03 Who Darkened Sinaiticus?

preview_player
Показать описание
Vlog 146: Who darkened Codex Sinaiticus to look ancient? A surprising answer. God bless you all! - David W. Daniels

See the color changes in the text I show in the video!
Tobit 2:2 – 3:6

Tobit 1:7 – 2:2
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Another brilliant video! Thank you for doing what the following what the Bible says in Ephesians 5:11 'And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.' The Lord richly bless you (no ... thee), brother David.

biblereadingoutreach
Автор

Thank you for sharing this insight on the Sinaiticus. With your videos, first time I've heard of this implication of deceit. Do hope you will continue to be a watchman on the wall. Sound your trumpet loudly, my friend.

oldtimerlee
Автор

First I have heard of this. Excellent. Another nail in the coffin of the "oldest and best" Greek manuscript. Does Steven Avery have a website? Can you post the link? Thanks.

VegasKJV
Автор

"Ye shall know them by their fruit" !!

m.c.lightening
Автор

Those last few words... the more I love my King James 😊

end-days
Автор

Well said. A lot of stuff here I've never heard of. I didn't even know the name Tischendorf. May our Lord Jesus Christ protect you and bless you.

COMBRICO
Автор

No matter which way you look at it, the differently 'aged' sections of the manuscript is mighty fishy.

DisHammerhand
Автор

God bless thee! And a huge Thanx to Steve Avery for his tireless research!

herbbearingseed
Автор

Trying to make something that you have in hand look old can be for one of a couple of reasons the hope of greater financial gain, where a new looking book would not be considered that valuable, but an ancient-looking book from antiquity would fetch a lot more money.

That is why forgeries exist today because the person doing the forgery is looking for financial gain.

Case in point,

The James Ossuary is a 1st-century limestone box that was used for containing the bones of the dead. An Aramaic inscription meaning "James (Jacob), son of Joseph, brother of Jesus" is cut into one side of the box. The ossuary attracted scholarly attention due to its apparent association with the Christian holy family.[1] However, while the ossuary itself is accepted as authentic to the time period, the inscription itself has been declared by the Israeli Antiquities Authority to be a modern forgery.[2]

The whole reason for this forgery was to deceive the collectors of such antiquities and raise the value of this particular Ossuary

An Ossuary on its own from that time period would have value just for being that old, but if it could be shown to be the Ossuary of a biblical person closely related to Jesus, presto chango the value skyrockets as collectors of such things frequent auctions to bid on antiquities.

Darkening a book to make it look old, is committing forgery it is just that simple.

Mr. Daniels has given evidence that can be verified, as the CFA can be compared to the rest of Sinaiticus by anyone who wishes to see for themselves.

There are those who are fans of the Alexandrinus texts they will cry foul and lie for Jesus, these people can be ignored if they have not done due diligence to fact-check the things said by Mr. Daniels.

There is another point here, that there is an agenda, billions of dollars have been spent making the modern bibles from the Alexandrinus texts, if Sinaiticus was found to have been fraudulently aged, then all of modern academia and those billions of dollars worth of bibles would be called into question, not to mention that the scholars themselves would be called into questions for either not know Sinaiticus was fraudulently aged, or for knowing it was and saying nothing.

Secondarily the agenda is a one-world church with a one-world religion of the last days, Sinaiticus is a big part of that agenda as it is one of the documents being used to move all of Christendom together with mother church and the one world church, and in order to get to that outcome, they need text that will guide Christendom in that direction.

The Alexandrinus text is being revised constantly, one source said this was to move the text closer and closer to promoting Catholic dogma.

But is also to bring about the one-world church/religion for which you need a world bible acceptable to all but the trues Christians.

dennishagans
Автор

Another gold mine presentation. Great job. I am truly convinced that you minored in Criminal Justice with Forensic and Investigative Science as a concentration. [laughs]

jackspalden
Автор

David let me ask you a question, I'm learning all this but I've known a lot of the codex Sinaticus, and I just bought your book actually three of your books waiting on two of them to come in the mail now, however what is the Alexandria Bible? This one I'm not familiar with? And right now I'm learning a lot about codex Sinaticus but I want some literature on codex vaticanus and what people thought about it, I know there's nothing about it mentioned before the 14th century but I don't know much at all about it.

cycribbs
Автор

Thank you so much. God is giving us more info to keep us on the True Word. The King James is the only Bible I will read. God bless you folks.

heavenlyguitar
Автор

Is there an update to the research. Ive watched Chris Pinto Lampinthe Dark series and am byzantine text only. What concerns me is AI change bibles that are online and installed on computers. Is there recent research on AI and the OT variant manuscript. Most folks dont land on one version they say read them all. Appreciate the research. If it wasnt for the lamp in the dark series i would have never heard about Simonides debate.

gregorys
Автор

see the color strip on the side?
It can be used to calibrate the images, I wonder if the differences in color vanish.

alanx
Автор

i love your videos.... very interesting facts... but have you seen how some scholars explain the different colors of Cod. Sin., that they are due to some different storing condition and various exposure to light... ?? i would like to hear your response to that....

helgeevensen
Автор

And what is supposed to be the significance of the difference in the coloration of the parchment anyway??

JamesSnappJr
Автор

+Chicktracts Hey David, can you do a video on the mythical Septuagint? Sam Gipp has a great video and some material he wrote along with Peter Ruckman about that fraudulent document. Thanks.

thomaslowe
Автор

Pretty suspect if the manuscripts are different colors...

TruthSeeker
Автор

Isn't it possible that Tiechendorf found the codex already stained? Then, he just removed the section of white pages for Frederico?

COMBRICO
Автор

The Bible doesn’t talk about the logos. Jordan Peterson with his right hand ring does . Like the masons.

JoseValencia-frwh