McKinsey PST - Fact-based Conclusion questions

McKinsey PST is a hard hard hard test ... but not anymore when broken down into question types ... And we are the first one to do just that. Let's tackle the third one, accounting for around 14% of the McKinsey PST! Enjoy the show!
________________________

SUGGESTED SOURCES:
Question Types, Study Plan and Mock Test for McKinsey PST:
________________________

Hope to see you in the next video!
________________________
Time Stamps:
0:00 Intro
0:54 Question formats
1:56 The logic of Fact-based Conclusion
6:46 Examples
11:30 2 twist versions of Fact-based Conclusion
19:50 Outro

[aleksxxxxxx]

This is one of the best prep materials I found on the net. I will definitely buy something on your website just so you keep on producing the content. Thanks

[moiscpo]

Hi, I don't see why D is proven false on the question at 14:30, if 'potential rating is based on the maximum recent revenue' and what we are given is the maximum recent revenue GROWTH, how can we conclude anything on the revenue?

[asingla]

Always nice to hear your videos. Keep it up.

[deanhodges]

I was surprised to get 3 out of 3. Thanks for the share!

[nunitoism]

Amazing videos my friend. Very helpful.

[ersultan]

Hello, Kim! I just wanted to point out that at 15:30, you circled Raju Foundation instead of Farhan Discovery. Thank you very much for your very insightful videos :)

[jenn]

Thank you Kim, This is really helpful~Thanks a lot~~

[romankochurov]

Strange that with such quality and nice examples video is so low on views...

[rodrigogallardo]

So basically when the answer choice talks about a survey without giving a percentage or ratio of what the customers said, then we can make no conclusion on their importance?

great video, very helpful btw... keep it going!

[kushalkhandare]

whoever has created that question on False Conclusion, is a fan of Bollywood movie 3 idiots.

[MehdiSAADALLAH]

Hi Kim, the C is proven false if you compare the Rancho and Silencer The difference is Higher and they still got the same Ranking

[jandalfthegrey]

When following the links you provide the one to more practice content doesn’t work, and when I try to download the free Toyo PST it brings me to an error page. I’ve emailed your team. Is your site still operating?

[kaydeelove]

In the false conclusion question, option D says the false conclusion is based on the maximum 'recent' revenue. The data refers to maximum revenue growth in a period of 5 years. So the maximum could have been in year 2 which is not necessarily the most recent. This is why this wasnt the option for me. Option C however, you can see that the risk ratings for Rancho and Silencer are different even though the differences are not the same. Please correct my reasoning so I know where i am getting it wrong. Thank you

[janechong]

Hi Kim, what's the difference between twist version #2 and Root-cause reason questions?

[OpioGabriel-nh]

Hey sir, am Gabriel from Uganda I do have a question 1 in 66 what is it?

[demokyc]

Hi, for the final question, does statement B not only indicate that a change in price has an impact on perceived quality? The statement does not prove that a price REDUCTION will NEGATIVELY impact brand quality (i.e. a low price could indicate high quality, the statement is not explicit).

[what_]

hi, kim. i got a question for you can you tell me why businesses hire consultants ?

[jamiechou]

in false conclusion question, in the question it asks economic growth while in the table it says revenue growth for first column and economic growth on the second column. is that correct? confused me a bit....

[visionrevivalofficial]

Hey Kim and thank you a lot for your help. For the B answer, why did you have to multiply the 40 by 4 while they stated at least ''one'' inspector must work 40 hours per week. Why not directly compare 40 with 168 ? Since 168 hours is the individual weekly result as well ..

[DapurGendats]

hi kim thanks for the video, you circle the wrong answer