Ark of the Covenant and The Third Temple

preview_player
Показать описание
#bible #religion #moses #god #jesus #armageddon #thirdtemple #arkofthecovenant
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Technically Is-ra-el wasn't supposed to become a nation again until the messiah came.
But the rabbs found a work around for that & 1948. A lot of non Z J's don't agree with them being a state.
Once again for the temple, it's supposed to be built by the messiah but those clever Rabbs have arguments why they shouldn't wait & want to go ahead with building it. "Temple institute"
I don't have a fully formed view on this but some thoughts.
J"s messiah = Cristian AntiChrist
The AntiChrist is supposed to be the great unifier, peace maker = DJT ?
DJT is a developer, & someone who's actually capable of building the third temple, which i think is already pre fabricated & ready to assemble as soon as the temple mount is cleared.
Idk if there's anything to that, but it's in the back of my mind.
I hope he's able to do what he says for this country, but I've never liked his cozy relationship with the settlers.
Great video!

staticintheattic
Автор

Love a new great channel of like minded people. Thanks Static. Keep up the great work Dudes

JoseyWales-ed
Автор

Love your channel two Dudes and Static! DJT sure seems to be a bad don..

YahsColibri
Автор

For those who talk of the Ark being a copied design.. The Israelites purposely used a common idol statue symbol and design with their “Ark of the Covenant” that was used by other nations at the time.. Then in between the angels where other cultures would place their God, the Israelites placed nothing. This is the symbolism and point the Israelites were making with the ark of the covenant towards the other nations who served false Idol lesser Gods. No false idols. No serving lesser Gods. Only the “unseen God” who is all.. It is a very deep symbolism and message within the Arks design.

BenEddy
Автор

Static sent me over. You got a new subscriber. I've binged your past videos. Great content. Thank you

AndrewCoburn-si
Автор

Well done, Two Dudes. I'm in Deep South and folks go ballistic at mildest derogatory comment re purveyors of ARK. Consider looking for connections between both major conflicts draining our coffers. DonJ has been well-schooled. Even provided media endorsements before current PM's election. Hope our homeless in WNC don't freeze to death.

topsham
Автор

The temple is the human body. The Ark of the Covenant houses the pineal gland within the human brain. We are in the midst of clearing the foundations for the new temple. Any seeking of this prophecy outside of the body was part of a design to hide this knowledge. The true treasure of the "knights Templar" is not a physical 'holy grail'. It is knowledge of the truth about the human connection to God. We are God. The rebuilding has already begun. Thank you for what you do.

HaveAGreatDay
Автор

Static referral, subscribed. Greetings from Johannesburg

urbanfarminrobin
Автор

New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below?

Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?

What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary.

God is not now a “racist”. He has extended His love to all races of people through the New Covenant fulfilled by His Son’s blood at Calvary. The Apostle Paul warned against using “genealogies” in our faith in 1 Tim. 1:4, and Titus 3:9.

If the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20 and the Old Covenant is "obsolete" in Hebrews 8:13, why would any Christian believe God is going back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?



Mat 24:1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
Mat 24:2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

Fort Antonia (Herod’s Praetorium, Acts 23:35) was built by Herod and given to the Romans. It was used to house the thousands of Roman soldiers needed to police the ancient city of Jerusalem.

In Acts 23:23 the Romans sent 470 soldiers to escort one man. Are we to believe all of the soldiers from the fort were sent with this one man?

During 73 AD the Jewish leader at Masada said the only thing left of Jerusalem was that which belonged to the Romans.

Mar 15:16 Then the soldiers led Him away into the hall called Praetorium, and they called together the whole garrison.

Act_23:35 he said, "I will hear you when your accusers also have come." And he commanded him to be kept in Herod's Praetorium.

Based on Acts 21:31-40, we know the Roman fort was above the temple because the soldiers had to go “down” to rescue Paul from the mob at the temple. Paul later spoke to the crowd below from the steps, as he was being taken up to Fort Antonia.

The following comes from Wars of the Jews, by Flavius Josephus, Book 5, Chapter 5, Section 8.

“8. Now as to the tower of Antonia, it was situated at the corner of two cloisters of the court of the temple; of that on the west, and that on the north; it was erected upon a rock of fifty cubits in height, and was on a great precipice; it was the work of king Herod, wherein he demonstrated his natural magnanimity. In the first place, the rock itself was covered over with smooth pieces of stone, from its foundation, both for ornament, and that any one who would either try to get up or to go down it might not be able to hold his feet upon it. Next to this, and before you come to the edifice of the tower itself, there was a wall three cubits high; but within that wall all the space of the tower of Antonia itself was built upon, to the height of forty cubits. The inward parts had the largeness and form of a palace, it being parted into all kinds of rooms and other conveniences, such as courts, and places for bathing, and broad spaces for camps; insomuch that, by having all conveniences that cities wanted, it might seem to be composed of several cities, but by its magnificence it seemed a palace. And as the entire structure resembled that of a tower, it contained also four other distinct towers at its four corners; whereof the others were but fifty cubits high; whereas that which lay upon the southeast corner was seventy cubits high, that from thence the whole temple might be viewed; but on the corner where it joined to the two cloisters of the temple, it had passages down to them both, through which the guard (for there always lay in this tower a Roman legion) went several ways among the cloisters, with their arms, on the Jewish festivals, in order to watch the people, that they might not there attempt to make any innovations; for the temple was a fortress that guarded the city, as was the tower of Antonia a guard to the temple; and in that tower were the guards of those three (14). There was also a peculiar fortress belonging to the upper city, which was Herod’s palace; but for the hill Bezetha, it was divided from the tower Antonia, as we have already told you; and as that hill on which the tower of Antonia stood was the highest of these three, so did it adjoin to the new city, and was the only place that hindered the sight of the temple on the north. And this shall suffice at present to have spoken about the city and the walls about it, because I have proposed to myself to make a more accurate description of it elsewhere.”

The Jewish historian Josephus said Fort Antonia was built upon a gigantic rock, on the highest hill, and had passages that went “down” to the temple. Josephus described it as a large structure, instead of what we find in Avi Yonah’s modern model of the fort. Josephus also said the fort blocked the view of the temple on the north side.

In the passage below we find the Romans used Fort Antonia as the base to attack the temple during 70 AD. They had previously gained access to the fort by attacking the foundation for seven days. (Book 6, Chapter 2, Section 7)
The passage proves at least part of Fort Antonia remained intact on the day the Jewish temple was destroyed.

From War of the Jews, by Josephus, Book 6, Chapter 4, sections 4-5.

"4. Now it is true that on this day the Jews were so weary, and under such consternation, that they refrained from any attacks. But on the next day they gathered their whole force together, and ran upon those that guarded the outward court of the temple very boldly, through the east gate, and this about the second hour of the day. These guards received that their attack with great bravery, and by covering themselves with their shields before, as if it were with a wall, they drew their squadron close together; yet was it evident that they could not abide there very long, but would be overborne by the multitude of those that sallied out upon them, and by the heat of their passion. However, Caesar seeing, from the tower of Antonia, that this squadron was likely to give way, he sent some chosen horsemen to support them. Hereupon the Jews found themselves not able to sustain their onset, and upon the slaughter of those in the forefront, many of the rest were put to flight. But as the Romans were going off, the Jews turned upon them, and fought them; and as those Romans came back upon them, they retreated again, until about the fifth hour of the day they were overborne, and shut themselves up in the inner [court of the] temple.
5. So Titus retired into the tower of Antonia, and resolved to storm the temple the next day, early in the morning, with his whole army, and to encamp round about the holy house. But as for that house, God had, for certain, long ago doomed it to the fire; and now that fatal day was come, according to the revolution of ages; it was the tenth day of the month Lous, [Ab, ] upon which it was formerly burnt by the king of Babylon; although these flames took their rise from the Jews themselves, and were occasioned by them; for upon Titus’s retiring, the seditious lay still for a little while, and then attacked the Romans again, when those that guarded the holy house fought with those that quenched the fire that was burning the inner [court of the] temple; but these Romans put the Jews to flight, and proceeded as far as the holy house itself. At which time one of the soldiers, without staying for any orders, and without any concern or dread upon him at so great an undertaking, and being hurried on by a certain divine fury, snatched somewhat out of the materials that were on fire, and being lifted up by another soldier, he set fire to a golden window, through which there was a passage to the rooms that were round about the holy house, on the north side of it. As the flames went upward, the Jews made a great clamor, such as so mighty an affliction required, and ran together to prevent it; and now they spared not their lives any longer, nor suffered any thing to restrain their force, since that holy house was perishing, for whose sake it was that they kept such a guard about it."

All of this provides tremendous evidence that the Dome of the Rock is the true location of Fort Antonia. Josephus said Fort Antonia was built upon a gigantic rock and that rock has not moved.

If at least part of Fort Antonia remained on the day the temple was destroyed, where is that part of Fort Antonia now?

Watch the YouTube video… The “Temple Mount” is Roman Fort Antonia, by Leeland Jones, to see the truth with your own eyes. The scorpion was the symbol of the Roman Praetorian Guard, and that symbol is found on the underground section of the Western Wall.

SpotterVideo
Автор

New sub from Static.
Excellent presentation. Going in my Trump Conspiracy Playlist with the webot predictions of Cliff High.
Interesting times for sure
♥️🙏♥️

Kimberly-Fredrick
Автор

Does anyone know where I can find an attic to put my static in? Asking for a friend, of course.

chriskenny
Автор

Static recommended this channel. Subbed.

reddyforML
Автор

That Hal Lindsey end times fiction was just that.

RAJohns
Автор

What I will never understand is why Bible-thumping, sanctimonious Americans so vehemently support Israel. It’s a complete conflict of interest.

TheRealLeahFarley
Автор

Believe in the LORD JESUS CHRIST and you will be saved! 💯

me-myself-n-i
Автор

Does the ark not look like the gold chest with wings on top they took from Tutankamens tomb, I can't find a picture of it anywhere.
The world is certainly very interesting atm.
Good vid guys ta.
Static sent me too, subbed.

trulymental
Автор

A few thoughts. The replica Ark is not the original and therefore would not have the same power, Said to be possessed in the Ark.
Then there is a matter of the bowing cherubim on the ark are "Graven Images", strictly forbidden by the 2nd Commandment.

Using the Ark as a sort of object to bring forth desired hopes: Is that not idolatry?, although God is said to be the one that gave us the commandments which directly or indirectly he has broken at his convenience. There is just nothing like leadership that sets the example by following their own rules.

Then there is the part of all the chaos, that Jesus needs by his Father's wishes, needed to bring the Prince of Peace. Something just does not fit here.

But, I must remember God's ways are different than man's. So they tell me!

And I can turn wood to gold.

Great video guys, as always.

charlesclaridy
Автор

Wouldn't put anything past him, life is strange but this sounds like a huge stretch, religion rarely brings peace😑Thanks fellas😊💙✌️

zenawarrior
Автор

Building the 3rd Temple before Jesus Christ returns is simply the Synagogue of Satan hard at work. See Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. This Synagogue of Satan is made up of descendants of Japeth who converted to Judaism throughout history. In the Table of Nations in Genesis 10, we see that Ashkenaz and his brother Togarmah were sons of Japeth through Gomer. Togarmah had ten sons, one of which was Khazar. In any case, even if the Temple is rebuilt, there is no Priesthood to administrate the sacred duties that the Levitical Priesthood back in the day. Josepheus records that all of the Jewish historical records were destroyed in 70 ad when the Romans sacked Jerusalem, burnt the Temple and razed it to its foundations. As such, if someone were to claim priestly lineage, we must ask to see their papers. For me, I am content to wait for the return of The Lord Jesus Christ to sort everything out. Only He knows who the true Israelites of the Bible are and they certainly will be actual blood descendants of Jacob.

rjkubr
Автор

War and more war .fighting will never stop

Cthulhu-ll
welcome to shbcf.ru