6 next-generation space stations...NASA's genius solution!

preview_player
Показать описание
6 next-generation space stations...NASA's genius solution!
HUGE THANKS TO:
======
How SpaceX Starbase SHOCKED NASA Artemis Team! NASA finally realized Starship better than SLS…

If the speed of the current fastest Tesla car is 408 kilometers an hour.
For Dragon Re-entry Capsule, it is over 27,359 kilometers an hour in orbit.
The changes in Starbase are actually measured by minutes!
It’s not exaggerated in the case that if your house is near Starbase, you fall asleep at night, then you wake up, everything seems to be different.
Yeah so this even shocked NASA’s Artemis Team.
Find out what we’re talking about as we get into today’s episode of Alpha Tech.
The April 20 event reminds the Nasa team about the similar one which happened last year in Kennedy Space Center's Pad 39B. Remember the Artemis I moon rocket blow out partly the infrastructure of its pad?
It seems to be luckier than SpaceX’s counterpart because it just tolerates a thrust as half of the thrust of 33 Raptor engines. In addition, the NASA team also has more time to wind down between two Artemis missions while they keep busy with tasks in terms of repair and upgrade.
6 next-generation space stations...NASA's genius solution!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

At the end I thought you were doing an ad for Amazon. Next second I realized you were not😂

pablobon
Автор

putting out content faster than the faa is putting out launch licenses

gforcepanda
Автор

Artificial gravity will be a must for long-term space station occupancy.

TheGhungFu
Автор

NASA MUST keep some elements of ISS going until a (US) commercial space station is ready. We MUST NOT have a period of years where we leave the occupancy of space to China, like we did when we had an extended period of time where we had to rely on the Russians to get to space.

jahenders
Автор

I worked with a guy who was with NASA for 20 years. He told me that NASA had all the mechanics for a rotating station figured out long ago.
The next station should implemented artificial gravity.

MYOB
Автор

By far the best way to go is once cargo starships get going, you go with the inflatable station route and get yourself something massive. Using actual starships themselves is a terrible idea because more than 2/3rds would be empty dead weight from fuel tanks, rockets, and the portion of the body they reside in.

zano
Автор

If NASA had bothered to take the external tanks into orbit - not only would it have consumed less fuel, but all that metric would already have been in orbit.

NormReitzel
Автор

Great Video and info ! The LEO Commercial Space Station (CSS) should be in an orbit heading East from KSC The orbit (about 28.5 deg.) is the same orbit that Apollo used to depart for the moon ! Also maybe some of the six (6) next-Generation space stations can join together to produce a larger, faster and better built Commercial Space Station (CSS) ! This will be the first step on bringng down the cost for the return to the moon to stay ! And the tech developed for the return to the moon to stay will take US and the world to Mars and beyond-Ad Astra... Timothy Lipinski

TimothyLipinski
Автор

I absolutely love the idea and possiblity of a new space station and I'm so excited to see them come true. However, I also absolutely HATE the inflatable Space station. Now that one they are literally asking for it to pop and blow up the space station.

Also this was a great video, please keep up the great work!

jasonguy
Автор

Then how do they avoid debris if they need to spin faster to make artificial gravity, and how they dock it?

minecrafterror
Автор

Nothing says advancement like doing the same thing all over again. COME ON PEOPLE!!!! Continuing to build stations that are "small", and not capapble of having multiple rotating rings for simulating the Earth, Moon, and Mars gravities - at a minimum, is very short sighted. Sure, go ahead a build one more small station to have it going during the shut down of the ISS. But stop thinking so small.

When I was a kid, we were always being told how we were going to put humans into space, and have orbiting stations (with rotation rings), and have stations on the moon, Mars and possibly floating "stations" in high orbit in the Venus atmosphere, by the time I was 60 years old. And maybe even being mining the asteroid field by the time I was 80!!

Well, I will be sixty in two years, and that's when they plan to finally get back on the MOON!!! Ugh! You people are killing me!!!

jeffreyknutson
Автор

wonder if there is a material that is semi flexable that could absorb and keep debris and use that to add to the debris shield

ulfsark
Автор

At 2:20 could someone explain how Starship will dock and undock from a rotating wheel. Plus, how is it planned to maintain balance of this giant rotating wheel so that it won’t shake itself to pieces.

MikeCasey
Автор

We need to just “stop” and rethink this whole space station and shoot a bit higher… like a moon base…

robhawthorne
Автор

How is blue origin going to get their station off the ground? Hire a rocket that can take more than 4 people into orbit?

tombeam
Автор

side not wonder if airbus will make a co. called Space Buss LMAO

ulfsark
Автор

How do you know astronauts are all-natural? Because they're living off the earth.

jonmichaelgalindo
Автор

Let's call a spade a spade. It's the Russian components that are going tits up.

loquist
Автор

Build a new spacestation that could be continuosly upgraded and added on to ! and definitly artificial gravity so the crew doesnt have to exercise so much !

scottymoondogjakubin
Автор

That was kind of a snide comment about thre "When Glann" launcher, n'estr çe pas?

NormReitzel