Remi Cornwall - Superluminal Communications & Secure Signaling

preview_player
Показать описание
Remi Cornwall discusses a novel approach to superluminal communications & secure quantum signaling and provides insight into the EPR Paradox and "No-Communication Theorem".

Remi has proposed a way around the EPR Paradox that allows superluminal signaling, citing Bohr, the principle of Complementarity, and the idea that unmeasured quantities don’t actually exist classically.

He also proposes an experiment for instantaneous, superluminal communication involving “the detection of a photon entangled state as one binary digit and either of the collapsed states as the complement digit”. In his device description, "several tens of photons are sent per bit to allow for path differences between the two arms of the interferometer and accurate interference but in principle one photon per bit is possible".

Remi Cornwall, an alumni of UMIST/Manchester and London University with Master’s degrees in electronic, electrical and information/software engineering and physics. He spent the early part of his career in industry at blue-chip companies but devoted his spare time to problems in engineering physics. His research company is currently working upon three projects – thermo-electric conversion with ferrofluids, secure communication by quantum entanglement and novel forms of electromagnetic propulsion.

Links & Resources:

Superluminal Signaling & Secure Quantum Communication (Paper By Remi Cornwall)

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

As always, wonderful for you to upload these! Thanks Tim!

moonman
Автор

Constructively:
Perhaps some procedure to test sound levels for gain, so they are equivalent. Probably a higher gain microphone on the other end would help this also.

onebylandtwoifbysearunifby
Автор

Great interview! Only issue was Remi is really hard to understand, sounds like he’s using his computer’s built in mic.

MrRedshift
Автор

Great discussion, but just to fill out some trivia:

• only local hidden variables have been (or one suspects, _can_ be) falsified

IE. the possibility of non-local hidden variables remains, so pilot waves, higher-dimensional strings or whatevs..

• the irreconcilable concession determinists can't forfeit is *causality*

It has to be sacrosanct, inviolable & immutable, or else we're asked to admit a kind of dualism; the suggestion that the basis of reality may be stochastic is a paradoxical affront to reason itself.

Besides, there's a distinction between something inherently indeterminable, vs intrinsic indeterminability, such as regarding the availability of information; this is one angle Anton Zeilinger (also referenced in the paper) covers with his proposition that conjugate variables are represented by a single qubit, thus once it's been resolved and thus 'consumed', no more information about the covariant term exists.. so ie. if you determine absolute position then there is no more information describing momentum, or vice versa: basic conservation of information - either it ends up in the detector _or_ the interference fringe, but elementary quanta can't be split.. the qubit is essentially non-local, or distributed between two places at least, only localised at collapse.

The possibility of time being two-dimensional is something i've toyed with for years: simultaneity (strictly, precluded by relativity) and sequentiality as fundamental informational domains, and their dependent relationship with consciousness via temporal integration windows such as response freqs / refractory periods etc.); similarly, the question of whether particles in eg. the single-electron DSE (when electrons are sent thru singularly one at time) might be interacting with one another via time, rather than with themselves in space.. but that's a whole 'nother rabbit hole.

It looks like the aliens are using quantum comms tho, even if no one else is admitting to doing so.. not to mention quantum teleportation / self-replication / hyperdrive techs. I appreciate their non-intervention policies and all, but purely by dint of _seeing_ them, we're getting a heads-up on what's actually possible..

Loving these interviews - they don't call it the bleeding edge for nothing, but this channel ain't afraid to go there while still (mostly) keeping the wheat from the chaff..

MrVibrating
Автор

This is the guy that corners you in a pub and you’ve no idea what he’s talking about but it seems rude to just wander off so you sit there nodding politely hoping that he’ll finish talking soon, while keeping an eye on the door in the vain hope that even the most tenuous acquaintance might come in and rescue you.

paullb
Автор

I was able to understand like every other word the audio is so bad.

dueldab
Автор

2nd dimension of time?
I have a strong inkling there are at least 2, but inescapably 3 time dimensions. Perhaps 2 of them are rotations, which sum to the 3rd time dimension which we are familiar with.

The trouble here is there are only 1 slot for time in the GR field equations, so composite time simply has no convenient place to be put. This, i think, is why it is ignored. "But where should we add it, and when 1 works, why bother?" Neither of these are good logical arguments, let alone scientific ones.

Viva the few who push beyond the common, the easy, the complicit.

onebylandtwoifbysearunifby
Автор

Someone already has the patent on this but it’s classified. There is zero chance this guy is going to be able to monetize this

ultravioletiris