China is Lying About their Military Spending

preview_player
Показать описание
Check out Scope Technologies Corp (CSE:SCPE | OTCQB: SCPCF) to learn more

The Chinese Communist Party is spending far more on defense procurement in their military budget than you think. Xi Jingping has hidden a massive portion of his defense spending. Purchase power parity, clever accounting, and other tools have helped him. People like to talk about how the United States spendings more on defense than the next 10 countrys combined but that's not the whole story. Yes the pentagon spends a lot but the Peoples Liberation army spends way more than you think.

Written by: Chris Cappy and Anonymous
Edited by: Syed

Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.

#ANALYSIS #NEWS #UPDATE
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Hey spare parts army! Check out Scope Technologies Corp (CSE:SCPE | OTCQB: SCPCF) to learn more

Taskandpurpose
Автор

You have forgotten one important piece, no middle men.
State owned factories.

johnyblamounth
Автор

“All warfare is based on deception”

- some Chinese guy

nicholassigmon
Автор

I doubt the Chinese pay $500 for a military hammer or $14, 000 for an aircraft coffee maker !

sky
Автор

Our military has failed several audits.
So we definitely hide our spending to an extent too.

zaczane
Автор

"When weak, appear to be strong. When strong, appear to be weak." - Sun Tzu

Mike___Kilo
Автор

I've learned how to hide my savings as my own defense budget.

jamicub
Автор

Boeing: this bag of screws is worth USD 10k.
Norinco: I can provide the same thing with USD 10.
Boeing: you shameless liar!

eamoncat
Автор

As a chinese i am obligated to tell everyone that this guy is lying and we are fighting with m1 garands left over in the korean war, and half our army fights with nail guns

recker
Автор

It’s not that China’s military budget is high, but that the profit margins on contracts for American arms manufacturers are too high.😂

bobh
Автор

“Liar, liar, pants on fire”

- Sun Tzu

BarfyMan-shzf
Автор

The U.S already know. The closer figure to China's defense budget is more like 700b-800b, not 230b. This may be news to many, but not our gov't

mikelittle
Автор

I need to point out one mistake: China has a compulsory military service system, and the service period is two years. Therefore, the salary in the first two years is very low, indeed only $150 a month (usually it is college students who join the army and enjoy other education preferential policies). However, the core composition of the army is contract soldiers, and their monthly salary is much higher, starting from a minimum of $800 and going up. When you are promoted to sergeant after two years of service, the monthly salary can reach $1, 100. Considering the difference in purchasing power, the treatment of Chinese soldiers is not bad, because I have friends serving in the army.

妮蔻-nko
Автор

Don't forget their fishing boat fleet in the pacific comprising of 14, 000 giant fisher boats equipped with reinforced military ramps for heavy vehicles.

HideBuz
Автор

8:36 - "if it quacks like a duck, and shoots like a soldier... it's probably a soldier" 🦆 Loved this 🤣

PatrickDavidson-Scoop
Автор

As an example of Chinese purchasing power parody advantage, look at Chinese made rifle scopes. Their quality is only a little less than US made scopes, but the prices are sometimes 90% less. The difference between Chinese and US scopes in combat is probably insignificant, but if more soldiers have them, then that's a force multiplier. Demolition Ranch got a Vortex Diamondback scope on Temu for around $80, and it was a real Vortex.

garyswift
Автор

It's not about the number of budget. It's more about the spending efficiency. If you have 800 oversea bases, and spent $70K on a bag of bolts and nuts, $1K coffee mug and even $1K a toilet seat, your $800B spending but with much fewer output is understandable.

MrLiaojerry
Автор

Don’t forget the value of their industrial base. The ability to produce artillery shells and ships is invaluable.

fountainvalley
Автор

logical analysis. when US has the highest per capital healthcare expenditure among OEDC countries, yet has an declining life expectancy. US life expectancy is now lower then China.
Base on the same logic, we can say that many of these money did not go into healthcare, but went into the pockets of corporate executives, lobbies and campaign fund which will shape policies benefit the donors.. people are the suckers.

soonfoongloke
Автор

The thing to remember about PPP is that it's not just things being objectively cheaper elsewhere. The PPP normalizes for wages, GDP, etc. It's like saying if a Big Mac costs 1% of your monthly wage in both countries what's that in dollars...

GroggyWalrus
visit shbcf.ru