CPT Webinar Series #2 | CPT vs SPT | By Eijkelkamp North America

preview_player
Показать описание
The second installment of the webinar series CPT will focus on a direct comparison between the soil investigation method that is most widely used in North America, the Standard Penetration Test, and the Cone Penetration Test, which is a very underutilized method in that part of the world. Both methods will be viewed from different angles, (such as the quantity and type of information that is obtained with either test and the repeatability of that information) to give the attendees a better understanding and appreciation of the Cone Penetration Test.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanks for the video. That was really helpful. I usually go with using them both but moreover depends on the purpose of the investigation. If the investigation is like a pre-work and to characterise the area, spt seems enough. In the second stage, like investigation on the alligment of the structures (tunnel, brigde foots, dam etc) cpt is totaly necessary.

sgara
Автор

Thanks for the video, is CPT suitable for texas soil?

aelseweify