Local and Fast AI comes to your developer workflow - Full Line Code Completion

preview_player
Показать описание

JetBrains IDEs introduce a new feature that enables developers to autocomplete entire lines of code using locally-run deep learning models. This functionality directly addresses the fundamental constraints of cloud-based alternatives, and ensures data remains on your machine without any need for external server communication. Thus, everyone can complete the code in trains, airplanes, and even ships without the internet, and extra subscriptions.

Full line code completion is available for Java, Kotlin, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, CSS, PHP, Go, and Ruby, within the corresponding JetBrains IDEs out of the box: IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate, PyCharm Professional, WebStorm, PhpStorm, GoLand, and RubyMine. Expect support for more languages in upcoming releases.

Full line code completion vs. AI Assistant
There are two ways you can benefit from AI functionality in JetBrains IDEs – full line code completion and JetBrains AI Assistant. We appreciate that this might be confusing, so let’s take a closer look at what they have in common and how they differ.

Both full line code completion and JetBrains AI Assistant aim to help you work faster. They both also go beyond the standard completion that has been available in JetBrains IDEs for some time already. However, JetBrains AI Assistant is a separate product in its own right. Its feature set isn’t limited to code completion – it offers you a lot of other things, too, including context-aware smart chat and the ability to generate tests or write documentation.

#JetBrains #fullinecodecompletion #programming #ai
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is why I'm subscribing to Jetbrains and have done it for several years now.
Always new useful tools and top notch support

TheCoinSE
Автор

So this works without Jetbrains AI Assistant subscription?

drakenra
Автор

Wow. 4k video. I was thinking like "what the heck? why is the guy so sharp?" 😁 Nice!

sergeygultyayev
Автор

I've been using this in the EAP version.
working perfectly fine so far

shashix
Автор

Always enjoy this guys videos. Informative yet hilarious :-D

tomdringer
Автор

Great video! Excited to try this out 🎉. Btw, what is the Editor theme / color scheme that you used in the IDE?

anncatherinejose
Автор

I'm getting used to this. To be honest it did my head in to start with but I've started to understand how to use it and I really do like this a lot. I'm doing a user interface at the moment and the autocode is very quick for repetative tasks and is pretty accurate overall

davethinkingsystems
Автор

there is no link for press release in the description at the moment

yevsa
Автор

Dart (/Flutter) would be excellent too!

notarealperson
Автор

hey what about Swift and IOS ? please come up also with Swift Programming also specially for app code. Please Please

asadanik
Автор

Full Line Code Completion did not work for me. Waiting about 1 minutes, no full line code completion cames up.

ericknyoto
Автор

It lags on my laptop, needed to downgrade to webstorm v2023.3.6, it seems I need to buy a newer machine for this local AI tools

dimitridoroshko
Автор

I'm waiting for Rider to get this update!

Serhii_Volchetskyi
Автор

That’s how I can justify my need of a GPU and 32gb ram for coding and IDE.

rishiktiwari
Автор

How does compare to jetbrains ai assistent?

Andi-dphy
Автор

Even better would be to allow us to use our own locally-run model APIs with a chat interface and code completion.

ontheruntonowhere
Автор

I genuinely thought Macaulay Culkin was in the thumbnail 😄

winterboltgames
Автор

Also jetbrains academy is so expensive!

seanknowles
Автор

I deactivated this because i could not easily just type less and not get the completion..

arneninio
Автор

This is the biggest reason I hated CoPilot and liked AI assistant. When full line completions get in the way with bad suggestions and remove the better, more accurate shorter suggestions that already exist, you fall into that pattern of typing a little, waiting a second, fixing bad suggestions instead of writing it correctly to begin with. It's a slow workflow that leads to worse code.

Thorax