Can Cops See Through Walls!? Yep, They Can Without a Search Warrant! #4thAmendment #4thAmendment

We don't know much about the devices police use to "see through walls." All we do know is that they do use them, and we know some of the devices they are known to use.

Many people don't believe this is happening because it inherently violates the Fourth Amendment. But, it certainly does happen, mostly because the police are so secretive about these devices, the courts don't find out about them until someone challenges their findings. Think about it... If the police keep a tool top secret, how will defense attorneys know to fight the Fourth Amendment violation.

#FourthAmendment
#4thAmendment
#KnowYourRights
#ConstitutionalRights
#Constitution
#ProtectYourRights
#PoliceMisconduct
#Police
#Cops

[michaeloppenheimer]

That violates the promises of the fourth amendment of the constitution.

[normallymute]

So they can see people through walls but still choose to use flashbangs in rooms will babies?

[kevinborders]

Violation of the 4th amendment without a warrant. There should be charges against every agent to ever use it

[geremypelleran]

Remember that thin blue line is for them to hide behind not you.

[johnnyjohnson]

This is the standing Army Jefferson warned about! We are living in a police state and have for a long time.

[mannyndamendment]

Why back the blue? All the evidence shows they are not on your side.

[DavidSmith-fzju]

Yes, it violates our right to privacy.

[memberarnshine]

They weren't using it they were abusing it

[damiana]

Makes you wonder how many times a child being caught in the crossfire was "involuntary"

[robevans]

Same as the stingray systems acts like a cellphone tower to spy on cellphones

[bentaft]

You wonder why civilians don’t think it’s so called law enforcement

[markbenacquisto]

This would fall under the same rulings as thermal image

[ptspyder]

They also log everyone's license plates at every major intersection everyday. They can solve basically any crime with it, but dont use it much because they dont want their surveillance to be discovered.

[shawncarroll]

Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001),  by Justice Scalia was supposed to have put this to rest. It's pretty much says the Fourth amendment applies to all technologies, its not what they use to obtain the info, its where their target is. A home is protected - well usually mostly and it depends. But when Antonin Scalia is too liberal for law enforcement, then civil rights violations are afoot...

[pnhedgeezer]

That’s why you can’t use lead based paint anymore. Lead will block the signal.

[PJ-zywo]

The real question is, can we the people sue for this?

[timf]

When they knock on the door and say we know your in there they really do?

[daviddurham]

Do you mind if I post this on Facebook? I think people should know this all over the United States!

[marlow]

If we expect the government or law “enforcement” to not intentionally violate the civil rights of the people, we are FOOLS.

[akhaze]

This is the reason why they banned lead paint. It wasn't cause your kids chew on walls...how dumb.