Will This Ai REPLACE Blender Artists?

I know this video will trigger some of y'all, but thanks for watching anyways! :)

Here are the links mentioned in the video:
👉 TopChannel1on1: @TopChannel1on1

~~~~~
Thank y'all so much for watching!! Means the world :)
~~~~~

✅ ALL MY PRODUCTS FOR 97% OFF ✅

🔗 My Links:

✉️ Email Me:

Thanks for watching Will This Ai Software REPLACE Blender Artists?
#blender #render #rendering #blender3d #blendercommunity

[Benji_D]

Would love to hear your opinions on this! Feel free to drop a comment :)

[AmaruArriola]

I heard many people saying that AI cant replicate the emotion or value of a true artistic piece, they are right, but, NOBODY WILL CARE, the big companys like disney will use ai because is cheaper and faster and most people will see it as the greatest thing since they dont need to study or practice skills like painting or sculpting, the ai will do everything with a line of text, most people are lazy and wont give nothing for an artistic piece with merit, they can do whatever they want easy and fast, the companies will do the same.

[hashiramasenju]

As a wise man once said, "A calculator and a mathematician do not perfrom the same function."

[brianbergmusic]

How liberating. We no longer need to concern concern ourselves with soul-crushing tasks like form, technique and process.

[PixiiBomb]

For AI in general, the jobs will just evolve to create new types of roles.
People are kind of freaking out about this technology, but in reality, this has been happening for decades.

When Photoshop came out, artists everywhere were panicking.
But Adobe's technology didn't make artists obsolete. Instead, it created "digital artists"

The same can be said for Frontend and Backend Frameworks, Web and App Makers, etc.

These tools make our current jobs a lot faster, and create new types of jobs in the near future.
We'll likely see a lot more people specializing in "AI Cleanup / Refinement / Stylize"
And even "AI Prompt Generator" will be a job title.

And at the end of the day, these types of tools are great for prototyping and quick projects, but you still need ACTUAL HUMANS who ACTUALLY KNOW "how the sausage is made", because those are the people that have to build the architecture and engineer the project for optimization, customization, scale and re-usability.

[Jujuji]

im my personal opinion rather than being the end of artist, im thinking that this might be the end of big studios, just think of it ai can do all of that so why artist will be thinking of being hired in a animation studio when they can be doing their own series or movie witht other 3 or 5 animators, this already its happening in some way everything everywhere at all at once was a movie made by a group of friends with a very cheap budget

[LordCinn]

as a 3D artist whose been doing my job professionally for over 9 years. simple answer: No

[misberave]

I hope companies won’t be allowed to use AI 3-D models in their games because they are based on training of real persons models.

[MartKart]

I'm puzzled if a business uses AI art, is that breaking copyright laws because the business owned can't own AI art, something like how a monkey took a picture using a mans camera, the guy tried to claim copyright, expect that the monkey that was smiling owned the copyright.

[mohandalattab]

Ai still creates traditional distorted shapes that require modification, perhaps taking time more than doing it from scratch to edite.

[joaquimpipa]

Most of the lip sync to translation language software I have seen and can afford is limited to having your model looking straight forward minimum head movement, low background sound and single character talking. When and if it improves to the point of having two, three, or more models having a conversation facing each other as they move, turn their heads while they walk, run, etc with background sounds created without experience, then animators will need to be redefined.

[shodan]

But hey what about doing product renders you can’t just ai generate a random perfume
Bottle it’s gotta be the exact design they give you

[tatatom]

Show the topology of that models and i'll tell you. 😉

[DinoPopToys]

Ai cannot replace artist fully. But company could adapt to AI for efficiently work flow.

[lord_gillespie]

I'm getting so tired of this rhetoric. Anyone who has ever interacted with an AI can very quickly see that they have serious limitations, especially in the realms of artistic expression.

[TriZon-doex]

In the near future, 3D artists won't be completely replaced, as the expertise of skilled 3D modelers will still be crucial for refining generated 3D models. AI serves as a foundational tool for 3D modelers in the creation process.

[darthsadic]

It is just another tool to make your work faster. But AI can't express your thoughts and emotions, as long as you are a real artist and not a lazy 3D user you'll be fine.

[the.editing.knight]

"you still need an artist to bring it all together" Bro, the I have heard it somewhere else 😁

[RaphieDevelopment]

Lets hope that there will be some kind of special AI copyright laws that stop companies from using them too much.

[Redzzeero]

Ai will reach a stage where it will stop developing because it will need more data. It is impossible for it to invent new ideas or new methods out of thin air. Therefore, it will inevitably need to be updated with new data. It will always remain behind humans and their creativity