No Perfect KJV? 1611, 1769, Cambridge or Oxford?

This is the fourth video of Part 1 from "Defending the KJV" series.
See More Below……

RESOURCES: Hi, I'm Dr Gene Kim (UC Berkeley & PBI) and I pastor a church at San Jose Bible Baptist Church. My channel publishes videos that focus on wrong doctrines, dispensationalism, end times and KJV as the only word of God. If that sounds like it could be helpful for you, please subscribe!

Follow us on social media

Pastor Gene Kim
San Jose Bible Baptist Church, CA
#BaptistChurch #Dispensationalism #KJVOnly #Endtimes #Christianity #BibleStudy

[faheem]

Thank you for the teaching, May the Lord bless you.

[baldmansopinion]

Hi pastor Kim, loving this video series, I think its great. I have a question though about a verse, (Psa 24:4) "He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully." Isn't this verse talking about Jesus Christ? because verse 3 asks the question, "Who shall ascend into the hill of the LORD?" My understanding of the word ascend means to go up under ones own power. Isn't Jesus Christ the only one to do that?

[calebalbers]

All somebody needs to do is ask the question what magnifies our Lord Jesus Christ the most and if they are honest they will end up at this Bible which is the Bible and will know that it is the pure word of God.

[owlhoolie]

Pastor, I believe the KJV of 1611 is the only perfect word of God today.Now my question is, the Geneva Bible of 1560 was same pure like the KJV??Because, I see the Geneva Bible was the predecessor of KJV, and it is the first Bible to be divided in chapters and verses, and it is widely used by Baptists before when King James Bible was first printed in 1611.Thank you for the

[robnedloh]

I hope your teaching does not end there! I feel you were really going somewhere

[AVMIKE]

Great video, I read the KJV and the Tyndale NT (Matthews) and I believe both even though there are slight differences. The reasoning in this video is spot on biblical thinking.