Steven Crowder LIES On TimCast IRL

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video I discuss Steven Crowder's appearance on TimCast IRL I Explain how not only did Steven lie repeatedly, but he contradicted himself in that very same episode vindicating my previous video on this

Podcast Links:

Sources:

#Crowder #DailyWire #IamSean90

FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

One thing we can agree on is that Tim is the only host that talks about himself more than the guest lol

channel_no_longer_active
Автор

That contract was a gigantic slap in the face. There's no way you don't purposely write up a contract for just Steven crowder.
And a hand a guy like Crowder the most predatory of all predatory contracts is outrageous.

I still don't know how people are missing the fine detail that it wasn't 12 million a year salary it was $12 million a year to run an entire production company, film skits, fly out guests, shooting on location, renting filming spaces.

For daily wire to say that $12 million a year was going straight in Crowder's pocket is so disingenuous.

Galamoth
Автор

I have to disagree with you on this one. Taken the terms and context into account, here is how I see it. the two on the show said they never counter-offered, a counter offer is a specific response that would include everything they wanted, they did say the strike/ban terms were no good, and they wouldn't go forward with those there. That is a demand, but it isn't really a counter-offer. He also stated that his attorney may have responded high when they came in low, agent-attorney's often do that without their client's knowledge as a starting point of negotiations. So all of those things can be true at once and them not be lying.

Elucidus
Автор

I like what Barnes said abt it. U don't put shit in the contract if u don't hope fir it

williamcroft
Автор

It's interesting how any internet drama comes up and the entire internet is suddenly an expert in whatever the issue is.

annatardlordofderps
Автор

Oh god this is the weirdest public debate on who’s wrong. Seeing all these channels taking shots at each other is wild

drug_dad
Автор

Wrong. He didnt expose them AT ALL. They outted themselves!

jotun_
Автор

Does anyone find it interesting that TDW is an ad reading meme at this point, has a subscription service ($14/mo) and takes monetization money from YT and the likes, is lambasting Crowder for wanting money. You know the same Crowder that only has one ad read per show and is run exclusively by Mug Clubbers.

So who is really in it for the money?

lonelykiwibird
Автор

Knightswatch broke the contract down and let's you really know that Crowder was right. Please watch that if you want a clear understanding. I think people see the amount of money and just follow along since it's too much for our blood but to people like DW and Crowder, they deal with millions all the time so they aren't the same as us.

TheDarkRaven
Автор

Regardless of the money topic, I do really think that he’s standing on principal and the up and coming people on the conservative side. I support Steven!!

evelyncband
Автор

He counteroffered to remove those social media terms Jeremy said it was non negotiable and crowder said they were non negotiable this was never a secret. Does it really take you 40mins to say this.

wadeobryan
Автор

How is that disingenuous if you take into consideration that part of the counter offer was them permanently removing some of the shady stipulations from future contracts? Given the full context of that specific video, I felt he stated it quite plainly.

MrStimpson
Автор

Sean I disagree with a 100 percent but I’m not going to unsubscribe and not watch your content or anything like that. Just know there are ppl out there who can disagree and still watch someone’s content

johnclaymore
Автор

"It presupposes that it's a good dollar amount" No... It' presupposes that it's a HIGH dollar amount. But, the question of GOOD vs BAD is what is what your selling worth to you?
Come on Actual Justice Warrior. You do indeed have critical thinking skills when you want to. I find it hard to believe that in this context you couldn't find a way to not bias your opinions. presupposing that you KNOW what your doing... the question is WHY.

surveysays
Автор

Sorry Shaun but this video is an L for you. I can see why people are calling you a daily wire shill

officialdislikebutton
Автор

You lose me when you read a contract and give the contract writer the benifit of the doubt. I promise you if crowder signed the contract and their was a dispute DW would say it was 110%. If someone makes a promise, but its not in the contract that is what we call a lie. The contract is terrible for anyone.

calebfielding
Автор

The thing I don’t like about the DW contract is there is only downside but no upside if he brings in more than he thought

GratefulAmerican
Автор

I like your vids AJW, but I am going to have to disagree with you on this one. DW is clearly giving out shit deals and Crowder is big enough already to call it out.

sustainya
Автор

Anybody else like "I like them both, but I really don't care about this drama thar much"

zerocool
Автор

Jeremy admitted he refused to take away the penalties in his video.

koriclaypool