patiently waiting for a sequence of three consecutive even chance results (such as red or black, high or low, odd or even), our recommended strategy mitigates the risk of a devastating losing streak. This calculated twist to the traditional Martingale system ensures that you enter the game with a minimum bet, safeguarding against unfavorable outcomes. While no system is foolproof, our approach significantly lowers the likelihood of encountering an improbable losing streak.

Remember:
Exercise caution and avoid overplaying the Martingale system. Set a realistic profit target, like $20 or $30, and exercise discipline by exiting the game once you reach it. Remember, continuous and unrestricted play may eventually expose you to the remote possibility of an unrecoverable loss.

For more roulette systems check out this video:

[Sbigsla]

This is literally a textbook example of gamblers not understanding the concept of independent events. While it is far less likely to get 10 in a row than 7 in a row, when you see three in a row and start you have the exact same statistical chance of hitting 7 bad draws in a row that you would have if you started not knowing anything about the previous 3.

[BlueGillage]

Beware. Long streaks of 15+ on any outside bet are not as rare as people think. Its quite common.

[drzpapi]

I wait for a pattern of 6. Units are 100. Stop loss is at 1500. I only do 1 win per session. (Casino is 5 minutes away from me). Once I get one win, I leave. I go daily to the casino, sometimes twice a day earning me anywhere from 3, 500 to 4, 500 a month.
I put aside a Bankroll and pocket the rest. Also, i get tons of free play because of the amount of action i lay down. I have days where i hit my 100 quota with the free play.
Do i wipe out? Yes. It happens. But it's worked out to where I've made up a bankroll and then some before wiping out.

For those who want to try this, start with 75, 5 units. Play for 5 wins. Per session. Stick to the rule of 6 patterns. When you get to 150, unit becomes 10. 225, unit=15, 300, unit=20, 375, unit=25 and continue the trend. Once you're at 25 unit, the one win per session rule kicks in.
Gamble responsibly.

[choicesbets]

I agree, the Martingale strategy is a very tricky one and can easily wipe out your bankroll.

[Nyruami]

You literally just used the gambler´s fallacy and made a strategy out of it. It doesn´t make the slightest difference if you enter a table just whenever you feel like it or if you wait for one single chance to hit 3 times before you enter. One in 127 runs will lose. The result of prior spins has no impact on the result of the next spin. As you win 126x your basic bet in the runs that win, while losing 127 basic bets when you lose, you simply can´t win. You can even enter a table after 6 red numbers in a row and bet on red and it won´t change the outcome.

[davidmars]

I like how a traget goal of say $30 dollars is when you stop playing. I always accept the fact that I will lose my bankroll while playing and then it's less of a blow when or if it does happen. If you have a larger bankroll starting with $10 and a Goal of $50 to say, then thatis also a pretty safe way of playing after a 3 hit. Good viedo and yes 10 hits of the same color do happen and it is scary lol.

[darrylkemp]

I do it 1st 12 and wait 8 spins without it landing on 1st 12 to play you make so much more money . For a bit more risk, i make 200 quid in about 20 minutes and stop

[Hedriks]

I've hit a run of 9 even 10 straight, more than a few times which has sent me in fury about the house. And what makes it even worse is that the Table limit is $100 max bet, which makes it so much harder. It means you have to start at $1 and/or 50c and you'll lose a big chunk of money trying to save 50c/$1.
Crooked the house is. If they want your money.... they'll grab it when they want.
The Martingale strategy is the most common and used system.... I don't use it anymore. I ignore straight colour runs now, they're just a trick!

[DJenesis]

I’ve lost all of my money doing this. Black hit 14 times in a row. It is a good system, but do not fool yourself into thinking that you will always win. The more patient you are tho, the better. Maybe wait until there is a pattern of seven or eight before playing.

[Mr_Punter_]

it is correct, doing so u will bet less times, instead than playing every single round, you will only play an average of 1 rounds every 8 (2 power of 3, waiting for a straight of 3 favorable results) so it works out but you will play less and so win less, but for sure also lose less

[matiasgutierrez]

I played for months like this example, and i saw many time streaks +17...

[andrewcharles]

I always wait for 5 in a row before I start the martingale. Made a lot of money doing that BUT it has hit 12 in a row more than once so always hit and run

[canhvu]

In roulette, with each spin start, the odds of falling into a box are always 1/37 (with a table with a zero), simply because when starting a new betting round, there is still only 1 marble and 37 cells, this will not change when starting with a new spin. Thus, the player is always at a disadvantage... Don't look for a strategy, it simply never exists. You have to believe it...

[JayB]

Theres only a couple ways to consistently come out ahead in Roulette. 1) "Reverse" Martingale System. 2) Clocking Spins, which can takes years to become constantly accurate. 3) Find a "biased" tabe & only place bets on the top 5 or 6 #'s

[angravante]

My friend John started betting at a $25 minimum roulette table because 7 reds in came out in a row. So he bet on black $25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 then he quit. The results: first 7 reds then 7 more reds, then a black on the 15th spin. He lost $1575. He was not happy but his next bet would have been $1600 and he would have lost that too and he would not have been able to bet $3200 (which would have won) after that because the table limit was $2000.

[Ciaolo]

What matters is that after 7 lost even bets of any kind, you hit the table limit. Skipping a roll doesn't do anything to the next rolls. And looking at the roulette wheel, it's clear that red and black are the most random bets ever, even with biased dealers. Therefore, betting on 10 consecutive rolls to not be all of the same color is meaningless.
In order to find a winning strategy, you should focus mainly on how much to bet, not on what. D'alembert is the best example of that.

[Giantsfan]

Actually, its not a 50/50 chance when you have a zero or double zero. Also, you gotta be aware of chops in color (red, black, red, black, or vice versa). I have witnessed 20 blacks in a row.

[helciobmello]

Nice channel! I beg to differ about the improvement you suggest on the Martingale system, though. The odds of having 7 reds in a row is 128 to one (let's ignore the 0 for the sake of simplicity) and of having 10 reds in a row is 1024. However there is what we call conditioned probability: the odds of having 10 reds in a row given that 3 have already happened are the same of having 7 reds in a row from the beginning, assuming that reds and blacks are equally likely.

[fefefilmprod]

I’ve seen it land on red 13 times in a row. It’s hard to double up that many times.

[buzzin]

But this strategy is pretty decent. Think about it, if we are playing heads or tails, and i use this strategy. Im basically saying all i need to do is win 1 out of 7, so you pick tails and i pick heads. You have to get tails 7 times in a row to beat me, while i just need to win once outta 7 times to be profit. What side would you rather be on ?