'Where Do You Have That Authority?': Issa Grills FBI Head On Bureau's Role In Online Censorship

preview_player
Показать описание
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing last week. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) questioned FBI Directory Wray about the agency's relationship with Big Tech.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

Stay Connected
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I suggest Wray receive 81 million criminal charges for violating the Constitutional Rights of at least 81 million U.S. Citizens.

Crypto
Автор

Whenever he is talking, Wray seems to be smirking. This agency is rotten to the core.

diminudivadollhaus
Автор

The FBI In The United States and The RCMP In Canada are way overstepping their boundaries. Get rid of Biden and Get rid of Trudeau.

MisterTee
Автор

Wasn't the FBI paying some of these social media apps millions of dollars? What were they paying them for?

c.manning
Автор

They assume whatever authority they want.

For decades, no one has stopped them.

AlanRoehrich
Автор

When Wray's lips are moving, he's lying.

kz
Автор

There is no such thing as a "suggestion" when a Government Agency comes calling. Implicit force is always behind any "request" or "notification." Else, they would have no power.

RobinDale
Автор

Waisted time, nobody will ever never get a straight answer….. stop it!

tatatatata
Автор

I am shocked at the arrogance and non-answers as well as just plain lies!

sfogkep
Автор

For the head of a major govt agency, Wray sure does say, "I don't know" a lot. . .

greenshp
Автор

Mr. Issa represents my area in southern California and I am very happy he rebuffed Mr. Wray.😅

kerrywoods
Автор

Order=Threat, backed with plenty of dire consequences.

davef.
Автор

Oh of course for ....corporations. To protect the country or corporations? Explain national security threat. I want the definition. We are not just censored online but daily as we go about our business. So it seems all the people in America are security threats? Lmao! Geezus!

mynameisnobodysometimeseve
Автор

How these people hold office and doesn't seems to know anything.

rebeccadiggs
Автор

'We do do'.. Enough said...

FlipforTruth
Автор

"We basically just imply we will make problems for them if they don't cooperate by simply asking them to cooperate with us in the first place. But being they are ideologically aligned with us anyway for the most part, we don't even really need to do that. They are all to happy to comply with whatever we want."

metalrules
Автор

There is nothing that this sick individual can say that we can believe.

jameyhooper
Автор

Liar ! Right to our face. This agency should be broken up. Totally corrupt.

markoliver
Автор

Christopher Ray got caught in a double talk action while answering Darrell Issa's question and I believe he thinks nobody picked up on it. His day on reckoning is coming as the walls are closing in. I just hope he is not able to resign before it happens and walk away like many others have in the past. He needs to be prosecuted in the same fashion he has done to others. Too many walk away with just a hand slap while they retire with their wealth and their taxpayer benefit packages.

davearnold
Автор

He is reading his confusion to the question

betterd