Hooked VS Hookless Rims

preview_player
Показать описание
I’m asked a lot of questions about hooked and hookless rims.  We use both types depending on what the rim is designed for to maximize their pros and cons and a video seemed like a great way of explaining the differences between the two rim types.  

So which is the best?  Well....both....
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

If you are riding road, just don't use hookless and you are good to go :)

ml
Автор

Spot on... stay hooked for high pressure rims until hookless technology/standards are better developed.

cxbkpmf
Автор

Actually, Hookless rims are WAY older than hooked rims. Hookless rims was called "straight side rims" from the 40's to 70's when they invented the hooked rims to make you able to use high preassure in the tires!. So we are going back to 40's tech and paying for it :D

AndrewTSq
Автор

Excellent video, thank you very much. Very very hard to find this quality of content anywhere else.

SydneySlowRider
Автор

I think the issue with road tubeless is as you said, tires and rims are not manufactured to tolerances that are exact enough. Thus loose fitting tires blowing off rims. I’ve been using tubeless on mountainbikes for over 20 years and still some tire and rim combinations aren’t ideal. I used road UST when it first came. I liked it when I was on Dura ace tubeless wheels with the Hutchinson UST certified tires. They were excellent. That first UST designation required that tires could be mounted by hand and pumped up with floor pump. Those tires also had carbon fibre beads so as not to stretch and potentially blow off. I think if a tire on a hookless rim fit tightly enough, that would solve the issues people have. Let’s not forget that regular clinchers with tubes can blow off hooked rims too. We use to see that once or twice a month in explosive fashion in the shops I worked at in the 80s.

andyeunson
Автор

The other issue is regarding heavier riders who require higher pressures on road wheels. Not all cyclists are skinny as a rail and weigh 130 lbs, For us bigger riders, hookless just doesn't work.

rickammons
Автор

Hi Tristan. Thanks for the summary. I'm interested to know where you see the the tipping point between what you define as low and high pressure?

michaelduane
Автор

hookless is tech for tech sake. there are no real user gains, however the gains come from the manufacturer. There is still no industry standard, Giant have only recommended a handful of tyres to use on their wheels.

nicensleazy
Автор

Giant slr1 with cadex race tyres user here. Honestly couldn’t be happier!
Riding bikes since many years back. At first I was reluctant about this change but after tried I wouldn’t go back.

magnusschroeder
Автор

Please stay hooked. Most of the people don’t understand and will not pay attention to very specific instructions and majority of riders with little experience will put more than 72-75 psi and that’s when accident will happen.

alexsvetlitski
Автор

Has anyone found statistically which brands of tires cause problems?
the rims can be measured to the nearest cent when they come out of the mold and there is a precise common standard to be respected.
for tyres, on the contrary, there is no standard yet, the hookless coupling tolerance is the most important aspect to avoid these dangers ( second one 80s vintage pressures at 8 atm)
a well-known Italian cotton rubber declared hl compatible goes on a rim with just one hand, it will clearly come off with the same ease or worse after use, same for some continental years 2020-21 now modified and within very tight, suitable tolerances.
circumferences of tyre rings were measured with differences of up to 1.5 cm in total! how can we talk about a system that should be abandoned without a coupling rule?
as long as tire manufacturers have differences beyond the conceivable, system safety will not be proposed.
15 years ago the same MTB route, now standardized although without the push of common rules.

spadabike
Автор

I have to disagree that clincher tires are made from "lighter and more supple" materials, than tubulars. Tubular tires are almost always lighter than clinchers, and more supple, if built with cotton casings. The rims are always lighter because they do not have the "ears" formed on them, to "grab" the bead of the clincher tire.
I can see hookless rims on bikes that use 30mm tires. Hookless rims with 25mm tires seem rather silly.

billkallas
Автор

I say if its not broken, don't fix it. I like gatorskins at 90psi. I don't think I can ride that on hookless.

pablomarquez
Автор

Does not explain hook vs hookless
My tire says installed only on hooked rims. How do I know if my rim is hooked or hookless?

joshiprasanna
Автор

I use Cadex 65 with Cadex Aero tires & Zipp 404 Firecrest with Continental 5000 AS tr tires. I'll take hookless over hooked any day. The Mavic Comete Pro SL's that I use to use, were hell to work with.

gsmd
Автор

You could approve certain tyres and rims !? it's a lot of work, and you'd have to offer a limited choice.

gren
Автор

hookless rims were used on bikes long before 2000s . have a look at the majority of steel rims pre 1980 they are hookless,

michaeloneil
Автор

I can see wheel and tire engineers discovered new legal marijuana. Unfortunately no one told them how powerful it is. I can see it already; ZIIPPPpp Zippp Zi Zi ZIiiiipp, hey dude, hey it's your turn, take a dragg dude... !!!... HEY ...!!! I got it! let's get rid of that ugly hook bead no one can see or knows about!!! Dude, dude, that's Awesome... Koool, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha... .. .. . .
I'm a wheel tire specialist and that has to be the dumbest idea ever to go down a freaking Rabit Hole... " DON'T DO IT"! It's bad enough some popular brand tubeless tires already blow off hooked rims, but this takes stupid to a whole new level. It's sheer suicide.

danielsotelo
Автор

Hold on ! I am NOT a ‘fan’ of tubes. I use tubes because I don’t want that garbage milk stuff in my wheels. Ever !
Here is my prediction: NOBODY wants to fiddle with sticky milk so hookless is dead.

Check-it-out