The Theology of the Historical Paul - Linwood Jackson Jr.

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Twitter: @Jacob56723278

[robinstevenson]

Jacob, I wish you had asked him more questions, because the way this is presented it's just him talking and talking, with no interruptions, and that is less than ideal.

[beerexperience]

I really like Linwood Jackson Jr.
He is paying very close attention to detail. He's paying close attention to words, word patterns, and to story patterns.
Very bright individual.

[Catholic-Perennialist]

20:40 God the Father is an invention. Finally, someone with the balls to admit it.

[wingedlion]

fascinating perspective, thanks for sharing

[robinstevenson]

Agree - the supposed connection of Paul with Gamaliel is a false connection, most certainly, since Paul tried to annihilate the Jesus movement, while Gamaliel thought it best to leave them alone, as you put it.

[hogbenfan]

When I read it, I don't find Paul riding on an animal on his trip to Damascus

[taylor]

Interesting, but seems highly speculative.

[eximusic]

Hmmm, he seems to have a pseudo-critical approach that treats Acts as if it's history, isn't aware of the current consensus of which Pauline letters are authentic, and thinks that Matthew is the first new testament book chronologically. If you're trying to give equal time to people outside of scholarship who are unaware of the last century of New Testament criticism, then kudos. Finally, all religions have a trinity?? News to me.