How This Rare Natural Fission Reactor Could Solve Our Nuclear Waste Problem

preview_player
Показать описание
Controlling fission reactions in modern nuclear plants is a complicated and dangerous process, yet nature managed to do the same thing all by itself two million years ago. Here’s how.

Read More:
Ancient Nuclear Waste Is Teaching Us About Radioactive Storage Today
“To get data on what happens to spent nuclear fuel over long periods of time, researchers are turning to a unique place on Earth — the oldest, and only, known natural nuclear reactor.”

Meet Oklo, the Earth’s Two-billion-year-old only Known Natural Nuclear Reactor
“For such a phenomenon to have happened naturally, these uranium deposits in western Equatorial Africa must have had to contain a critical mass of U-235 to start the reaction. Back in those days, they did. A second contributing factor was that, for a nuclear chain reaction to happen and be maintained, there needed to be a moderator. In this case: water.”

The world's first and only natural nuclear reactor
“In a singular but well-documented circumstance, scientists have found evidence that naturally occurring fission reactors were created inside three uranium ore deposits in the west African country of Gabon.”

____________________

Elements is more than just a science show. It’s your science-loving best friend, tasked with keeping you updated and interested on all the compelling, innovative and groundbreaking science happening all around us. Join our passionate hosts as they help break down and present fascinating science, from quarks to quantum theory and beyond.

Seeker explains every aspect of our world through a lens of science, inspiring a new generation of curious minds who want to know how today’s discoveries in science, math, engineering and technology are impacting our lives, and shaping our future. Our stories parse meaning from the noise in a world of rapidly changing information.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Moderators don't prevent meltdowns, they increase the neutron cross section, the likelihood that a neutron will interact with a target nucleus, and allow for more reactions to occur. The control rods are the main tool used to adjust the neutron flux to be self sustaining, known as critical, and not super-critical aka meltdown.

naners
Автор

Downvoted for wrong information. Moderator slows down neutrons to make fission EASIER, not to "prevent explosion". This allows the reactor to run on less-enriched fuel.

Silanael
Автор

Well to be perfectly honest, in my humblest opinion, of course without offending anyone who would otherwise think differently from my own point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning or condescending to those opposed to one's view's, as well as considering each and everyone's unique and valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was about to say.

cowswayne
Автор

Thorium reactors will burn our nuclear waste as a starting cycle. The waste can also be continually fed into a thorium reactor to completely use up the fuel.
A traditional reactor only uses 10-15% of the solid fuel before the rods are damaged beyond safe use do to Xeon gases produced durning the reaction.
We need to be pushing for thorium in the USA. China is well on its way to building a full size reactor.

northernsmith
Автор

Saw this coming millions of years ago with my 20/20 _fission_ .... 👀




Phwoar, that was a good'n!

TommoCarroll
Автор

I was so happy to see this finally covered by a source that a lot of people see and then horrified at the incorrect information given. There is a BIG difference between a nuclear explosion from a bomb and a nuclear reactor melt down...

RIPPEDDRAGONk
Автор

In Molten Salt Ractor's the radioactive wastes bind to the salt coolent/fuel in a similar way as presented in this video. This would indicate that this type of reactor would be quite safe

stanleytolle
Автор

There is a lot more to learn from our Mother Nature

buny
Автор

2:00 error. The neutron absorption cross section is proportional to 1/v. The moderator is used to slow neutrons to increase the probability of absorption.

pikesplitman
Автор

I like the presentation on this. Very low energy and relaxed. A lot easier to binge

abaeza
Автор

Around 4% / Not silver - Boron mainly in addition to Hafnium or Gadolinium

hristiyankolev
Автор

OR, we could use Thorium reactors which are safer, more efficient and will be cheaper once we sufficiently commit to them. But you know, sunken costs and special interests...

garDre
Автор

The thought of a natural reactor is so fascinating! That would be cool to see active in real life.

aurorajones
Автор

To control the rate of a nuclear reaction, you use control rods made of materials that absorbs neutrons e.g. cadmium to slow the rate of the reactions. A moderator increases the probability that an atom of U235 will absorb a neutron so that it has the chance of undergoing fission.

MrCordycep
Автор

2 billion years ago, when I was born, I documented what I saw and put it into a time casual so future scientists knew what it was like. That's why they can now talk with such confidence about the past.

mworld
Автор

1:50 We slow down neutrons not because fast neutrons cause uncontrollable reaction but because if we dont slow them down there would be no chain reaction. Yes fast reactors is a thing but they talked about thermal reactors in this video.

pycysyu
Автор

Nope. The problem is that we use water as the coolant.
We need to keep that under enormous pressure to do its job.
Fortunately there is a MUCH BETTER technology - molten salt, which, at last, is getting the recognition it deserves. There are many proposed designs, which usually start with Thorium, and they turn the Thorium into fissile Uranium.
This is the way to go.

thrunsguinneabottle
Автор

Moderators don't slow down neutrons to prevent an uncontrolled chain reaction. The control rods due that by absorbing them. The moderator material slows down the neutrons so as to increase their cross-section and thus increase the likelihood that a neutron will hit a neighbouring atom and cause a fission without just bouncing off. One must keep in mind that 95% of an atom is actually empty space.

Crimsonedge
Автор

There are Nuclear reactors that work with natural uranium. So no need to enrich. Canada has many of those alongside India, China and Argentina.
Also the moderator slows down the neutrons so that the chain reaction occurs. You see U235 will “react” with thermal neutron (aka low energy neutrons) but the neutrons born from fission are fast neutrons (aka high energy neutrons) and U235 will not produce fision with most of them.
What the moderator does is slow down the neutrons, it makes them lose energy.
What controls the reaction in Nuclear power plants is the control rods and also boron.
If you “lose” the moderator there won’t be an explosion, the reaction would stop. The problem is most moderators are also coolants. So the reaction stops but you still need to cool the core because of decay heat

cuestamx
Автор

Gone fission for tuna, the chicken of the sea

gravijta