Logical equivalence with truth tables

preview_player
Показать описание
How to create a truth table for a proposition involving three variables. (Works with: MTH 210, MTH 225.)
  1. GVSUmath
  2. CamtasiaForMac
  3. truth
  4. table
  5. MTH210
  6. MTH225
Рекомендации по теме
Logical equivalence with 0:07:45

Logical equivalence with truth tables

Propositional Logic − 0:17:23

Propositional Logic − Logical Equivalences

Logical Equivalence by 0:09:58

Logical Equivalence by Truth Tables - Logic - Discrete Mathematics

Logical Equivalence of 0:03:42

Logical Equivalence of Two Statements

Truth Table Tutorial 0:07:51

Truth Table Tutorial - Discrete Mathematics Logic

Proving a Tautology 0:06:24

Proving a Tautology by Using Logical Equivalences

Discrete Math - 0:16:12

Discrete Math - 1.3.1 “Proving” Logical Equivalences with Truth Tables

Converse, Inverse, & 0:11:54

Converse, Inverse, & Contrapositive - Conditional & Biconditional Statements, Logic, Geometr...

Logic Gates, Truth 0:54:07

Logic Gates, Truth Tables, Boolean Algebra AND, OR, NOT, NAND & NOR

3 Ways to 0:05:29

3 Ways to Show a Logical Equivalence | Ex: DeMorgan's Laws

8. Prove logical 0:05:27

8. Prove logical equivalence by truth table #DiscreteMathematics #TruthTable #Equivalence

Logical Connectives, Truth 0:12:55

Logical Connectives, Truth Tables, Tautologies and Contradictions, Logical Equivalence

Logical Equivalence with 0:07:24

Logical Equivalence with Truth Tables

Logical Equivalence with 0:16:23

Logical Equivalence with out using truth table examples or equivalent formulas examples

Logical Equivalence Proof 0:13:12

Logical Equivalence Proof

Truth Tables Tutorial 0:11:38

Truth Tables Tutorial (part 1)

Equivalence - Truth 0:21:53

Equivalence - Truth Tables

PROOFS with TRUTH 0:09:02

PROOFS with TRUTH TABLES - DISCRETE MATHEMATICS

Propositional Logic: The 0:53:48

Propositional Logic: The Complete Crash Course

Conditional Statements: if 0:07:09

Conditional Statements: if p then q

Logical equivalence without 0:07:08

Logical equivalence without truth tables (Screencast 2.2.4)

Logical Equivalence with 0:07:04

Logical Equivalence with out using Truth table || Examples || DMS || MFCS

Equivalence of Formulas 0:14:51

Equivalence of Formulas || Logical Equivalence using Truth Tables || Propositional Logic ||DMS |MFCS

Logic Circuit Analysis 0:05:42

Logic Circuit Analysis using Truth Tables

Комментарии
Автор

YouTube has the best teachers. I used to think I just sucked at math but turns out i understand it when it's explained properly. I wonder how much i'd fail without youtube.

rrraynoorrr
Автор

Omfg thank you. This helped a lot since my logic teacher is a dumbass and can't teach...she yells at me for not getting it....wtf

NaseemKhan-qnyj
Автор

I'm basically paying the uni just for the certificate. Most of the learning takes place using youtube videos.

rrraynoorrr
Автор

After 8 long years.... Life has brought me here.

bigkahunaburger
Автор

Nice work, helped me a lot on my Discrete maths test! Thanks!

Nikmuk
Автор

Hello Sir, thank you so much for the video. Why is it that F or F in the begging reaches results in a T and then F or F later on results in an F? This is almost like a contradiction. It's in the P such that q part. 4:03

Brlitzkreig
Автор

these YouTube teachers need to become professors because mine sucks

TOXIC_RESHDI
Автор

thank you so much for making it so clear for me

yixuanlu
Автор

Under the conditional truth table where p—>Q is false on both atomic formulas. Why is it still true and not make it false?
Could anyone give an intuitive explanation on why it’s still true.

HUMANEHAVOC
Автор

watch out guys we've got a badass over here...

lyszkesoli
Автор

Man this guy sounds like fucking OwnagePranks.

SimeonStanchev
Автор

If only he took a few seconds to explain why he assigned an F or T to each column : (

ubr-mtv