Fixing Aggregation Behavior Changes in Spring Data MongoDB After Update

Discover how to resolve unexpected aggregation behavior in Spring Data MongoDB after updating Spring Boot. Learn to customize the `MappingMongoConverter` to maintain compatibility without modifying existing queries.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Aggregation works unexpectedly after spring-data-mongo-db library update

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Fixing Aggregation Behavior Changes in Spring Data MongoDB After Update

Updating libraries can sometimes lead to unexpected challenges, especially when it comes to ORM frameworks. A recent question raised by a developer reflects this situation perfectly: after upgrading Spring Boot from version 2.2.2.RELEASE to 2.5.2, their aggregations began to behave erratically. Let's delve into the issue and explore a viable solution.

The Problem: Unexpected Aggregation Changes

After updating to a newer version of Spring Boot, the developer encountered a problem with their MongoDB aggregation queries. In their original implementation, they were using the following Kotlin code for their aggregation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This code worked seamlessly in version 2.2.2.RELEASE, but after the update, the sameUser parameter suddenly required a list instead of a single object, causing the developer's application to throw exceptions.

Why the Change Occurred

Changes like these can occur when there are updates or refactoring in the underlying libraries. It often leads to breaking changes where functionalities that were previously accepted become incompatible in new versions. In this case, the aggregation handling behavior was modified, leading to the unexpected requirement for a list in the sameUser field.

The Solution: Creating a Custom MappingMongoConverter

The developer sought a solution that would allow them to avoid modifying their existing queries or objects due to the extensive amount of work already invested in their codebase. The solution they arrived at involved creating a custom MappingMongoConverter, which ultimately resolved the discrepancies caused by the library update.

Steps to Implement the Solution

Extending MappingMongoConverter:

Create a new class that extends from MappingMongoConverter.

This ensures that you can modify the default behavior without altering the existing structure considerably.

Handling Direct Injection Issues:

Recognize that some Spring classes may inject MappingMongoConverter directly rather than through the MongoConverter interface.

By extending the same class, your custom converter will receive direct injections seamlessly.

Implement the Custom Logic:

Within your new converter class, implement logic that transforms the output of your aggregations to match the required structure, without modifying your queries.

This can involve converting single objects into lists where necessary.

Use Java for Compatibility:

If necessary, write the custom converter in Java for compatibility with the MappingMongoConverter’s original implementation.

This can make it simpler to integrate and leverage existing features.

Example of Custom Converter Implementation

Here’s an illustrative (simplified) example of how you might structure your custom converter:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

While library updates can introduce breaking changes that might disrupt your workflow, solutions do exist that allow you to maintain your existing code while adapting to new requirements. By creating a custom MappingMongoConverter, developers can handle the changes imposed by updates like that of Spring Boot with minimal fuss.

If you find yourself facing similar challenges, consider exploring custom converters or other extension points provided by your libraries. Adapting to change can seem daunting, but with the right approach, you can navigate the complexities of library evolution effectively.