Lies by Ancient High Technologists: Still selling Core 7 as a spiral & still crying cover up.

@dannyjones you've been scammed, Ben lied right to your face in your own studio!
#lostancienthightechnology #core7 #ancientegypt
Core 7 is one of those artefacts that the advocates of Lost Ancient High Technology industry claim to be a smoking gun. They claim this granite core must have been created using an advanced lost ancient high technology and the enigma of this has been "proven" by science, while also claiming a cover up against them to conceal the truth.
This argument was settled over two years ago, and it is still being resurrected to sell the greater package of a lost advanced civilisation.
Those who are at the forefront of this know full well about the work that has been done, since they themselves demanded it, and in the case of Ben from Uncharted X he is actively telling falsehoods and still demanding the work be done.

Evidence For Super Advanced Ancient Technology | Ben Van Kerkwyk (Recent podcast where Ben from Uncharted X repeats the calims that he knows full well have been debunked, as well as the allegations of a cover up against Christopher Dunn)

Christopher Dunn's page on Core 7

Out-of-place artifact: 100 years of deception | Fake science spotlight

Making Egyptian Drill Holes: Lost Ancient High Technology

Experiments in Granite & Primitive Technology playlist

Jon Bodsworth photo of core 7 that the Lost High Tech types claim was intentionally manipulated

Christopher Dunn and his "symmetrical" statue evidence.

Chistopher Dunn faking experiments to serve his own purposes

To support this channel,

Join this channel to get access to perks:

[peterwikvist]

Drilling in Amarna. "Recently, a fragment of stone with traces of drilling has been found in Amarna. The bottom of these drill holes were covered with a dried-out greenish pulp – a mixture of particles of abrasive, ground stone, and oxidized copper from a tube. The abrasive component consisted of corundum grains (Mohs hardness 9) a large deposit of which has been revealed at Wadi Hafafit." - Oleg Kruglyakov, 2018

[SacredGeometryDecoded]

To anyone of those Lost Ancient High Technology industry shills who still want to argue the point the challenge remains open. In a livestream you can tell us all why it is impossible to replicate with the tools depicted by the Egyptians and I can drill away on camera in real time. All the while a certain smug gin of satisfaction growing as your grift dies in public, on your channel no less. You'll still profit from the views though so you'll at least get that which you really seek above all else.

[a_lucientes]

You can just look at a high resolution image of the core without any threads, and see theyre not consistent. Not only that, but numerous people (yourself included) have made these drills according to the drawings and descriptions left to us by the Egyptians and produced the exact same thing, with the same tapered shapes from the wiggling of the copper tube as it was being spun around unevenly, and the exact same threads on them!. What more could anyone ask for? Miano (World of Antiquity channel) did a video on this that completely debunks it as well. What annoys me most of Uncharted X and Bright Insight is their claims that academia will not address these issues..even though we have entire books written on the subject by experts in the field, and videos, like Miano's directly addressing their claims, and yet they just ignore them. That makes them frauds. It's one thing to be misled and quite another to be intentionally disingenuous.

[LesterBrunt]

I used to believe in LAHT because I was naive and contrarian. But the moment I saw the explanations and counter arguments I immediately recognized that LAHT makes no sense at all.

How could I possibly think that after hundreds of years of archeology, hundreds of thousands of people studying it with more passion and depth than I have studied anything, that they never wondered about these things. Graham Hancock and such are somehow the first ones to question the building techniques?
Hundreds of thousands of people reading every encyclopedia about Ancient Egypt, doing science on the actual sites, studying the history from the particular to the general for their entire life, all missed this seemingly obvious problem that these buildings are “impossible”.

To think that 18-25 year old idealistic naïve students of archeology aren’t looking for ways to find all the cool stuff in history is hilarious, the university age above average intelligence are the people doing the most psychedelics and whatnot, chances are fairly high that at least someone is on some acid or shroom afterglow during monday morning archeology lecture.
But when you actually go in depth into a subject at university level you quickly learn that the “real” stuff is far more interesting, mindblowing and practical than the Hancockian “ what if…..” fantasies. Then you find out that the theories are not just something a scientists came up with on a random day but amalgamations of 100+ years of research from thousands of scientists from all over the world with all kinds of specializations and expertise.

It is completely ridiculous to think all those people never were like “wait a minute, if you calculate how they had to build this it is actually impossible” or that they dig up some ancient artifact, go through the painstaking process of dating it through several long and systematic methods but never think “what technology was used to produce this artifact”.
It is a child’s idea of what archeology is, as if it is just brushing away some dirt while you are dressed as Indiana Jones holding up some old pot and declaring whatever you think it is to be, preferably something cool like “omg, this is an ancient pot from the Phrygians, it should not exist in this cultural layer” and then you have to fight some weird cultist guys to steal some artifact but then before you can finally show the world the “real truth” you are invited to a castle where the pope, the US president and some weird asian monk who doesn’t say anything tell you that you can’t expose this truth because it is too dangerous but you will get free money and free pass to explore everything else, etc. etc.

[joshmcinnesart]

Well you convinced me in a about 4 minutes. And I thought they were right. Ty

[BSIII]

'Lost Ancient High Technology', when it should more truthfully be called 'Lost Ancient Techniques', but that wouldn't sell as much.
4000 years ago, they had stone working techniques that were honed for thousands of years even before their time. We've lost those techniques so we have opportunists building entire career grifts off the mystery while implanting fabulous and fantastical claims around it. The sad part is when I keep hearing, "the Ancient Egyptians could not have built these Pyramids, or colossal statues, they inherited them and graffitied their names on it."
There are literal paintings of Egyptians carving massive statues by hand standing on wood scaffolding. Hey, let's refuse that. There's paintings of them using bow tube drills. Nah, mUh gRaNiTe mOhS sCaLe.

I too have spent a few years making those cookie-cutter claims high technology and inheritance, but I don't refuse to accept evidence that challenges my beliefs. Mysteries and theories are fun, but so is experimentation that explains some of these mysteries, which sometimes proves a mystery is not as mysterious as you once thought. A bow copper tube drill is not as cool as an ancient powersaw. Lol

[GroberWeisenstein]

Granite has soft and hard minerals of different grain sizes. These variations are magnified by manual core drilling with loose abrasives. Uneven pressure and slurry abrasive fed at intervals leads to side drift which we see in the form of sidewall striations. With modern diamond tools mounted on core machine rigs the result is smoothly consistent sidewalls with little to no striated tooling marks.

[peterwikvist]

London based photographer Rebecca Phillips-Lee, took high resolution photographs of "Core 7" on March 2, 2020. This made it possible to create a panoramic view of the entire core surface and examine its features in great detail. Some conclusions from this: The grooves are sometimes even and smooth, sometimes they whimsically wriggle and break. The groove depth is unpredictable. Geologist and mineralogist P. Selivanov, traced every groove. There is not a single unbroken groove, not one goes all the way around.

[markuscamenzind]

never saw the high resolution picture, but even before i wondered if a spiral was made after the drilling.
now i see it is not even a spiral.
thanks for your work.

[occamsrouter]

Ben traded his balls for a grilled goat cheese sandwich and a grape Fanta at the Machu Picchu gift shop.

[Helmy]

Even with a tube made of diamonds, there is no way on earth with modern machines could the granite be drilled with a feed rate of 2.5 mm per rotation, such feed pressure will crush the granite before completing half round... unless they had an ancient advanced granite 😂😂

[phillhinkler]

You are quite correct in stating that the feed rate is not consistent and machine like, but some of the tool marks are quite far apart which indicates a very high rate of removal of material for that revolution.
For me the overall high rate of removal of the material is the most interesting question that needs to be addressed.

[peterwikvist]

Core seven is their Holy Grail. "My Precious" as the fiction character "Gollum" would say. Here embodied in the form of ancient waste material.

[zedudli]

Bonus points for befuddled Limmy in the thumbnail

[newman]

These fools have made revenue stream out of their misleading narrative & ain't gunna give it up that easy !

[frosty]

lol, all the shit i got on UnchartedX's discord when i told them this years and years ago.
Oh the rage...

Copper is soft.. so its kinda perfect to jam tiny crystals into.
So the most logical and simple explaination here is simply some silicate crystals like quartz, or even harder abrasives got stuck in the copper, and left a mark until it was knocked lose again.

Literary no mystery or magic needed.

[heinpereboom]

I have another theory about drilling into this granite.

If the feed of the drill goes 500 times faster than the current modern drills can drill in granite, you have to wonder what forces are needed to achieve this.

If diamonds were used then, they would have damaged and broken many drills.
So there is clearly something else that made this speed possible.

Because the spiral grooves do not have the same distance between them, the drill seems to have been pressed in manually and sometimes pulled back a little, so that not a complete spiral has been created, but an irregular whole.

That strongly reminds me of soft material or uncured material.
That would also explain why the grooves are sometimes wavy, because this core may then have changed shape, creating a strange kind of surface.

With soft material, the core can also become conical, which you sometimes see with other hollow drills that drill in plastic material, because the soft core in the hollow drill will move and the top will move the most.

It would be advisable to examine the surface with a microscope to see if the red part of the granite consists partly of grit.
If so, it can just be granite with cement, because you can make concrete from almost any material and also give it a smooth finish.

[hollyingraham]

So basically, "This was a mystery in 1890, so no one can explain it since, except us!" Excuse me, but you couldn't get kids in Special Class to buy into this when I was in school. What has happened to human intelligence in the last half century?!

[nickauclair]

How can they tell lies for hours but not spend 10 minutes watching your videos on drill holes. Or the other channels. I guess that's too steep and high mountain. Like a trip from the quarry. Lol

[JesseP.Watson]

Completely illogical claim mechanically anyway - were it a constant-feed, single track spiral cut, there's 3 options to achieve that as far as I can see...
1. A long, thin, 'chisel' cutter as long as that core with one cutting edge being driven around in a circular path - which requires an absurdly strong material for the shank of the tool or it would snap or bend.
2. A minuscule, spinning miller cutter (like a dentist drill) again being driven around on a circular track, again with a 6+ inch long, very thin shaft which can fit in that groove - bizarrely complicated and fragile tool for the job.
3. A core (tube) drill with one cutting tooth protruding down to contact the stone... But an engineer with well developed mechanical knowledge would throw out a design like that the first time it passed through his mind.

A long, thin 'chisel' type cutter circling around is just daft in terms of fragility, the finest carbide, tungsten God knows what wouldn't take that strain... and a miller head type tool is only worthwhile if you've a milling machine built for other tasks which makes that level of sophistication cost effective for the job... and a core drill with one tooth is going to wear out 100 times faster than a core drill with 100 teeth or an abrasive (with hundreds/thousands or cutting edges)... a single toothed core drill which cut a spiral would only be a valid solution to the problem if you had a cutting blade that never bluntened.

None if it makes any sense at all.

(Scuse me... heheheh, pointless considerations in view of it not actually being a spiral anyway... but amusing technocal questions to work through 😉)