Which Version of the KJV Is Correct? 1611 or 1769?

Taken from the KJV Debate of 2021. Nathan Cravatt highlights areas where there were major corrections, not just spelling and punctuation errors, from the 1611 to the 1769 versions of the KJV Bible.

Want to see the full debate this video was made from? Check out my version of the debate, enhanced with subtitles & time clocks, to help aid anyone to find stuff quicker, as well as improve the audio quality during the Q & A session. It’s broken down into the following 5 separate videos…

This is a debate where Nathan Cravatt (a host of the Recovering Fundamentalist Podcast) was invited to debate the King James Only Position with Mitch Canupp (a host of the 1611 Defense Podcast), with pastor Cody Zorn as the moderator (pastor of Bible Missionary Bpt Ch).

[chumleysteven]

This is a rather stupid point considering the many differences in the modern Bibles from each other. If you want to know which Bible is perfect then see YouTube videos by Truth is Christ. He proves that the 1769 KJV are the very Words of God through numerics. It is impossible to refute. This is much like Chuck Missler’s numeric proof that the last 12 verses of Mark are written by God. These verses are are not in the manuscripts text used by writers of all modern Bibles.

[Barb_Niquette]

John Doerr (“A Lamp in the Dark” and “John Doerr”) and Reginald Block (“RescuingTheChurch”) are the only men of God (that I am aware of) who preach/teach that the first printing of the 1611 Authorized King James Bible in 1611 is the inerrant Word of God translated in English. The LORD led me to these two men four years ago after coming out of Catholicism.🙏🏼

[colonyofcellsiamamachine]

RescuingTheChurch channel has written a book Authorized The Real 1611 King James Bible by Reginald Jacob Block with John Doerr, published by thebookpatch. If write the author via email, can get the ebook for free. Some kjvo seem to claim there are no minor translation fixes to the 1611 kjv over more than 400 years, altho they usually admit typo errors have been slowly fixed over the years. There are kjvo believers like Reginald Jacob Block and John Doerr who only use 1611 kjv rather than 1769 kjv bec they believe printers ignorant in hebrew and greek have done minor translation fixes on the 1611 kjv over the years. Kjvo who claim 1611 kjv never got minor translation fixes are maybe out of touch with reality. 1611 kjv believers seem to prefer to call 1611 kjv as AKJB authorized kjb or av1611 bec the many later revisions to the kjv were not authorized.

[ahammer]

But yeah, the NIV has 50, 000 less words the new King James over 10, 000 less words.
As the Lord said, you strain out of knot, and swallow a camel