Judith Butler's Theory of Gender Performativity (Final)

[LyricalKnight]

Wow! Thank you for sharing this educational video! Kudos to you!

[YyJester]

I like how a personality trait of men is Bread 🍞 😎👌😋 1:35

[prschuster]

Gender expression, identity and roles are conflated here. They are completely different things.

[elizetealmeidadasilva]

Como é que a América deixa uma louca dessa influenciar tantas crianças, ex uma nação que não ama suas crianças.

[NYCBigBull]

Then why to trans men on testerone claim they behave more masculine and trans women on estrogen say they feel more feminine. Answer: it is natural.

[BCtruth]

So, is the goal to eliminate gender? Not sure how that helps society. In fact, it seems like it would cause more harm than good. The vast majority of people 95+% are very comfortable with traditional gender roles. What's the benefit of removing them and having more people confused about who they are? So the 5% can "feel normal"?

[shmeet]

@0:33 "WHAT IS GENDER?" ... "A set of expectations that society..." - Butler is wrong. She's using Dr. John Money's theory of gender that was proven to be fraudulent back in 1997. John/Joan from the 70's experiment came forward in 1997 and let the world know the truth. Money LIED! He LIED, LIED, LIED. For 30 years! Gender Studies/Sociology "professors" for the most part refuses to acknowledge this and are still teaching students the discredited "social construct" theory of gender that Money had championed. It's wrong. He lied to save his reputation and his ego. It's public knowledge now. Just search for David Reimer BBC to see for yourself. David Reimer is John/Joan.

[alterglobo]

Pfff.. IS THIS IT??? I EXPECTED SO MUCH OF BUTLER. But all I find is sooo thin. Seriously. IS THIS IT? So, very basic, banal, trivial silogic elements missing: Of course we perform our gender, gender is performed and performative. But WHERE DO YOU INFER THAT BY PERFORMING IT ITS (ALLEGED) MOTOR DOES NOT EXIST? I am not affirming anything. I am merely inquiring. How does the fact that we perform something inform us about the origin, character, (id) entity of who we are and that very performance? How does the performance exclude the possibility of us being something outside the performance?

(I hope I am waaaay wrong, because so far this smells like a cheap postmodern borrowing, clumsily tried to made fit to the author's particularity. Yes, gays do exist 100% legitimately but are we trying to legitimise LGBT by denying the ontological definers of gender?) Yes, "normal", in the sense of casuistic, statistical ontic occurrence.

I hope somebody will soon criticise me, destroy me and show me what fundamental ontological self-evidence I am missing because THIS IS SO FAR VERY MEDIOCRE.

[BrotherWoody]

Albert Camus wrote in "Create Dangerously", "I have always thought there were two kinds of intelligence---intelligent intelligence and stupid intelligence." Judith Butler's Gender theories were constructed by the second kind of intelligence, imo. Rather than being a liberating force in society, they become an oppressive force negating both biology & natural law. Humans are the products of both nature & nurture, however, her sole concentration on right nurture belies the constitutive elements of nature that are fixed & not malleable.

[ucokalpigari]

"Pyschology Today" has an interesting article about the science of gender differences. There are around 100 known gender differences in psychological functioning. Many more will be discovered in time. The idea that gender is not rooted in biology and psychology is an ignorant ill-informed position. Butler is a willy ignorant charlatan. Gender is deeply rooted in biology.

[oobond]

Menina, faz um filho em outra menina, hahahahahaha. BOLSONARO 2018

[jackieredding]

Go to the remotest tribes that are cut off from society and then do your little test!!!