Non-Identity Theodicy #Shorts

[wesleybasener]

Remember kids, God made you special and He loves you very much; so much that it becomes a theodicy.

[grosty]

Now please do a short on the hyper meta ontological argument 😂😂😂

[john-paulgies]

That's like saying that building the Argo an alternate way, by putting the left hand side together first rather than the right, is to make a substantially different ship.
No evil is ever necessary for the Will of God to be accomplished. My parents met due to mutual involvement with pro-life rescues, but this does not mean that I could only exist if millions of children were legally murdered.

[austinapologetics]

Are you going to do a video on the modal comfortian argument?

[icytube]

What’s your favorite argument for God’s existence?

[nobodynobody]

There only is no conceivable way around this if we accept the premise that logical contradictions are what stops God but there is no need to accept this apart from liking analytical philosophy which is devoid of wisdom

[Nickesponja]

Is "being the creator of the universe" an essential property of God? If so, he doesn't have free will to not create the universe and therefore the universe exists in every possible world

[lizzard]

Interesting that Jesus has a different origin to the Father. That makes them essentially different according to this right?

[CH-ekbm]

Yes, but why did God need to create me? Wouldn't he have preferred to create someone else if the path to their creation hadn't involved evil?

[owenmeany]

Wouldn't that mean God can't do anything tho

[bananabreadman]

This type of reasoning is very egocentric, why should it be important to god that you specifically were born rather than not born?

[ShouVertica]

>Evil exist in reality
>You exist in reality
>Therefore you couldn't have existed without evil existing because you wouldn't be you.
Isn't this just saying god couldn't create a world without evil?
Isn't this just saying god can't interact within the world at all?
Isn't this indistinguishable from god being non-existent in the first place in terms of an explanation or justification for evil existing?

It's really odd to me how god loved to interact in the old testament, in minor or grand affairs.
Changing the course of personal lives over and over. Causing and preventing suffering.
Changing the course of history over and over and over.

Yet somehow god's ability to do so is limited now?
When so much suffering from humans and animals exist but yet god does nothing?

The problem of evil for this channel seems to be addressed by poor mathematical understandings of infinite and suffering.
That suffering is ok if you have so much good after.
But does the suffering need to exist or is that "need" requirement only exist because otherwise god would be incompetent or cruel?
What about hell? Most christians believe in a literal hell and have for thousands of years.
Are we now changing our definition of hell to match some cognitive dissonance problem we have? that god couldn't be so cruel as to do that?

Things to think about.