NASA’s $30 Billion Moon Return Mission, Explained | Beyond Earth

preview_player
Показать описание
NASA announced its returned mission to the moon by 2024, titled Artemis it will cost an estimated $20-$30 billion. They plan to go to the moon in their SLS mega-rocket and begin building a lunar gateway. The mission will focus on the possibilities of mining resources on the moon, including water for rocket fuel and will lead to future deep space travel and lunar bases in what can be considered the new era of space exploration.

MORE SPACE CONTENT:
What Happens To The Human Body In Space
Elon Musk's Multibillion Dollar Mars Rocket, Explained
NASA’s 4-Year Twin Experiment Takes Us Closer To Mars Than Ever Before

------------------------------------------------------

#NASA #Moon #TechInsider

Tech Insider tells you all you need to know about tech: gadgets, how-to's, gaming, science, digital culture, and more.


------------------------------------------------------

NASA’s $30 Billion Moon Return Mission, Explained | Beyond Earth
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

NASA: can we have a budget of us military?
US: no
NASA: we found oil on moon..





US: *GIVE THIS MAN A BUDGET, THE MOON NEEDS FREEDOM*

RAV
Автор

Everyone: sls is amazing

Spacex starship: am I a joke to you

fionnbarrett
Автор

Let's raid the moon. They cant stop us all.

shahimagesyt
Автор

It will be a lifetime experience if we can watch livestream of moonwalk. Good luck nasa.

Poly_Shannon
Автор

When a company is more expensive than a trip to the moon, Disney bought Fox for 41 billion more than this.

ThePowerpointMaster
Автор

“Worlds most powerful rocket”. That is until Starship/Super Heavy flies which, by every metric I can think of, will surpass the SLS.

Aubstract
Автор

Stop comparing SLS to falcon heavy, this is just shoddy journalism when Starship is on the horizon.

unconnected
Автор

SpaceX is a private company that can do fast iterations through each rocket. NASA is a government agency that any change requires many paper works and discussions. Also to get support from the congress, the rocket is been built from different states all over the U.S. to employ more people. The decision of building the rocket in different states leads to less efficient production and more expensive budget than building it in just one or two states like SpaceX building the falcon nine or falcon heavy.

burggerbig
Автор

SpaceX has more ambitious project's, faster progress and innovative ideas

brianhn
Автор

“Space law basically says that you can’t claim land in space”

No. It says that governments can’t do that. Nothing about individuals or private companies.

bitsbytes
Автор

One small step for man, one giant leap for techkind. Let's get that moon cheese

AverytheCubanAmerican
Автор

My prediction - Starship will soon turn SLS into an instant museum piece. Musk and Bezos are the future in space launch vehicle development IMO. Relatively cheap access to space is on the horizon allowing NASA to spend more on science and research. A win win.

dougm
Автор

I hope the camera man left on the moon 🌝 is ok 0:10

lijie
Автор

Nasa is planning to make sci-fi film 😂

romenpal-mf
Автор

I’ve been to the moon in kerbal space program.

TheLiamster
Автор

SLS should have launched in 2017.
It's now... [looks at watch]
...2019

SocksWithSandals
Автор

its funny how SLS will hold that title till starship and super heavy break it a few months after Artemis 1

mikemclaughlin
Автор

I swear if we all just work together we'd be up there by now lol.

jasonhollis
Автор

Best of luck to NASA And Godspeed to the men and women who push the boundary of science and technology

Jonathan-ieqv
Автор

Harder and harder to get excited about this when Space X is doing this cheaper, faster and actually innovating with reusable rockets. Give this money to Musk FFS

unconnected