James Webb telescope Just Saw Something Worrying 'It's Not From Our Universe' Nobel Winner Was Right

For decades, we’ve been taught that the universe began with the Big Bang—a moment when everything we know came into existence. But what if that’s not the whole story? Nobel Prize-winning scientist Dr. Roger Penrose and many others believe the Big Bang wasn’t the beginning, but just one chapter in a much larger cosmic narrative. Recent research even suggests the possibility of a “mirror universe” that might exist beyond the Big Bang. Scientists believe an anti-universe running backwards in time could explain dark matter and cosmic inflation. So far we do not have enough evidence to support this theory. Dr. Roger Penrose believes that some remnants of the black holes of the previous universe can still be seen in the microwave background of the universe. This shows that there was a universe before our universe.

Well, For centuries this idea was purely philosophical, But now groundbreaking discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope are giving it solid scientific backing and bringing it into the spotlight. Recently, the Webb Telescope made a shocking discovery that challenges the Big Bang Theory. Some experts now believe that the images from the James Webb Telescope show signs of a universe that is completely different from what we thought. So, what exactly did the telescope discover?

#jwst #webbtelescope #webbtelescopeupdates #bigbangtheory #bigbang #astronomy #galaxies #earlyuniverse #nasa #crisisincosmology #Hubbleconstant #expandinguniverse

[thechapulinred]

I’ll never understand why we’ve been operating on the theory that creation started with us or that space has ends at some point. That doesn’t make sense.

[scottmghill]

The phrase "not from our universe" is a self-contradiction. Why can't physicists ( and other scientists ) simply admit they have no idea what the universe is like?

[AnTiThesis-HaT-HoT]

Excellent content, no silly ai infill graphics, no hyperbole, not one zee, sensible human narrative and a pause for thought at the end!

[Mr.Buster]

Not only is the universe stranger than we conceive it is stranger than we can perceive.

[guidedmeditation]

The physical universe doesn't start and stop, it cycles and repeats itself.

[stephenchristian-ks]

It seems to me that the idea of space having a start and finish point is completely insane.
We will never ever know how big the universe/space simply because it is infinite.
We as supposed rational thinking beings need to compartmentalise everything so that in our minds rational and understood. Space, is space and it is unrelentingly forever, no beginning, no end!
It's absolutely amazing and beautiful, just accept it for what it is and enjoy it instead of wasting time endlessly analysing it.

[glen]

I'm just a regular working stiff guy, and my theory is that space is infinite, with no beginning and no end, it just is. That's my theory and I'm sticking to it, until I'm proved wrong.

[D.Howerton]

We can't explain what we can see and can't understand what is beyond that. That's scary.

[jamesbradford]

We are so insignificant yet we think we are the centre of everything.

[normg]

"...suggests that the universe is much more mysterious and complex than we presently comprehend..."
Now, there's a thought...

[LetsssGooooooooo]

The only thing more vast than the universe is the depth of human arrogance.

[knezlazar]

Nobody knows what happened and how long ago that will be a mystery forever

[keepmoving]

If black holes are created when a dense star implodes on itself, couldn't the incredible amount of mass in the big bang therefore create the same conditions?

Furthermore, just by probability alone, the fact that so much mass exploded all at once, makes it so that black holes MUST have been created.

[DennisLang-ygok]

How the Hell do you know what's from our Universe and what isn't?

[TheKitchenTechnician]

Maybe the Big Bang is what happens after a black hole becomes so large that it engulfs entire galaxies up to a point where it pulls all the matter in the entire universe into itself and then boom…new big bang. Over and over.

[TechnoMageB]

2:02 If the "observable universe" is 93 billion light years across, then the furthest reaches from Earth is half that (radius vs diameter), or 46.5 billion light years away.
But how is that possible in a universe that is allegedly less than 14 billion years old? How can we "see" something 46.5 billion light years away when the universe literally isn't old enough for light from there to reach us yet, thus making it impossible to observe?
Either that's a typo, or the universe is at least 46.5 billion years old, not 13.8 billion as commonly referenced. Astronomers and Physicists need to update or explain this inconsistency.

[Akdram]

About 4 billion years ago the universe started to expand at a faster rate, this is thought to be because it began to feed from another universe nearby. It could also be reasonable to assume that one day our universe may become absorbed by a much, much larger one.

[RHODOAN]

Everything is one thing and that's why it's called the universe. Nothing can't exist. There are as many dimensions as there need to be.

[JD-nyvz]

Whoaaa I was just reading the Bhagavad Gita and it mentioned that the Universe is billions of years old and goes through and infinite cycle of birth and death.

Fascinating

[MrD_]

ChatGPT is calling Penrose's CCC theories interesting but speculative since light from beyond our observable universe cannot reach us.