Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet Really Better Than ChatGPT?

In this video, we compare the newly launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet with ChatGPT to see which model outperforms the other. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is claimed to offer improved performance, speed, and cost-effectiveness, making it a strong competitor in the AI landscape.

Become an Early Adopter ☕

Business Newsletter [FREE] 📰

-------------------------------------------------
➤ Follow @webcafeai

-------------------------------------------------

Key Takeaways:

✩ Enhanced Performance: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is claimed to excel in graduate-level reasoning, undergraduate-level knowledge, and coding proficiency, surpassing its predecessor, Claude 3 Opus.
✩ Cost-Effective and Fast: Operating at twice the speed of Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is claimed to be suitable for complex tasks, with pricing set at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens.

▼ Extra Links of Interest:

🌲 Do You Create Content?

⚡ AI Services

automate everything. 👇

0:25 - Comparing ChatGPT and Claude Sonnet
1:39 - Structuring output: Claude vs. ChatGPT
3:55 - Testing Claude Sonnet and ChatGPT for direction-following
5:00 - Word count comparison between Claude Sonnet and ChatGPT
8:00 - Comparing user interface capabilities
10:06 - Contrasting coding outputs

My name is Corbin, an AI developer entrepreneur behind the vision of Webcafe AI. Together we will build digital ecosystems. ☕

[Corbin_Brown]

Navigate to key moments👇
made via bumpups.com

0:25 - Comparing ChatGPT and Claude Sonnet
1:39 - Structuring output: Claude vs. ChatGPT
3:55 - Testing Claude Sonnet and ChatGPT for direction-following
5:00 - Word count comparison between Claude Sonnet and ChatGPT
8:00 - Comparing user interface capabilities
10:06 - Contrasting coding outputs

Recap by Bumpups ✏️

[wcjf]

I am a Claude-3.5 convert. It performs incredibly well for my needs, is fast, has great contextual understanding, is very substantive, and even offers suggestions proactively. Love it.

[CosmicCells]

Nice video!
Tip: Turn on the artifacts feature in Claude 3.5 sonnett, in there you can really adjust, enhance and run your code, you can also create tables, graphs etc.
There is also the projects feature now where you can collaboratively work with a knowledgebase

[codecode]

Claude has so much more than you think. Definitely keep using it daily, you will notice some of the gems.

[하하호호-hu]

Claude 3.5 isn't just marginally better than GPT-4o; there's a significant hidden gap between them. You might think GPT-4o's output looks better in some aspects. But this doesn't mean it's actually better or smarter. GPT-4o's streamlined results come from preset, user-friendly outputs rather than independent, thoughtful processing. Except for a few minor aspects where GPT-4o seems better, Claude 3.5 is clearly smarter overall. It appears to have surpassed a threshold that no other existing LLM has reached.

[googleisgarbage]

GPT4o has trouble understanding my prompts in a frustrating way but GPT4 and Claude 3.5 don’t have at all.

[MrArdytube]

i had a grid of information furnished as a traffic study. I wanted a summary and analysis. Claude did a great job… exactly what i needed… GPT output was useless. . I also had some meeting notes. Again, claude prepared an excellent summary. Mostly i use ai for philosophical chats. Again i find claude much better

[Furnabulax]

U sound fine in the video, Corbin! Looking forward to the Apple Intelligence and ChatGPT Mac integration when i get the Macbook im saving for.

[ChristiaanRoest]

Yes, its better than GPT 4 and 4o. Way better for analysing documents and writing. Miles ahead.

[ebandaezembe]

Thanks for this video, Claude 3.5 sonnet is truly amazing

[jasim-dev]

claude 3.5 can code and run the code, build ui and display it

[chowmonkey]

I like both but 4o does an amazing job helping me out create frameworks for a powerpoint presentation. It does write good business letters. It is accurate in matching applicants to jobs. But there is a big but. It is terribly buggy. Systems are overloaded. Claude was my favorite when I started using it as a virtual assistant and 4o looked like the best solution. But I’m considering to convert. Feedback on which of the the two fits the best industries. That would be a great video.

[MichaelBoyens]

Thanks for another excellent video.I am a pro subscriber for Claude and a Teams users for ChatGPT. I've been testing both across a range of use cases this past week. I've found Claude is a better writer and coder, yet ChatGPT is a better analyst and surprising much more accurate in extracting information from "knowledge files". Initially I found Claude better as it supposedly has a 200k context window vs 32k? for ChatGPT. When I fed a precisely formatted 75k token document into a Claude Project (consuming 49% of the available knowledge capacity?) with the exact same prompt as GPT, I found Claude became less and less accurate as the conversation continued. With a custom GPT I found the responses super-accurate. The other big issue for me is that I'd reached Claude's usage limit within a dozen of so prompts so had to wait hours to continue the conversation. Got no-where near the limit with GPT. Given that 3.5 Sonnet is meant to be much cheaper via API than Opus, looks like the pro limit has not increased.

[SciFitoScience]

Bro you cant look at sonnet 3.5 without using the artifact, especially for coding!

[Sandy_Isadora]

Can someone tell me if you know how he edited the video? What tools do you use please?

[gabrielsandstedt]

Claude 3.5 is much better for coding. My use case.

[deserwoski]

I have tried, GPT is so much better, Claude overhyped!