The brain is our last frontier and consciousness is expanding | Dr. Heather Berlin | TEDxYouth@KC

The brain may seem mysterious, but here Dr. Berlin gives us a basic primer of consciousness and creativity. Heather’s talk illuminates the unique opportunities of the youth brain, mind and consciousness.

Dr. Heather Berlin is a cognitive neuroscientist and Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. She explores the complex interactions of the human brain and mind with the goal of contributing to improved treatment and prevention of impulsive and compulsive psychiatric disorders. She is also interested in the neural basis of consciousness, dynamic unconscious processes, and creativity, and is passionate about public outreach and science communication.

[Davesgotitmade]

She is so well-spoken and easy to understand. This is what needs to be taught everywhere!

[doreendumond]

18:09 Know Thyself. This lady is one of the most thoughtful speakers. Thoughtful as in I’m hearing a blast of thoughts in her every sentence. KNOW thyself. know THY self. know thy SELF. Thanks

[richardjoseph]

Our brain is the interface between our reality and the place that is sending the reality.

[a.m.senany]

The more we know, the more we realize that there is so much we don’t know.

[ambientscience]

"What we know is a drop what we don't is the ocean"- Isaac newton

[kellyd.rodgers]

Very, very good talk. Hopefully at some point in the future, 'science' proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt that the aware force which gives us conscious awareness lasts forever.
Perhaps this is a matter quantum physicists can look into as well.

[cley.]

I feel left out for just knowing all this, I am happy I do know this now but now I wonder what else don't kmow. My greatest desire right now is knowledge.

[Funandconsciousness]

Bravo, Heather!  Excellent talk.  Keep exploring!  And keep sharing.  It's what we do.

[DEMfilmsJWalsh]

I treat my brain like my iPhone, I don't know how it works but I love to use it

[robynkosta]

The last frontier is THE CREATOR, brain is only the instrument we have to use in this short life on Earth to get in touch with the DIVINE . And second for our personal use.

[brucetaylor]

It's been my understanding that the reptilian and limbic portions of the brain are different: the limbic corresponds to the mammalian aspect -- living in groups, sharing food, caring for the young. The reptilian section corresponds to our urge to fight or flee, kill indiscriminately, no sharing, etc. I think i read this in Carl Sagan's book, "The Dragons of Eden" an excellent read.

[sajinair]

The major error we commit is not perceiving this maya,
is that we perceive ourselves as seperate from our environment 🤔🧞‍♂️🕵️

[edgewaterz]

The brain is not the last frontier. The mind is the last frontier. And it is comprised of more than just the brain.

[cmarkme]

somewhere in the human is an awareness.. The brain is just a Reality Filtering Machine.. So Complex

[GroovismOrg]

Our unconscious drive is to create! Globally as One is our purpose . Please join our daily global community drum circle:

[marcobiagini]

I am a physicist and I will provide solid arguments that prove that consciousness cannot be generated by the brain (in my youtube channel you can find a video with more detailed explanations). Many argue that consciousness is an emergent property of the brain, but it is possible to show that such hypothesis is inconsistent with our scientific knowledges. In fact, it is possible to show that all the examples of emergent properties consists of concepts used to describe how an external object appear to our conscious mind, and not how it is in itself, which means how the object is independently from our observation. In other words, emergent properties are ideas conceived to describe or classify, according to arbitrary criteria and from an arbitrary point of view, certain processes or systems. In summary, emergent properties are intrinsically subjective, since they are conceptual models based on the arbitrary choice to focus on certain aspects of a system and neglet other aspects, such as microscopic structures and processes; emergent properties consist of ideas through which we describe how the external reality appears to our conscious mind: without a conscious mind, these ideas (= emergent properties) would not exist at all.

Here comes my first argument: arbitrariness, subjectivity, classifications and approximate descriptions, imply the existence of a conscious mind, which can arbitrarily choose a specific point of view and focus on certain aspects while neglecting others. It is obvious that consciousness cannot be considered an emergent property of the physical reality, because consciousenss is a preliminary necessary condition for the existence of any emergent property. We have then a logical contradiction. Nothing which presupposes the existence of consciousness can be used to try to explain the existence of consciousness.

Here comes my second argument: our scientific knowledge shows that brain processes consist of sequences of ordinary elementary physical processes; since consciousness is not a property of ordinary elementary physical processes, then a succession of such processes cannot have cosciousness as a property. In fact we can break down the process and analyze it step by step, and in every step consciousness would be absent, so there would never be any consciousness during the entire sequence of elementary processes. It must be also understood that considering a group of elementary processes together as a whole is an arbitrary choice. In fact, according to the laws of physics, any number of elementary processes is totally equivalent. We could consider a group of one hundred elementary processes or ten thousand elementary processes, or any other number; this choice is arbitrary and not reducible to the laws of physics. However, consciousness is a necessary preliminary condition for the existence of arbitrary choices; therefore consciousness cannot be a property of a sequence of elementary processes as a whole, because such sequence as a whole is only an arbitrary and abstract concept that cannot exist independently of a conscious mind.

Here comes my third argument: It should also be considered that brain processes consist of billions of sequences of elementary processes that take place in different points of the brain; if we attributed to these processes the property of consciousness, we would have to associate with the brain billions of different consciousnesses, that is billions of minds and personalities, each with its own self-awareness and will; this contradicts our direct experience, that is, our awareness of being a single person who is able to control the voluntary movements of his own body with his own will. If cerebral processes are analyzed taking into account the laws of physics, these processes do not identify any unity; this missing unit is the necessarily non-physical element (precisely because it is missing in the brain), the element that interprets the brain processes and generates a unitary conscious state, that is the human mind.

Here comes my forth argument: Consciousness is characterized by the fact that self-awareness is an immediate intuition that cannot be broken down or fragmented into simpler elements. This characteristic of consciousness of presenting itself as a unitary and non-decomposable state, not fragmented into billions of personalities, does not correspond to the quantum description of brain processes, which instead consist of billions of sequences of elementary incoherent quantum processes. When someone claims that consciousness is a property of the brain, they are implicitly considering the brain as a whole, an entity with its own specific properties, other than the properties of the components. From the physical point of view, the brain is not a whole, because its quantum state is not a coherent state, as in the case of entangled systems; the very fact of speaking of "brain" rather than many cells that have different quantum states, is an arbitrary choice. This is an important aspect, because, as I have said, consciousness is a necessary preliminary condition for the existence of arbitrariness. So, if a system can be considered decomposable and considering it as a whole is an arbitrary choice, then it is inconsistent to assume that such a system can have or generate consciousness, since consciousness is a necessary precondition for the existence of any arbitrary choice. In other words, to regard consciousness as a property ofthe brain, we must first define what the brain is, and to do so we must rely only on the laws of physics, without introducing arbitrary notions extraneous to them; if this cannot be done, then it means that every property we attribute to the brain is not reducible to the laws of physics, and therefore such property would be nonphysical. Since the interactions between the quantum particles that make up the brain are ordinary interactions, it is not actually possible to define the brain based solely on the laws of physics. The only way to define the brain is to arbitrarily establish that a certain number of particles belong to it and others do not belong to it, but such arbitrariness is not admissible. In fact, the brain is not physically separated from the other organs of the body, with which it interacts, nor is it physically isolated from the external environment, just as it is not isolated from other brains, since we can communicate with other people, and to do so we use physical means, for example acoustic waves or electromagnetic waves (light). This necessary arbitrariness in defining what the brain is, is sufficient to demonstrate that consciousness is not reducible to the laws of physics. Besides, since the brain is an arbitrary concept, and consciousness is the necessary preliminary condition for the existence of arbitrariness, consciousness cannot be a property of the brain.
Based on these considerations, we can exclude that consciousness is generated by brain processes or is an emergent property of the brain. Marco Biagini

[charlesbrightman]

"The brain is not fully matured until about the age of 25." (per the video).

So, why do we send people to war at age 18?

[John]

This content is a vibrant exploration; akin to a book that was a vibrant exploration of similar ideas. "Unlocking the Brain's Full Potential" by Alexander Sterling

[trebledog]

So that light at the end of the tunnel is just the prefrontal cortex switching off the synapses in the most loving and caring perceived environment.

[vir]

Love the movie matrix it's all about the psychology of the brain and beyond ... I still watch it every weekend. Find something new to think about from the movie and the neuroscientist using the matrix in a third lecture twice. Say something about it...