New Study: Moderna VS. Pfizer Vs. Novavax vs. Johnson & Johnson vs. COVID Infection

(This video was recorded on June 2, 2022)

He is Board Certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine and an Associate Professor at the University of California, Riverside School of Medicine.

LINKS / REFERENCES:

SUBSCRIBE TO THE MEDCRAM YOUTUBE CHANNEL:

Get notified of new videos by hitting the bell icon

MEDCRAM WORKS WITH MEDICAL PROGRAMS AND HOSPITALS:

MEDIA CONTACT:

Video Produced by Kyle Allred

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:

DISCLAIMER:

MedCram medical videos are for medical education and exam preparation, and NOT intended to replace recommendations from your doctor.

#COVID19 #Omicron #Coronavirus

[politicalfoolishness]

This is very interesting. COVID has been a weird "pandemic". While it is real in my opinion, it has exposed so many flaws in society and government.

[mauryasmith]

Please allow studies on adverse effects. Too many people reporting serious issues.

[arnaldosanchez]

Many not acknowledged limitations of this study. IgG titers usually peak at around 3-4 months for most infections/vaccines. In this study three of the vaccine's second dose were close to 5 months previous to T5, and they said previously infected subjects had 6 months after infection but not after exposure (which will add 1-2 weeks). They have curves for the vaccines but only a picture for post infection (T5), and this makes it look as if vaccines were superior, although they are not superior in this study because sample size is small. It is reasonable to think that previous infection is superior in preventing disease, hospitalization or death, as you have immune response to other components of the virus apart from Spike, in addition to mucosal IgA. Unfortunately the study that compares this doesn't exist. But sadly, this type of study is used to justify vaccine mandates as they seem to suggest that vaccines are more effective. Vaccines are wonderful technologies, but to justify mandates, proof of reduced transmissibility is the only thing that is needed.

[robertdole]

What is the point of “vaccination” if you can still contract the disease and still transmit the disease (now exposed to vaccination)?

[bethadams]

Terrific summation! Thanks so much for taking the time to put this together for all of us. :)

[pasionpiano]

Loved to see an HONEST STUDIE on peoples never vaccinated that contracted the virus and came out alive and well.
What about their immune system ?
What about if they lost part of their physical qualities ?
As for those interested to who’s writing this:
Born n 1952, male caucasien, retiré, living in a French Canadian city of about 40, 000 H,
Not vaccinated, didn’t care wearing the mask above my nose., non smoking, no alcohol, no medication, don’t remember being vaccinated except the scratch on my shoulder zillion years ago.
Love being active .

[bradleyanderson]

So basically J&J didn’t go as high but it didn’t drop. It would be interesting to see people who had gotten two J&J vaccinations.

[dotjeff]

This doesn’t seem to address the fact that vaccines only mimic a small section of the spike protein whereas get the actual virus makes antibodies to all the different parts of the virus as well as making other immune cells that fight many different features of the virus.

[CaptainSteve]

Dr. Seheult. I hate always being "that guy." But you are better than this. Here are my observations. 1. You say numerous times and emphasize "this data is for 6 months." That's misleading. In every case, it's really 2 months post-injection. The reality is that at 6 months post-vaccination antibody titers tend to be very low and then are only for variants that no longer circulate. 2. This gave the impression that the vaccines provide immunity, but the antibody response to the wild virus spike RBD is pretty meaningless at this point. We know that's where the majority of mutations occurred in the variants. 3. You casually pass the right by without further discussion the disclosure that this was paid for by the NIAID. Dr. Fauci is behind the NIAIH and both he and they get large amounts of funding from the pharmaceutical companies. Effectively this study was paid for by "big pharma" and the world's leading vaccine promoter (Dr. Fauci), and it provided information that is useless other than effectively being a generic sales pitch for vaccination. The fact still remains that the vaccine is leaky and non-sterilizing, the virus's mutation rate exceeds our ability to keep up, and the majority of people have been exposed to the nucleocapsid protein of one of the variants, which should provide a more durable natural immunity.

[colinpyke]

The most important factor in my risk analysis is that natural immunity comes with NO SIDE Effects.

[timshel]

I won't get any of these meds regardless of how great they are. PERIOD !

[chuckvee]

Had the J&J in 3/2021, an antibody test 180 days later, and NO IgG and IgM antibodies detected. Had J&J booster in early 4/2022, required for international travel. Had no indication whatsoever that I was ever infected up to this point. Tested COVID positive for the first time 36 days after the booster. Only had mild symptoms and tested negative 7 days later when tested again.

[AB-wfgt]

I see Routinely since the beginning over a hundred patients a day
I’m a family doc trained in hospital and emergency medicine and work now urgent care -
NATURAL IMMUNITY IS BEST

[lpgoog]

Something new is needed. Even Fully vaccinated & mild Covid you can still experience vascular/neurological damage & possibly long Covid. Reinfections will be bad for immune system.

[epincion]

Excellent study, what would be very useful is comparative data on efficacy out 6 months of all 4 on the common variants of SARS-COV2.
The m-RNA vaccines are very specifically targeted against the DNA sequence of the first virus whereas Novavax is a old fashioned (but done in quite a high tech way) big chunk of virus and maybe then it’s efficacy is less affected by the appearance of variants.

[DeanbridgeRE]

To any of the long-time listeners who've been on this journey with Dr. Sehault. Remember early on when he shared his personal regimen for taking Vitamin D, Quercetin, etc? Has he shared his personal strategy for taking shots, from which manufacturer, in which sequence, and what his strategy is moving forward? If he did, I missed that video, but I'd like to know because I highly respect his process and ethics. Thanks to anyone who can respond. Have a blessed day.

[RussCR]

It seems to me this study might be useful in situations where vaccination is done in advance of a pandemic, or where a series of variants do not render neutralizing antibodies almost useless through mutations in the Receptor Binding Domain. But that's not the situation we have.

[Jeraggie]

Great video as always.

Is the comparison to natural immunity "fair" considering the study is only looking a the response to the spike protein? I would think natural immunity would potentially be much broader because the immune system will have been exposed to the entire virus. Thanks!

[Lost-In-Blank]

Unfortunate that they were not able to study how well the vaccines worked against variants, and that they were only able to study effectiveness against the pretty much extinct original strain. Good video anyways.

[chrischung]

@20:33 Project funded by NIH.

Also NIH: “We do have some particular stake in the intellectual property" behind Moderna's coronavirus vaccine, NIH Director Francis Collins said during an Economic Club interview in May.