The Suez Crisis of 1956 - Professor Vernon Bogdanor

preview_player
Показать описание

In 1956, Egypts President Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal Company. In response, Britain, together with France and Israel, attacked Egypt. The Suez War was the only major military engagement in the 20th century which was opposed by the official opposition. It was opposed also by the United States and the United Nations. Britain and France were compelled to withdraw from Egypt. Suez damaged the reputation of the Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden. He had been the last Prime Minister to act as if Britain was still a world power; and the first Prime Minister to have to face the reality that she was not.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

As always, entertaining, erudite, and informative to a fault. The good professor does not disappoint.

WildBillCox
Автор

Coming to these very late, but they're relatively concise for how large a topic they cover.

skeletalbassman
Автор

Great lecture (again). If only this kind of incisive analysis of rivals' varying motives were part of the public discourse of current international crises like Syria & the Ukraine.

Laurencemardon
Автор

At c. 1:13:00 and after, the speaker several times says "Europe" when he means the E.E.C., which is not the same thing at all. The E.E.C. at the time of de Gaulle's veto was only 6 countries, only a small proportion of the whole continent.

simongleaden
Автор

I really enjoy these lectures. I've learned quite a bit.

johnkeller
Автор

An extremely interesting and very informative analysis of Britain's role in the Suez crisis.

jwt
Автор

Brilliant Analysis and very interesting concluding comments.

davidalexander
Автор

Superb lecture, thank you. I look forward to the others in this series.

sophrapsune
Автор

8:18 When the Americans tell the British that they, the Americans, took the view that they, the British, should leave, because otherwise they, the British again, would give the impression that the West is still colonialist, is when the Americans finally mastered the art of British understatement.

ThePinkus
Автор

The British were the good guys here, pure and simple.

ArmyJames
Автор

The best lecturer in the series. - Supermac! - I think the UN is useful as a place where contacts can be made between hostile powers who do not have formal relations. "World opinion" is an overrated concept, "world government" a bad one.

williamneumyer
Автор

He’s unrivalled. We are fortunate for his gifts.

DavidSmith-eedf
Автор

42:10 “Ike will lie doggo” quote for the ages there

DwRockett
Автор

Sir Bogdanor has specialized in being The Ultimate English Upperclass Dignitary

Videokeizah
Автор

A very engaging and informative lecture, as always. But the conclusion that Eden might have been prescient about Suez is absurd. He blundered disastrously and proved to be a man behind his times, not ahead of them.

chelSEY
Автор

1:16:37 True, *those* wars would not have happened. Your earlier point about Nasser-led guerrilla war against the Anglo-French occupiers is what would have happened.

RonJohn
Автор

The first lesson in History studies - it's interpretive.
This professor has presented a view that excludes at least a couple of important facts. That Egypt was essentially going to virtually starve without funding from the West for the Aswan Dam and therefore sought aid from wherever else it could, and the important point that Communism is anathema to a religious society.
Listening to this professor reminded me of the revisionism that has plagued History departments since I studied it in the 90's. The language he uses, the false connections he implies (US and British convergence), the blindness to verifiable historical facts (Nasser found Communism quite antithetical)- this all suggests a historian on the fringe.
I had a high opinion of Professor Bogdanor - and Gresham - but this reminds me of the square peg/round hole forced narrative I've heard elsewhere by historians.

AshErosion
Автор

It was very rich indeed to hear a Brit complaining about being "plundered" by Egypt.

MrDrdown
Автор

Some Americans still wonder why Britain did not support them in Viet Nam.

GL
Автор

Churchill on Dulles; “Dull, Duller, Dulles.”

patrickshannon
join shbcf.ru