Shrek (2001) Technical Goofs Early Animation and Final Animation Comparison

Disclaimer This video is not for kids This is only made for Teens and adults who like Shrek Or people who are into lost media and lost media is not for Children! Also animation is a medium not a genre. A lot of effort goes into these movies, especially for Shrek which took over half a decade to make

Here’s a comparison of Shrek (2001) Technical Goofs with the early animation from 1999 and 2000 and the final animation from 2000 and 2001 in the final version of the movie hope you animation enthusiasts or Shrek fans enjoy this!

Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

#lostmedia #shrek #animation

[zachsmith]

This movie went through so much and it turned out a masterpiece

[vaderexmachina]

these technical goofs are pretty much the only snippets of Mike Myers voicing shrek with a american accent instead of the scottish one he used in the final product

[dimitriskontos]

Fuzzy donkey is actually looking like a rabbit🤣

[adri]

fuzzy donkey is actually so cute 😭 he's very shaped

[Chris_RT]

The last clip really suprised me.
The fact that his hair takes the shape of the crown..

[TitusSc]

"Also animation is a medium not a genre" amen to that

[johnkelly]

It's a shame Walking Skirt was cut from the film. I thought there was a lot of potential for her.

[metaII]

Am I the only one who found these more funny than scary when I was a kid?

[jaycerrito]

How fitting that Fuzzy Donkey became a memorable goof that a Fuzzy Puss in Boots was his successor in the technical goofs of Shrek 2

[richardtennity]

How is this not for kids. I actually remember watching these technical goofs as a kid and I thought they were pretty interesting and funny

[Patowtow]

That fuzzy donkey would actually be incredible in the finished film 😂

[radzzi]

0:23 shrek looks like nemesis from resident evil 3 😂

[Zizumia]

The visual glitches paired with the music was absolute nightmare fuel to me as a kid. The music still kinda haunts me 😅

[blistlelo]

I can relate to these goofs as an amateur animator where you need to be patient and work hard with trial and errors after waiting for hours of baking and rendering a few seconds animation. I works with both traditional and CGI but I prefer 2D due to these difficulties I have with animating CGI as well as I had much more experience with 2D.

[conlangknow]

0:23 when the teacher that doesn’t know how to brush their teeth comes with a 1 metre radius of you

[TylerMcNamer]

I always find them fascinating when I first watched them.

[noname-otvd]

Didn't know this movie was in production as early as 1999.

[cyber-thundr_]

The one change you guys might realized in the Shrek techinical goofs is that Mike Myers never does an accent. After the movie was finished, they want him to read the lines AGAIN this time with a scottish accent on Shrek we know in love.

[tiodepaioriginal]

We need a whole version of Shrek with fuzzy donkey

[sundaylee]

I understand why early 2000s cgi got a lot of pain in the ass render bugs, I remember when I was in college back in 2009, when we use 3d software like Maya, render takes a very long time, and it got a lot of bugs you can only see when it finished, so what people do is to make animations during the day, and render the videos at night for hours and hours, sometime for days just for a clip of 10 seconds, then find out there are render bugs . Nowadays renders can be previewed beforehand, and are more stable and reliable, even free software like Blender can handle it way better than before