Mr.Justice (retd) S.Nagamuthu Sr.Adv. Extraterritorial jurisdiction of a HC to quash FIR, cri. P1

preview_player
Показать описание
Friday Group:
Topic: Extraterritorial jurisdiction of a HC to quash criminal cases - Part 1
Speaker: S. Nagamuthu Mr. Justice (Retd.), Sr. Advocate Supreme Court of India
Organizer : G.Seshagiri Rao, Advocate Supreme Court of India.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Justice Nagamuuthu sir is Always Great. Thank you for his Excellent erudite lecture. Thanks Again.

shekhartalashilkar
Автор

Very useful for me as a junior advocate

venkatesanpalani
Автор

How I wish such eminent advocate speaks on Why UP Has Least High Court Benches in India And Why West UP Has None When It Is UP which owes for the maximum number of pending cases in India and why West UP which owes for more than half of the total number of pending cases has none? Why lawless Bihar has not even a single HC Bench? Why a peaceful State like Maharashtra which tops in the latest justice index ranking of the State list has maximum number of Benches and so also Karnataka has Bench for just four districts at Dharwad and 8 districts of Gulbarga respectively but for 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crores people has not even a single HC Bench!? My best wishes and best regards, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate

sanjeevsirohi
Автор

Why West UP accounts for more than half of the total number of pending cases of UP and still has not even a single HC Bench? Why former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon termed UP as the rape and crime capital of India and still has just one Bench and that too so near to Allahabad at Lucknow only and nowhere else? Why UP has maximum number of pending cases and still just one Bench? Please speak on this also! Why lawless Bihar has no Bench and why Maharashtra which is the most peaceful State and tops in the latest justice index ranking list and still has maximum number of Benche s? Why no one speaks on this? Regards and best wishes, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate

sanjeevsirohi
Автор

Dear Rao Sir, good evening

You are doing a great job.

The concept of territorial jurisdiction is very important. In this talk, one thing was missing. If we see set 2(g) (h) investigation, inquiry it can be done only where the incident took place. The reason is simple. Every piece of evidence will be available only at the place of occurrence of the crime.

Therefore, the cause of action and place of occurrence of crime can not be distinguished. Even registration of FIR and taking cognizance does not make any difference. So making difference on this basis also not seems qualified.

🙂 please put this submission before Speaker.

With Regards

rakeshdubey
Автор

No one can outdo him in criminal law and His Lordship is my Guru.

Vijay-bvvd