Part 6: Symbolic Logic (Indirect Truth Tables)

preview_player
Показать описание
Indirect Truth Tables
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm not sure if you're still active or view these comments, but I wanted to say thank you. This video helped tremendously!

wamuguy
Автор

where is the rest of the last indirect truth table? I get confused with supposing.

rosalinacervantes
Автор

It was really helpful...one can be really confused while understanding logic but he explained in a great manner!!

sakshi
Автор

In last question, I got contradiction in both cases which means both are valid.like if you got same and dislike if you don't

rakeshrocks
Автор

This is the reductio ad absurdum method, right?

petrumihalcea
Автор

I was able to figure out that the first line of the very last problem was invalid and the second line was undetermined. Does this mean that the argument was invalid? It would be great to get a response to this. Thank you.

MakaOKeAkua
Автор

7 years too late to this tutorial but, did he eventually upload the rest of the video?

metube
Автор

Where is the rest of the truth table solution? It stopped too early (also like video 3) :( Can you please do a reupload or add the missing answers? It would be very much appreciated by all viewers!

kawaii_hawaii
Автор

It can be valid but not sound. Logically inferring takes practice.

skellingtonmeteoryballoon
Автор

Can anyone please write the last part in the comment section I am not able to understand what's after (~ S v ~T)

mathematics