How For-Profit Companies Can (And Should) Catalyze Social Change | Nathan Atkinson | TEDxWakeForestU

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Nor your philantropia nor your capitalism works. Keep your gifts & help. Give the land & everything what been stolen back to people & start teaching in schools what matters. Survival & ecology.

resurrectionx
Автор

*Compassion is an attribute of strength. Greed is an attribute of weakness.*

Witch attribute do you own? Witch attribute do you support? Do you still own a heart and a pair of (proverbial) balls? Because if one is missing, so is the other.

aylbdrmadison
Автор

Pay employees a living wage so they can afford to feed their kids. There. Much shorter than what he said

GaasubaMeskhenet
Автор

TEDx Talks are always inspirational. I love your channel!!! Keep up the amazing work.

adventures
Автор

TEDx is doing extrmly awesome work for community. When ever video upload I become excited to watch the

isg
Автор

I can help so much!...you are amazing sir!...you are completely correct!

rondovaz
Автор

One of the most inspirational channel, keep it better..loved it

waroenkgenz
Автор

Wow! It's seems I'm the one first person who is watching your video. Thanks for the video love it💖💖💖

SubenOvung
Автор

*💪BREAK THE CHAlN💪*
Stay home..stay Safe
We will survive..
..Like from kerala, INDIA..


8k56

ijasikku
Автор

TL;DR companies should catalyze social change through their CSR program.

Fantastic.

DennisMansell
Автор

If you can't afford children. DON'T HAVE THEM!

JasonSmith
Автор

How about not breeding bellyfruit you can't feed?
No, personal responsibility can't factor into it.

joeyvanostrand
Автор

We can create a tax for a tax with incentives backed by maybe crypto-currency🤔

rondovaz
Автор

Tik tok came to my mind when I saw the title

hero
Автор

forced charity is socialism and not capitalism... charity is above all... government taking ones choice away goes against God's plan... And mixed messages when it comes to save the children... what about the ones that were "hungry" for "life"?!

edwinparson
Автор

1% from revenue is sometimes too much but could be taken into account while making the pricing. Maybe 5% of the EBITDA could be more appealing. The hard choice is whom to give the donations, I frankly steer clear of Red Cross and alike giants that spend the majority of the revenue.
I'll give a thought about social change we can create aside of providing to our workers and our own families. Agreed that non-profits can't be the only way to promote social change, maybe a rating of the for profits so there is a reason to do good.

giurgindemilan
Автор

He wants to have his cake and eat it too

OGLA
Автор

Capitalism has fed more people worldwide than anything else... UNDENIABLE FACT. By teaching people to fish, you provide a future. By giving people food, you give them food, not a future.

billusmc
Автор

Let start with blacks not calling eachother the N word?

Exodus.Pi
Автор

this is just pathetic business shouldn't be doing anything but, looking out for the people they employ and making a profit

joshuareynolds