What is the Dialectic of Form and Content? | One Minute Marx

​Noah Khrachvik is a proud working class member of the Communist Party USA. He is 40 years old, married to the most understanding and patient woman on planet Earth (who puts up with all his deep-theory rants when he wakes up at two in the morning and can't get back to sleep) and has a twelve-year-old son who is far too smart for his own good. When he isn't busy writing, organizing the working class, or fixing rich people's houses all day, he enjoys doing absolutely nothing on the couch, surrounded by his family and books by Gus Hall.

If you enjoyed our video please consider checking our website out :

Also, if you are interested in helping us fund our project become a Patron :

Check out our online library for FREE books on Socialism, Philosophy, History, and more:

Listen to our Podcast on Spotify:

Follow us on Instagram: @midwesternmarx
Follow us on Twitter: @MarxMidwest
Like us on Facebook: @Midwestern Marx

[mauricio]

Love these videos Noah, keep em coming bro!

[erikthebread]

there was no ironic Starbucks coffee in the background 9/10

[lizapayne]

Fantastic, im trying hard to understand and these really help thank you!

[green_eggs_and_]

In the example you gave, Socialism is the essence shared between the transformations that China and the Soviet Union underwent?

Edit: what practical implication does this have for critiquing/analysing historical events? Is a critique of form OR content missing the other or is form the only thing possibly to interfere with through analysis? Is the content of something only made clear by its form, or are forms fickle? Does it boil down to "seeing the forest for the trees"?