Political Spectrum Explained

Political Spectrum is explained in this video. The terms left-wing politics and right-wing politics can often be misunderstood. So, what is the political spectrum and How it looks like? I have explained where political ideologies like Socialism, Communism, Conservatism, Capitalism, Environmentalism and lie on the Political spectrum. The terms left wing and Right wing were first used in the ideological context during the French Revolution of the 18 century. This video also shows where the political parties like Democrats, Republicans, Conservatives, UK Independence Party, Green Party, Labour Party, and Liberal Democrats lie on Political Spectrum
Eclectic is a channel which provides interesting and educational content about a range of political, philosophical, economic and historical topics.

Do Like Subscribe and Share.

[FlyingT]

You deserve more views. This is a good video

[thatsbhavya]

Bro see in india 😂 here leftist are those who hate india and right wing people are the nationalist ! Nothing is similar here as you said in this video ! 😂😂😂

[AnujSingh-kkqt]

I was confused that what is left and right wing .Thanks a lot

[guitarrcat]

Imagine thinking Hillary is leftist.

I threw up I’m my mouth a lil bit just typing that...

[niharranjanmishra]

Bjp follows right wing ideology. But due to some of it's left wing acts like giving free money to poor and incrising tax by GST the Indian economy is down now.

[gomboach]

Well, the "Indian guy explaining" memes were right. SO RIGHT. Thank you for the video.

[simrankaur]

Greatly explained, cleared all my doubts! Amazing videos👏👏🙌🙌

[krishnanair]

What am I if I am a capitalist who actively supports gay rights and abortion rights for women and Greta Trunberg??

[Albeit_Jordan]

I have poor vision so my eyes are constantly playing tricks on me, and whenever this video shows up in my recommendations I always initially read it as "Political Speedruns Explained" and I always think for a moment "What the f*ck is a political speedrun?"

and now I want to know

I literally just came here to comment this

[m.r]

Did you really put Abraham Lincoln on the right wing 🤦‍♂️

[gianfrancoardisson]

In politics, the dividing line between Right and Left can be traced back to two obsessions:
- the first (the torment of the Right) is a phobia of elements perceived to be incompatible with commonly used models in society
- the second (the bane of the Left) is intolerance of models that appear to be imposed by society.
In order to capture the meaning of these lines, we need to step back in time and recall the turmoil we experienced early in life as we began the process of blending into society when, as kids, we entered Planet School- or more precisely, Planet Classroom.
Right there in the classroom we’ve all had to deal with a “problem kid”: “bad Johnny”- the student with the disrespectful, smug attitude and less than decent grades, the kid in the back that stole your lunch money, the chronic late-comer who seemed to own a single tattered and over-doodled notebook, the bully you best avoided if you didn’t want to find yourself running home bruised and with a ripped school uniform. The hopeless case that once had the nerve to show his privates to the girl in the second row and who always came back from the boys’ room reeking of cigarette smoke.
No doubt that “bad Johnny” has raised concerns- more for some than for others- within the classroom/society. However, we can’t forget that other classmate of ours who is at the root of perhaps even more devastating issues- “Peter goody-two-shoes”. He came from a good family, he always sat in the front row, paid attention in class, gave a helping hand to less fortunate people, had good manners, dressed smartly, respected the teachers, sported perfect hairstyles and neatly organized books. The one who carefully put his school supplies away at the end of class, who always did his homework, who had the best grades- the one who came to school early each morning and couldn’t seem to wait to get started.
He was a model to look up to, our term of comparison when we sensed we couldn’t be good enough in the world of social competition. In fact, Peter popped up- in more or less obvious ways- any time our parents scolded us or our teacher criticized us.
And it was “Peter good-two-shoes” who really bothered us- especially when we felt his weight bearing down on our heads- a behavioral model imposed upon us by society.
It is of the utmost importance to note that, for the purposes of this “treatise”, “Peter goody-two –shoes” should not be considered “good” in an absolute sense- but rather a model society sees in a positive light (not always rightfully so) and, more than that, tries to impose upon us. Similarly, “bad Johnny” does not have to be the bad guy- rather just something society –often erroneously- considers negative.
You can see how Peter goody-two-shoes bothers people who are emotionally Left-wing, while an aversion to bad Johnny is the hallmark of Right-wingers.
- The idea that humans are intrinsically good belongs to the Left. In this case, “bad Johnny” is not a great danger to society. Leftist ideology borrows Rousseau’s belief that people are good by nature, even if at times they are led astray by society. It is noteworthy that “Peter goody – two – shoes”, the Left’s obsession, represents society and the model it demands to impose.
- The idea that some people are naturally diabolical is Right-wing: this belief derives from the suspicion that anyone could be a potential evil “bad Johnny”. In the Right’s vision, inspired by Hobbes, humans are evil by nature. They are always out to swindle, subjugate or rob others: hence the "Homo homini lupus" (man is a wolf for men) idea. In this case, it becomes society’s job to correct “bad Johnny” at any cost, if necessary by “sufficiently persuasive” means.
The “Peter goody – two – shoes” theory is therefore a sociologically relevant construct which delineates the meaning of the dichotomous conundrum afflicting each and every one of us in our relationship with society as a whole:
- On one hand, the refusal of models society itself endeavours to impose;
- On the other, the perception of elements not in line with the dominant paradigms as alien to society.

From “La morale del biasimo inverso” (The Moral of Inverse Reproach) - Gianfranco Ardisson

[sandeeproy]

India has no right wing ....there is "Indic wing"

[RocketmanRockyMatrix]

What are your thoughts about Libertarianism?

[AnkitRaj-qhix]

Hey, Buddy.It was good enough.You explained it quite well..Thank You

[iamsunnykumar_]

seriously it was really nice...very calmly explained the things

[sidharthboora]

very well explained far better then other videos.

[ricktalks]

imIdont believe people will become lazy .. but i get you view...

[MrALenCar]

We need a hybrid wing. That's neither right or left.

[rkbando]

Its quite wrong to say that Keynesian economics does not support free market economy.

[rkdqwqh]

Hey brother thankyou very much, it helps me to understand this topic clearly.🙏