Gary Stephenson - Superluminal Quantum Communication

preview_player
Показать описание
Is faster-than-light communication possible? Gary Stephenson discusses quantum entanglement, quantum signaling, and emerging research in superluminal quantum communications.

Conventional science calls faster-than-light communication impossible, but in this presentation, Gary will address the "No Communication Theorem", "No Teleportation Theorem", and "No Cloning Theorem" and explore possible methods to circumvent the limits of the speed of light to facilitate the development of superluminal quantum communication technology.

He will discuss the Canary Island Long Range Quantum State Teleportation experiment, Quantum Spin Liquids in Herbertsmithite, and Entangled Photons in Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) Twisted Beams, as well as providing detailed references to supporting experimental papers.

Gary Stephenson, an aerospace systems engineer with wide-ranging industry experience at organizations including NASA, United Technologies, Linquest, Boeing, ITT, and Hughes Aircraft Company.

Gary has had a deep interest in emerging physics and advanced propulsion for decades, and has published numerous scientific articles on various topics, especially the detection, generation and applications of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm an IBM Quantum member and participant observers 2022. I know that Quantum computers realistically and virtually can perform instantaneous computation or hashing that takes 20 years only takes hours and minutes. I've also seen a presentation manipulating atoms using Quantum entanglement, it's like splicing genes but with atoms.

michaelinzo
Автор

If a communications device like that is ever made it should be possible for people in the future to call us shortly after the device is turned on, and if they didn't you'd conclude our civilization had no future. 😱
Perhaps our descendants will give us enlightened political and cultural guidance. It's fun to consider the possibility.

John-Nada
Автор

EPR quantum entanglement signaling is not possible in orthodox quantum mechanics because of unitarity (conservation of information) as argued by Henry Stapp. ER = EPR in this case is that no-signaling EPR entanglement edge dates are connected to bulk ER non-traversable wormholes that pinch off trapping destroying a particle trying to pass through from one mouth (portal) to the other. Antony Valentini has shown that in the Bohm interpretation this corresponds to thermodynamic equilibrium of the classical level structures that directly interact with the physically real quantum active information pilot waves This corresponds to the Born probability rule that probability density in von Neumann strong projection operators is proportional to the squared modulus of the complex pilot wave amplitudes (based on Feynman's path integrals for example). This implies that any local measurement of an entangled state will show only completely random white noise with no coherent signal. One can extract a signal from the nonlocal entanglement pattern but only using additional classical signal information limited to light cone propagation. Myself and later Roderick Sutherland using Bohm and Hiley's original idea have introduced direct back reaction of the classical level structures on their guiding quantum pilot waves. When this happens, unitarity is violated and EPR signaling corresponding to traversable ER wormholes happens. This is the PQM extension of orthodox QM of strong measurements. Yakir Aharonov extended orthodox QM to weak measurements that give new experimental information as explained by arXiv papers of Aephraim Steinberg. Aharonov needs two independent complex conjugate pairs of pilot waves the advanced back from the future destiny waves and the retarded forward in time history waves. This is best visualized in the Feynman path integral Action Principle Lagrangian formulation that depends upon both past and future boundary conditions rather than the Hamiltonian formulation in which one specifies the quantum wave and its rate of change on a single hypersurface (either past or future). Sutherland (2015 arXiv) extended Aharonov's idea to Bohm's interpretation making it fully relativistic ands including action-reaction. In this case, it is possible to decode locally nonrandom signals out of the quantum noise without needing a classical retarded signal key. This new situation corresponds to Antony Valentini's "sub-quantum non-equilibrium" and to Roger Penrose's "Orch OR" although we do not need his gravity collapse mechanism. Sutherland also shows that FTL non locality is a chimera to be replaced by locally retrocausal Costa de Beauregard "zig zags" explained recently by Huw Price (arXiv). This also eliminates the need to use computer intensive many-particle configuration space in modeling quantum information storage in separated particle entangled states.

JackSarfatti
Автор

This sounds like more than just an ansible.. it also seems to be a possible solution for a 'radio' to communicate directly with a time traveling UAP, regardless of both where and *when* it happens to be, from an entangled device located at the original timeline where/when the pair of cores were created, and so in sync. Imagine an internet with zero ping in the present, able to share information with the past or future at any distance in any direction in spacetime.. redundancy systems able to error correct by comparing recent past with present states for changes occurring outside of desired modulation processes.

graphite
Автор

There is still the question of When Do You Look?. If you look too early, you change the quantum state of the (particle/cluster/spin liquid), so it will break entanglement. You would need a separate signal telling you entanglement has been broken, so look then, but not before. Can this separate signaling for time be FTL? Or entangled and reusable? If entangled, won't you just have the same problem all over again?

This is why simply making the qbit larger (spin groups), may not yield helpful information. There's still something missing on a fundamental theoretical level, perhaps.

onebylandtwoifbysearunifby
Автор

Breaking the herbertsmithite would disentangle the individual pieces, but it would be interesting to make long wires of the material to see if the spin liquid could send signals along a wire FTL. "Begging the signaling question" is a great paper. With one photon communication is not possible, but with a continuous stream of entangled pairs sent from one location to both the sender and reciever at some point in the past, the sender could choose whether or not to measure their stream and that would alter the sampling statistics for the receiver instantly. Then just encode one or another sampling statistic to mean zero or one. to open the "wormhole" wider you just need more particles. Plus an agreed upon resonant entangled system set up at some point in the past.

michaelperrone
Автор

quantum entanglement what if you re-use the morse code alphabet... it doesn't matter what spin you get..just the fact to receive a "beep" is enough..you just need a bunch of entangled particles..you play on the time between "spin measure" and create an alphabet...am i missing something else?

kingjackel
Автор

Instantaneous Communication is, by another aspect, Gnostic, or a type of Form filter that exists in DNA/RNA lock and key combinations of Quantum Chemistry bonding proportioning directly from sync-duration Actuality exemplified in Euler's Unit Circle cross-sectional compositions of Superspin Superposition-point Singularity Positioning.
The Universe is a unique format, "only" shifting shapes, as the laws of Thermodynamics demonstrate. NO-NO theroms apply within 2-ness cross-sectional picture-plane containment states, orthogonal-normal to axial-tangential asynchronous numberness not harmonic to 2. Wave-particle node-antinode wave-packaging.

davidwilkie
Автор

I've read in the news China developing somekind of Quantum telecom, 6g signal and net/wifi.

michaelinzo
Автор

60 Hz 4K footage of a miniature UAP reveals that the technology base eschews conventional translation for a processes of repeatedly quantum-tunnelling at a high but variable cycle frequency, thus resolving the apparent acceleration, inertia, momentum and KE anomalies (per Elizondo's '5 observables'): /watch?v=AE6vLJ2cxgs - if they're FTL-capable, this may be one way they're achieving it. Each jump might be arbitrarily short-distance, down to the Planck scale, yet at a high cycle frequency we'd perceive smooth motion, levitation, and general non-Newtonian / non-dissipative translocation. Another means by which they can time travel however is hyperspace / teleportation: both saucers and box-orbs are hyperspace-capable, the box-orbs first pairing up via a tether they extrude out between them - presumably for the purposes of sharing / distributing entangled states - then parting again before recombining a final time in an energetic EMP and disappearing; i've collected multiple sources demonstrating the tethering behaviour, but the following one also shows the hyperspace sequence: /watch?v=vzsszJ5UwMI&t=449s - we have good indications box-orbs are composed of metamaterials - there's a recovered magnesium / bismuth sample that looks like a piece of one, and they exhibit various macroscopic quantum effects (photomultiplying incident light, visibly leaping or showing superpositions / two loci at once etc.) - so with aggregate coherent states consolidating Fermi numbers right down into a min. entropy config, a handful of entangled particles might suffice to teleport a whole macro-scale system. We're evidently missing a trick or three, anyhoos..

MrVibrating
Автор

Er=EPR
Quantum Entanglement, that is all it is!, ..absolutely everything in Self-defining Superposition-point Totality.

davidwilkie
Автор

A property of universal uniqueness is that the common desire to set yourself apart and above others will be effective in separating an individual from the whole, plus and minus. It is the quantization cause-effect of one POV conscious awareness and Conscience, sense-in-common. Hostility is reflected promptly?

davidwilkie
Автор

Schroeder's Cat imaginary situation is the example of potential positioning possibilities compared with the plausible experiment and united mono-dualistically in a projection-drawing, the Actuality is Theoretical and the decision to try the experiment is probabilistic, of well known proportions in rates of Atomic decay, so the holistic significance of the thought is about relative-timing ratio-rates in universal conscious awareness sensory Communication.

davidwilkie
Автор

Fascinating. Kip Thorne describes converging gravitational waves able to create a black hole. Gravitons exhibit exotic, mass like behaviors.

LuciFeric
Автор

it doesn't matter what bob see and ales see as long as ales see bob has looked and gets a beep FTL communication is then possible in morse code system.

kingjackel
Автор

Two quantum entangled objects perhaps a type of crystal can theoretically tranceive not only energy but mass if the mass was converted into a plasma then injected into object A along with the reconstruction data where then it will emerge from object b somewhere in the galaxy then using the reconstruction data the plasma can be reconstituted back to it's original mass.

onetruekeeper
Автор

SETI searched for radio signals from outer space, but maybe they should be looking for some kind of quantium signaling?

garjog
Автор

You're channel goes hard bro, love your content

HouseJawn
Автор

I'm confused about the claim of 2012's Canary Island experimenting proving FTL communication with quantum entanglement. I'm not educated in physics. I just did a quick google search and found tons of people saying that QE does not allow for FTL communication. Can anyone help elaborate?

henndawg
Автор

Perhaps they can entangle several particles to create a signal.

obtrunco