How did Scientists Prove the Universe is NOT REAL? Nobel Prize Winning proof EXPLAINED

In this video, I shall take you on a mind-bending exploration delving into the fascinating realm of quantum physics and the groundbreaking discovery that earned scientists the prestigious Nobel Prize. Based on various powerful theories of physics put out by famous scientists, we unravel the (un)real nature of the universe. The video also takes you through how particles defy traditional notions of existence, appearing only when observed, and ceasing to exist when unobserved. We will also discuss the captivating phenomenon of entangled particles and their role in settling the debate between quantum physics and Einstein's theories.

So, what makes this universe real? What brings all the stars, galaxies, the infinite space into existence? How powerful is this entity? We shall explore some intriguing questions that science is still scratching the surface of.

Watch till the end!

Please SUBSCRIBE to my channel to receive updates on new videos!

Follow me for more updates on temples, books and science:

[rosspittman]

Dear Archana Ji, Your videos are simply the best for seekers who want to understand the nature of reality - like Neo in the Matrix movies (which you also brilliantly deconstruct). Your unique and insightful perspective not only enlightens those of us who watch your videos, but also makes the complex journey of understanding reality an enjoyable and relatable experience. You are a truly gifted guide in my quest for knowledge. I feel like I am on a journey like Neo in The Matrix. Your guidance, Archana Ji, is like Morpheus' tutelage to Neo, and your wisdom resonates with the profound insights of the Oracle. As I venture into this fascinating exploration of reality, your shining wisdom is an invaluable beacon! Words cannot express my profound gratitude for what you do. So, I will simply say: THANK YOU!!!

[YetAnotherOrdinaryGuy]

To be more precise, Quantum physics does not claim that the particles (black/white balls) do not exist in the boxes. Rather the claim is that they can be either black or white and are in a quantum state so to speak i.e. in a state of possibilities. They take on the definite properties of either black or white upon measurement or observation. This is the same as Schrodinger's cat being both dead and alive until observed. Upon observation, the quantum superposition ends and reality resolves into any one definite possibility or the other.

[kamalkumarattinagaramu]

As usual an excellent video!!! Thank you so much for sharing!!

[starmakerid]

wow ma'am you are just amazing i havent seen such a brilliant and simple explanation of this complicated and mysterious phenomenon of quantum world. i am super excited and eagerly waiting to see your next post about how the science is trying to answer the questions related to consciousness

[thebug]

Brilliant presentation as usual Madam 🙏
This time sharing this with like minded people.

[debajyotiroy]

For last 1 year i m watching so many video of spiritual person on vedanta, Buddhism...finally i found ur channel....after watching 5/6 video i must say i should watch 1st ur channel....madam ur all post is immensely informative & helpful for me to get more clarity...thank u very very much...hope all teachers of all indian school will watch ur channel to teach students.

[saravanansarasu]

Brilliant video. . So simple n lucid n easy to digest. God speed.. please don't stop making such videos 🙏🔥

[venkataramansekharan]

this is explanation i wanted thanks ji

[michaeldillon]

Dear Madam I find your straightforward explanation of complex concepts to be wonderful 🙏.
I am a UK born Christian who undertook a long search that led me to advaita Vedanta generally and Sri Ramana Maharshi 🙏 in particular.
Simultaneously I had done a course in the basic concepts of Quantum Physics ans began to notice that some concepts in quantum physics, like Niels Bohr 's statements, looked like Vedanta . So I understood the importance of the Novel Prize for physics concerning Bell's inequality. This gave me great pleasure but I was reminded of Swami Sarvapriyananda who said that Advaita Vedanta doesn't need scientific justification - not least because science can change over time, advaita does not .
By chance I was watching a discussion between Bernardo Kastrup and Prof Tim Maudlin .
I didn't know anything about Prof Maudlin. I was surprised to find this gentleman who refutes Bohr and ultimately the award of the Nobel Prize stating that their conclusions are wrong .
I would love to see you in discussion with Prof Maudlin or to do a presentation that critiques Maudlin . Thank you 🙏. E=🕉️

[prashanthkk]

Brilliant. Keep going. Love your videos and simplistic explanation.

[sethumadhavakurup]

Advaita doctrine explained by Sri Shankara is clear and straightforward. Sat only existed always, Jagat, Jeeva are superimposition or Prathibhasa, adhyasa on Sat, Brahman.

[subramanianganesh]

Vivekachudamani talks about this.We have the answers, but we need a brilliant mind to put it forward.

[RaghuG]

13:30 Sri Raman Maharshi: The Universe does not say 'I am'. is there any evidence to say that the universe appears ? To whom does this universe appear ? Find out who you are. Then afterwards tell me if there is a universe.
(-Ref Padamalai page 281)

All that is meant is that the seen regarded as an independent entity, independent of the Self, is unreal. The seen is not different from the seer. What exists is the one Self, not a seer (Obeserver) and seen (Observation). The seen regarded as the Self is real.
(-Ref Padamalai page 278)

Btw, thank you very much for this awesome video.

[ashokchorge]

Simply Amazing ! Keep it Up Archana Ji !

[tukisaha]

One question ma'am it is said that "A particle does not have any real existence until it is observed " how a particle or a thing can be observed when It's not there ? I mean to say something have to be first then observation and everything right ?

[sethumadhavakurup]

Even Jagadeeswara as Narayanan or SadaShiva, or Jagadambal .., all are manifestations of the same reality

[LuvHrtZ]

Einstein seems to have forgotten that photons travel the entire Universe instantly within their own reference frame. Causality would experience the exact same result for the entangled particles once an observation is made.

[sethumadhavakurup]

Madam,
Uncertainty principle says that observation causes wave function to collapse into particle . Or in put it in different way - particle exist as a probability until observed . Further, it is difficult to pin point position and momentum of particle at the same time
Does it say that there is no exisistance of particle without observer ?

[RaviKumar-mclh]

Swami Sarvapriyananda of Ramkrishna mission . Go for a heavy dose of Vedanta

[sriharshas]

Its difficult to digest until we experience advitha. My question here is' Why i cany observe himalayas in bangalore? ' because himalayas come to existence only by observing.