Holder: Roe v. Wade Draft Could Signal SCOTUS Moves On Privacy Rights And Beyond

preview_player
Показать описание
Former Attorney General Eric Holder tells Andrea Mitchell that the draft opinion on abortion could signal future Supreme Court moves on privacy rights and beyond. “Is same sex marriage is going to be at risk? The regulation of contraception, is that going to be at risk? Even interracial marriage? All of these things are based on the right to privacy, which this opinion in its form as we saw it, really goes at the that, that right to privacy," says Holder.

About: MSNBC is the premier destination for in-depth analysis of daily headlines, insightful political commentary and informed perspectives. Reaching more than 95 million households worldwide, MSNBC offers a full schedule of live news coverage, political opinions and award-winning documentary programming -- 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube

#AbortionRights #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

His prosecution isn't only appropriate, it's necessary.

ehbcd
Автор

Well said

They cannot be allowed to self-regulate!

sdscipio
Автор

Given enough votes in congress, could Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett be impeached for lying while under oath during there senate confirmation hearing? Could this give enough motivation for Dem voters to go and vote in 2024 and 2022?

dinewalton
Автор

The Republicans couldn't convict #45 when he was as guilty sin... so what makes us think they value the Rule of Law with regard to this leak?

emancify
Автор

I would like know when they start banning interracial marriage how will that affect justice Thomas?

frankbihn
Автор

''Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!''

joebloggs
Автор

This ruling is the setup for all the others

Ed-uzem
Автор

My biggest question beyond the horror of it all, is this: WHO PAYS FOR IT ALL? The moment the female is not able to keep the pregnancy, then the STATE (S) must mandate that they pay all medical costs associated with the woman’s confinement, labor, and delivery/birth, including the expense of raising and educating a child until they’re 18. PERIOD. FUL STOP. OR. NO DEAL!

ingriddekauwe
Автор

Men get ready to PAY CHILD SUPPORT for children you didn't want

kymtaylor
Автор

Congratulations to the MEN being given a WOMAN’S AWARD.

johnconnor
Автор

"Let's create a bill to expand Roe v Wade instead of preserving it. Let, 's dissolve 500 state laws while we are at it." --Democrats. Stop playing games and just get it done. There is a reason nothing has been done for 50 years.

TheUMIA
Автор

Mitch: "This decision puts the issue of abortion back where it belongs: at the state level for them the decide."
Also Mitch: "If we win the Senate, we will immediately ban abortions at the federal level, because it can't be left to the states."

🤔😅😂🤣

rgwak
Автор

I'm sick of hearing... and their new book

djjones
Автор

Sounds like they're complaining about potentially not being able to control or influence these things...yeah, my heart goes out to you🤔

badnoxin
Автор

Eric Holder is the last person that should be interviewed about laws.

ErnestTeeBass
Автор

No more OOPS now men you have to pay for 18 years for a child you didn't want. No more easy outs🤣🤣🤣Trying to control OUR BODIES

kymtaylor
Автор

Ministry of truth is lies

Ministry of plenty is starvation

alanbuzby
Автор

They have to be a limit on the supreme court how long they should service. I say no more than 16 years.

ronniehayes
Автор

so i'm supporting my family of 4 with hard labor factory work, my partner has liver disease and stays home with our 2 kids, while i support us all. i'm about a month and a half along and cannot afford to be out of work for even a week, as we're barely making it as it is, and i'm not going to be able to do hard labor for very long pregnant, so who is going to pay all our bills for 6 plus months while i'm pregnant and cannot work? and for a month or so after i give birth? i need food for 4 ppl, $1500 a month in rent alone, my $250 car payment to get to work, $300 in full coverage car insurance, $100 for comcast internet, $80 a month for trash pickup, $115 a month for my cell phone, $100 a month for diapers and wipes for my youngest i already have, gas money, $80-100 a month for my power bill, $100 a month in my water bill, etc, so whos going to pay all this while i'm pregnant? or should i allow my whole family to become destitute for the sake of the fetus? what about the rights of the 2 children i already have? do they not matter? i'm going to need about $3000 a month to support us all until i can get back to work, my cash app is: $ktstach thank u so much guys, i didn't realize pro life strangers truly cared about life so much they were willing to actually pay for it!!!

EnigmaticHandbags
Автор

Ethics???😹😹😹 Haven't seen ethics with ANY of the appointed or elected "officials" in decades, with very few exceptions. It should be the other way around: I've seen ethics in the majority of appointed or elected officials, with very few exceptions.

lynnebarrett