49 - The Dead Zone (1983)

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I honestly feel like doing something like that would be wrong because at that time they are an innocent baby and so I would say at his turning point if anything so it would then be when he was bad but he didn't kill anyone yet

rizzigforce
Автор

The problem with the question is that it forces you believe in one or two time-travel theories. The linear paradox, where killing baby Hitler would remove the desire to go back in time to kill him in the first place since the Holocaust never happens, so in turn you couldn't kill him but in turn would somehow facilitate saving his life in some way. Or multiverse theory in which you don't actually stop the Holocaust, but only create a new timeline in which the Holocaust doesn't happen, which may or may not be the future you are returning to. BUT if it's the morality of killing a baby who is currently innocent but going to do something absolutely horrendous, I'd elbow drop him right in the fontanelles XD but I'm not exactly a picture of moral acuity lol

fatal_sightxgaming
Автор

i would say if he was a baby i would give him love and make sure to raise him properly so he wouldn’t do that kind of thing

morelifenodying
Автор

Maybe somebody can't break the bank on genysus 20 let's ask Stepheny

CarolFleming-du